Official Everybody Edits Forums

272

Guest

no no no! noooooo!

chat is $3.00 >.< cris
WTF are you thinking?!
vote for chat to be back to 1 cent!

people that agree:
272
171
baconator/meepsninja

people that disagree:

neither(other idea or doesn't care):

Last edited by 272 (Aug 18 2012 1:19:26 pm)

Wolf exile1

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

If they were losing money, Why not make it 50 cents?

N1KF

Wiki Mod

From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 11,114

Website

Re: no no no! noooooo!

*sigh* *facepalm*

About 95% of the people didn't know that you get 50 gems from getting chat. I'm glad I'm part of the 5%. Put me as neutral, because I don't really care since I didn't plan to get chat, anyway.

XxAtillaxX

Member

Joined: 2015-11-28

Posts: 4,202

Re: no no no! noooooo!

It should be just free, who cares what the parents think? It's their responsibility to talk and take control of their children and to limit their rights, not Chris'.

$3 is too much for a damn basic human right; communication.

---

*u stinky*

Urban

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

It should be just free, who cares what the parents think? It's their responsibility to talk and take control of their children and to limit their rights, not Chris'.

$3 is too much for a damn basic human right; communication.

That's exactly what I was thinking.

I agree, so you can add me to the list, 272.

soccerfreak006

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

I think part of the reason he did this may be to avoid spam. But I don't agree, I don't think that you should complain about this. You get 2 things back, and you could have bought it when it was 1 cent, so why didn't you?

Last edited by soccerfreak006 (Aug 18 2012 12:45:21 pm)

XxAtillaxX

Member

Joined: 2015-11-28

Posts: 4,202

Re: no no no! noooooo!

I think part of the reason he did this may be to avoid spam

The server can handle it very much, and people could be given a proper ignore list.

---

*u stinky*

Squirrel

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

I'll ask here instead of making a new topic- can I pay for the chat using a pre-paid credit card? The $3 is no prob but I'm not keen on using my own card or my Paypal which would reveal my name and address.

Saintcool

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

But anyone wanting chat would have got it by now, and any new people won't complain because they didn't know it was 1 cent.

Squirrel PayPal is seperate from ee, so no one will find out where you live (nor does anyone care).

Terence22205

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

It comes with 50 gems though. 50 gems would usually be 5$. So basically for 3$ your getting 50 gems AND chat. I like it.

Master1

Member

From: Crait

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,452

Re: no no no! noooooo!

Put me on the raise it to $20 list. I like watching you people complain over pointless stuff.

Last edited by Master1 (Aug 18 2012 1:14:19 pm)

---

Fdoou

Banned

Re: no no no! noooooo!

I don't care because I have chat

XxAtillaxX

Member

Joined: 2015-11-28

Posts: 4,202

Re: no no no! noooooo!

Put me on the raise it to $20 list. I like watching you people complain over pointless stuff.

It isn't pointless, it is an opinion that is worth cash, which I have a hard time thinking that's going to change since someone seems to like EE only for it's revenue.

I don't care because I have chat

In real life would you prefer everyone was completely mute?
Might as well go hide in a closet.

It comes with 50 gems though. 50 gems would usually be 5$. So basically for 3$ your getting 50 gems AND chat. I like it.

I would like it a tad more too, had gems not been just virtual items.

you could have bought it when it was 1 cent, so why didn't you?

The new players' parents didn't exist in the past.

Last edited by ?tilla (Aug 18 2012 1:21:55 pm)

---

*u stinky*

Urban

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

Put me on the raise it to $20 list. I like watching you people complain over pointless stuff.

I wouldn't say saving money is not pointless. Even if it is only $2.99. Giving money away to others is not a hobby of mine.

ILoveBacon

Guest

Re: no no no! noooooo!

It should be just free, who cares what the parents think? It's their responsibility to talk and take control of their children and to limit their rights, not Chris'.

$3 is too much for a damn basic human right; communication.

I agree that it should be free. The censorship is presice as hell anyway. You can hardly talk about anything without a *** popping in somewhere.

Tako

Member

From: Memphis, Tennessee, USA

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 6,663

Website

Re: no no no! noooooo!

1) Petitioning will do nothing, as Chris does not view the forums.
2) You might be making this a bigger deal than it actually is.
3) We have a topic to discuss updates, please post there.

Closed.

---

Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.