Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Here's a question to you unknowledgable haters of Obama:
If Obama is the source of our problems, how would have Romney fixed it? By backtracking on everything he said the past months?
You posted while I was typing, D-rock.
(SUPER POST 2,600! It's time to get my noobishness out of me that came in me around 2,575 posts.)
Last edited by N1KF (Nov 7 2012 5:58:46 pm)
Offline
You posted while I was typing, D-rock.
(SUPER POST 2,600! It's time to get my noobishness out of me that came in me around 2,575 posts.)
Come at me, bro.
I'm not your brother, so you must be talking to your real brother.
Here's a question to you unknowledgable haters of Obama:
If Obama is the source of our problems, how would have Romney fixed it? By backtracking on everything he said the past months?
If obama is the source of our problems, how would have Romney done better? By being there instead of obama so we wouldn't have our source of problems.
Romney:
We don't take the risk of having more problems.
obama:
We have the risk of having more problems, but he might fix it.
The more I think about it, the less I think of how bad Obama is. I think I'll go in between, for now.
Last edited by N1KF (Nov 7 2012 6:06:59 pm)
Offline
I'm waiting for you to back up your claim instead of spamming your post count up with little sentences.
I'm waiting for you to back up your claim instead of spamming your post count up with little sentences.
This post just won the battle.
Claim? It's true that I'm not your brother, but I'm your cousin.
Apparently I have to speak literally and clearly and reinforce my references to what I am talking about now because you can't catch on. You should really be reported by everyone on the forums for spamming by now. You clearly know what context I am speaking in so please tell me why Obama caused 6 trillion in debt, solely him, not republicans and why America is stupid because for voting him in.
I can't explain how stupid you are being but here is a picture of what I think your current facial expression looks like. Oh and please don't take what the picture says literally, because I'm not saying you are a police officer or ever will be in that matter and you should completely not be stupid in spamming another post onto your post count.
Last edited by D-rock2308 (Nov 7 2012 6:14:23 pm)
Helloo-ooo? No ones responded back to my argument ._. I need some bang in the chang! ;o BTW kirby: youre just stating these inaccurate fake facts that are actually opinions + thoughts most likely conveyed from your padres ;p
Last edited by ipwner (Nov 7 2012 6:21:32 pm)
ssAARASAAAAAAAAA iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA
EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu IUO0O0oooooooooooppi
;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q
Im A ®a®ity ®
Offline
iPwner:
Not being D-rocks's brother? True. Being his cousin? True. What I said in my latest big post? If false, then it was on accident, because that's what Arceus64 said.
D-rock:
The rules consider spam as "nonsense or repeated posts". They make sense, and they're not repeated.
Last edited by N1KF (Nov 7 2012 6:18:49 pm)
Offline
Not sure if you don't read my posts or you just feel like spamming off-topic. Also If you were my cousin I'd probably have punched you already but I have yet to punch a cousin.
My last post so I don't help you spam your post count up. That is, unless you explain yourself with reasoning your claim about Obama.
EDIT:
Do not...
...post useless, irrelevant, inappropriate, or incomprehensible content.
Topic of this is 2012 Presidential Election; you broke it twice?
You posted while I was typing, D-rock.
(SUPER POST 2,600! It's time to get my noobishness out of me that came in me around 2,575 posts.)
EDIT EDIT:
Claim? It's true that I'm not your brother, but I'm your cousin.
The rules consider spam as "nonsense or repeated posts". They make sense, and they're not repeated.
You got proved wrong.
Last edited by D-rock2308 (Nov 7 2012 6:22:25 pm)
If false, then it was on accident, because that's what Arceus64 said.
Said what?
Kirby and for all you republicans, here are my broken down bite-size points:
~obama hasnt done a bad job, considering the circumstances
~he's also trying to make certain achievements, improve on certain policies, and make the U.S.A. a better place - a portion of the money went to good causes, and most of the money lost was product of bush
~romney just says he's gonna do what obama's gonna do (excluding certain policies they disagree on, and Romney just has completely out-of-this-world-in-terms-of-nonsense policies in these cases!)
~it actually seemed like romney KNEW it was for the greater of america for obama to win in his concession speech - now i know romney isn't as bad of a guy as i thought!- hes just a guy trying to please his father... but hes not president gear.
sorry for being so harsh kirby :s im just trying to convince you
again, i need 1 more -rep so i can get back to 42. ty. :3
EDIT: 2 more... gadgetgeek... -_-
Last edited by ipwner (Nov 7 2012 6:31:44 pm)
ssAARASAAAAAAAAA iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA
EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu IUO0O0oooooooooooppi
;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q
Im A ®a®ity ®
Offline
Not sure if you don't read my posts or you just feel like spamming off-topic. Also If you were my cousin I'd probably have punched you already but I have yet to punch a cousin.
