Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

Kind of helpful....

Say if someone posted a word like antidisestablishmentarianism and you want to know the definition for that word, just go to Google and type in the search box define: then the word you want so you don't have to look it up on the online dictionary.

Example: define: word

Some people have probably already heard of this, but I hope it helps! //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/wink

/Alex

#2 Before February 2015

Echo!
Guest

Re: Kind of helpful....

A lot of words already come up with the definition box with out saying "define". you can also put "definition" or what ever in there with the word you are searching..... I'm pretty sure many people are aware. //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

#3 Before February 2015

Sensei1
Member
From: The land of saunas
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 1,112

Re: Kind of helpful....

I didn't know about this, thanks //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile

Offline

#4 Before February 2015

Tachyonic
Guest

Re: Kind of helpful....

Isn't this kind of a pointless topic?

Not only do we already know this, but what else can we post related to this?

#5 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

GadgetGeek wrote:

Isn't this kind of a pointless topic?

Not only do we already know this, but what else can we post related to this?

A dancing giraffe.

This topic was basically to inform people, it doesn't need to be talked about.

#6 Before February 2015

Fdoou
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

Then why put it up for discussion??

#7 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

Fdoou wrote:

Then why put it up for discussion??

Im not but with every topic anyone ever posts, there is bound to be a discussion.

So it's not 'up' to a discussion it just became a discussion.
The normal person would just go 'thanks this was helpful' not start off any argument :/

#8 Before February 2015

Tachyonic
Guest

Re: Kind of helpful....

"I at least helped 1 person. You are just selfish." you say, just as an excuse to -rep me back.

How am I even selfish?
The topic's blatant rubbish. That's that.

Last edited by Tachyonic (Jun 22 2013 4:13:05 pm)

#9 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

GadgetGeek wrote:

"I at least helped 1 person. You are just selfish." you say, just as an excuse to -rep me back.

How am I even selfish?
The topic's blatant rubbish. That's that.

Because YOU started off this argument, questioning if this is a helpful topic or not. You are selfish because you didn't take into consideration that I helped someone when you said this topic is complete rubbish. All your points are invalid. I put this topic in off-topic for a reason so people can benefit from what I told them not complain like a 4 year old.

#10 Before February 2015

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,158
Website

Re: Kind of helpful....

I normally just type "meaning of [word]" instead, but it may help some people who don't know about it. Also, GadgetGeek, if you don't like this topic, just ignore it.

Offline

#11 Before February 2015

Tachyonic
Guest

Re: Kind of helpful....

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:
GadgetGeek wrote:

"I at least helped 1 person. You are just selfish." you say, just as an excuse to -rep me back.

How am I even selfish?
The topic's blatant rubbish. That's that.

Because YOU started off this argument, questioning if this is a helpful topic or not. You are selfish because you didn't take into consideration that I helped someone when you said this topic is complete rubbish. All your points are invalid. I put this topic in off-topic for a reason so people can benefit from what I told them not complain like a 4 year old.

yao-ming-rage-face-photo-u2.jpg
You really are "M3NTAL".

Lets dissect this because I can and will, and maybe you'll see the errors of your ways.

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:

Because YOU started off this argument, questioning if this is a helpful topic or not.

I said this was a pile of pointless turd (Not in those words, mind you - but similarly). That's not asking for an argument, that's just a fact. Besides, you can't start an argument without the second side to deter whether it actually is an argument. If anything, you started this.

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:

You are selfish because you didn't take into consideration that I helped someone when you said this topic is complete rubbish.

Oooo, you "helped" someone discover the extremities of putting "define:" into Google. Surely, we must all bow beneath you and kiss your stupid feet.

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:

All your points are invalid.

By all stated before your faux pas-filled shenanigan, you mean the "The topic's blatant rubbish," which isn't even invalid. It's an opinionated truth (Much like Darwin's Theory of Evolution).

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:

I put this topic in off-topic for a reason

Even so, off-topic debates against spam threads. This is one of them. It wasn't made for a full on commentry by other people. I would have accepted this thread if the topic at hand was actually useful for people. (And no, a useless Google command that doesn't even need to be put into the search box to have a definition appear isn't useful.)

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:

so people can benefit from what I told them

Please tell me, Alex, how the heck people benefit from such tom-foolery, when you don't even need to type it to find the definition told by Google.

AL3XTH3M3NTALON3 wrote:

not complain like a 4 year old.

Because of course, only 4 year old's are allowed to complain. Clearly, the people against SOPA, PIPA and the NSA are nothing more than inept citizens who have no idea what they're talking about.

Your logic is flawed.

Number(1)KirbyFan10 wrote:

Also, GadgetGeek, if you don't like this topic, just ignore it.

I ignore too much, but this topic took the cringe-worthy cake.

Last edited by Tachyonic (Jun 22 2013 5:14:30 pm)

#12 Before February 2015

Fdoou
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

Ignoring kirby and gadgetgeek's statements:

There isn't anything worth discussing here. You stated it isn't up for discussion.

Is the sole purpose of this topic to get people to thank you?

#13 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

Ok @Fdoou & Gadgetgeek:

Basically the ONLY reason I wanted to make this topic was to help people, which the forum is kinda about. I didn't know if many people knew this so I made a topic about it to find out. Purely out of curiosity and wanting to help people. Now I knew I was going to get negative comments but you both have escalated this into an argument over what? A little thing someone could do over the internet? To save them time looking through the dictionary. Now you both could of said 'it comes up with the definition anyways' and I would've excepted that and perhaps closed it.

But you both have started this argument by posting things not related to the topic. You both especially GadgetGeek take my posts apart and try and find something to moan about. I see Fdoou has +repped saying to be on your side, this isn't supposed to be a debate it supposed to be a informative topic.

You both started it and this is Ted's facial expression over your comments in this topic:

4683-ted-movie-2012-iphone-hd-wallpaper_340x510.jpg

#14 Before February 2015

Tachyonic
Guest

Re: Kind of helpful....

Well done for completely ignoring my post.
You'll probably ignore this one and the ones after, so I'll wait for the firework display.

#15 Before February 2015

Alexthementalone
Banned

Re: Kind of helpful....

GadgetGeek wrote:

Well done for completely ignoring my post.
You'll probably ignore this one and the ones after, so I'll wait for the firework display.

I commented on your last post by saying you take my posts apart.

Alexthementalone 1423677702283730

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1738855242.1201 - Generated in 0.065 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.71 MiB) ]