We're all in the same family. If you go far enough in the family tree, you'll get there. If you don't know you're false, then you're not lying.
My last post so I don't help you spam your post count up. That is, unless you explain yourself with reasoning your claim about Obama.
I didn't know that Arceus64 was wrong, because that's what I was going for. If you don't know you're false, then you're not lying.
EDIT:
Supreme Rules wrote:Do not...
...post useless, irrelevant, inappropriate, or incomprehensible content.Topic of this is 2012 Presidential Election; you broke it twice?
Useless? It was used to try to get this argument over with, because you're making me look like a noob.
Irrelevant? It was relevant because that's where you threw this conversation.
Inappropriate? Irrelevant is a synonym, so read above.
incomprehensible? You could understand it.
You posted while I was typing, D-rock.
(SUPER POST 2,600! It's time to get my noobishness out of me that came in me around 2,575 posts.)EDIT EDIT:
Claim? It's true that I'm not your brother, but I'm your cousin.
The rules consider spam as "nonsense or repeated posts". They make sense, and they're not repeated.
You got proved wrong.
That was part of my post, not just repeated. Let's say you have 2 balls. One is red, and one is red and blue. The red was made first, and you say the red and blue one was a repeat. Does that make sense?
Now, I'm not going to read this topic anymore because any more post making is tiring, and makes me look like a noob. It is right to not argue. Sorry I'm doing this so harsh, it's the only way for you to stop getting in my way.
I underlined the next you need to start noticing.
Offline
Cousin is meant to refer to your immediate family. We're all distantly related to each other, going back around 50 generations.
Offline
Guess what everyone? Obama won. Why is this still open? :x
Last edited by terence22205 (Nov 7 2012 8:25:55 pm)
We can still discuss the elections even after they are over. People still have opinions to debate about.
aka towwl
Offline
~obama hasnt done a bad job, considering the circumstances
Considering the circumstances? The economy has declined since he took office. Yes, the country was falling. Point is: If Obama couldn't take the heat, he should of never ran for office.
The only acceptable argument i'd take that is in Obama's favor, would be that he could do a better job then Romney. I personally disagree with that, but still, its a logical opinion.
~it actually seemed like romney KNEW it was for the greater of america for obama to win in his concession speech - now i know romney isn't as bad of a guy as i thought!- hes just a guy trying to please his father... but hes not president gear.
You're that kind of person that would hate Romney no matter what he said because you're parents voted for Obama and you don't have any clue what you're talking about. Doesn't matter what Romney would say, you'd take it bad either way. Romney decided to be a good sport, and say his farewells, and you spin some pathetic twist on it. If Romney did some offensive political topic, you trash him too. You're making your opinion totally pointless.
Guess what everyone? Obama won. Why is this still open? :x
Totally, the election was a one day thing! Not like its going to effect every single person in America for the next four years! Nothing to talk about there!
ipwner wrote:~obama hasnt done a bad job, considering the circumstances
Considering the circumstances? The economy has declined since he took office. Yes, the country was falling. Point is: If Obama couldn't take the heat, he should of never ran for office.
The only acceptable argument i'd take that is in Obama's favor, would be that he could do a better job then Romney. I personally disagree with that, but still, its a logical opinion.
I agree, Hillary Clinton would have been better than Obama, but hey, still better than George Bush #3, right??
ipwner wrote:~it actually seemed like romney KNEW it was for the greater of america for obama to win in his concession speech - now i know romney isn't as bad of a guy as i thought!- hes just a guy trying to please his father... but hes not president gear.
You're that kind of person that would hate Romney no matter what he said because you're parents voted for Obama and you don't have any clue what you're talking about.
Damn!
terence22205 wrote:Guess what everyone? Obama won. Why is this still open? :x
Totally, the election was a one day thing! Not like its going to effect every single person in America for the next four years! Nothing to talk about there!
I agree, this is still, technically, talk about the Election, this topic is still realivent.
I laugh, and agree with Every post Drock made in that argument., but this quote made me laugh the most
Also If you were my cousin I'd probably have punched you already but I have yet to punch a cousin.
Anybody that missed out, go to the page before this and read it all, its freakin hilarious.
Offline
The only acceptable argument i'd take that is in Obama's favor, would be that he could do a better job then Romney. I personally disagree with that, but still, its a logical opinion.
I'm no economical genius, but didn't we try Romney's trickle-down method with G. W. Bush?
And besides, like I told you earlier, Romney wasn't planning to balance the budget until his assumed second term. What if Obama is doing the same thing? With a plan that didn't drastically fail in the past?
And what about our moral agreement? Are those not logical to you? Am I not allowed to include those?
Something else that speaks to me is the fact he lost Massachusetts by a landslide. If he did such a fantastic job in MA, why did they not vote for him in at least a majority?
Yeah, well, you know that's just like, uh, your opinion, man.
Offline
Offline
What if Obama is doing the same thing? With a plan that didn't drastically fail in the past?
Well, it looks like we'll see in the next four years then. I'm not going to be ticked or pleased about this election until after I see the results of his second term - and that's all I have to say on the matter.
If there is economic gain, then I'll happily admit to defeat, if there is still economic fall (about just as bad as it is now) then I'll loudly call him a moron. Fair enough?
Jaybm, George Bush added.. what.. i'm not looking up how much money. But NO one could have taken the "heat", george bush started the deficit and it's not like obama can magically make millions of jobs out of thin air ?? do you have any better plans than obama had? If so, blast em away! ;3
Also, I'm guessing you're just relying off of your parents as well! Yes, my parents are democrats. But at least I take the time to understand why, and it seems to make sense to me! So I'm gonna stick with the democrats. Anyways yah ;p if you have a better plan, state it right over 'ere. There really wasn't much he could do, except for what he has already done (don't feel like looking for the info, look it up yourself)!
In addition, you didn't comment on any of my other points...
~he's also trying to make certain achievements, improve on certain policies, and make the U.S.A. a better place - a portion of the money went to good causes, and most of the money lost was product of bush
~romney just says he's gonna do what obama's gonna do (excluding certain policies they disagree on, and Romney just has completely out-of-this-world-in-terms-of-nonsense policies in these cases!)
...is this because you see this logic? Well if so, I'm glad - please consider more before becoming a republican !! BTW's, you're also making your comebacks quite pointless - that wasn't even an argument you gave on the last point, i was just throwing it out there - you just want to complain about that too. bit, plz ^___^!! And Jaybm, how do I not have any clue of what I'm talking about any more than you don't? I'm not going to explicitly say that you have no idea of what you're talking about just out of politeness and nonarrogancy towards you...! Endearingly, just to throw this out there, i have watched all the debates, looked up unbiased data online, and as a matter of fact DO have an idea of what i am talking about.. if you say/were thinking of saying "that doesn't make you have an idea of what's going on" then what do you do that makes you have *SUCH* a better vision for the future of america???!!!
Argumental Status:
IPWNER: 2 WON (unless you've got something to say )
JAYBM: 0 WON
UNDECIDED/UPCOMING RESULTS (let's see if you can counter my shizz ;3): 2
suck tht betch ^,^ bring it on
EDIT: Also Jaybm, the economy only got worse towards the beginning, when the country was still declining. But it's getting better already as you can see in his latest year as president! (and maybe even a little before that !) Many miraculous things have happened [ex. usama bin laden dead, obamacare, upcoming legalization of immigration, etc.], in addition to the economy improving. ;3
SUCK THT #2 C=!! bazinga bootch L0L
----
sorry for making this long, just read it all jaybm or admit defeat (i can pull out quotes from what i said to prove you wrong if you didnt read it all ;d!!)!!!!!!! ;D wow these forums give me free debate practice >=) i love it! ;D
Last edited by ipwner (Nov 8 2012 12:32:41 pm)
ssAARASAAAAAAAAA iAAAAAAAAAAAAA OU yaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAA YAAAaa YAAaah; yaayaayaa, yayayaya-ya-ya YAAA YAAAYA; YAYAYA YAAHAYAhAAAAAAAAAA
EPIOOOOOUUUUUUuuuuuu IUO0O0oooooooooooppi
;3 0>o ~X_x~ <~(^V^)~> (); ;B ;~; *~<:',',',',',{ Q=(*@`)Q
Im A ®a®ity ®
Offline
Bush did way worse because Clinton did such a good job before. We had a surplus of money and it was continuing to go up. It's much worse to destroy the economy when it's thriving as opposed to being unable to slow down it's already massive descent.
Offline
I think the government should primarily be concerned with the environment, rather than topics like the economy and illegal immigration.
[ Started around 1738813984.9236 - Generated in 0.283 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.79 MiB (Peak: 2.05 MiB) ]