Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
You should consider alts, and spam accounts, not every single one of those will be a different person. Also, as said your calculations are bs. If you simply just gave the actual average of us now (i only do ~3) which i would guess makes the average 5-8 due to forum games peeps. A thread every 2 days is also bs. Youd run out of ideas. Id suggest one every week/fortnight per person. In addition, why do I care, its just a maths question? Well your thread title states, how many posts would there be if everyone was active. Im simply helping you answer it. These current stats definitely are off for an ACTUAL realistic answer
I edited the post, i can't make it realistic, bcs i don't know how much alts per user and things, let's suppose nobody has alts and everyone has unlimited ideas.
Last edited by Creature (Aug 27 2014 3:33:12 pm)
This is a false statement.
Offline
"Active" forumers don't normally post 10 times a day... Your calculations are still quite off.
Offline
^ forum games. you're guilty.
Just type how much do you think a active forummer post.
This is a false statement.
Offline
i think rediolol is correct
because he is always right
except that time he nominated me as guardian
Last edited by Fdoou (Aug 27 2014 7:01:05 pm)
Reidolol is always right, except when he's wrong, and on the frequent occasion he has no idea what he talking about.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
JaWapa wrote:Reidolol is always right, except when he's wrong, and on the frequent occasion he has no idea what he talking about.
I know what i'm talking, you just don't understand, stop complaining.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Are you taking the average from all time, since it got turned over to Meredith, or just this year? That would change the average, for sure. Let's say average from all time. If you take people who were active a short time, and take into effect that they were only active for one week over the 3/4 years the forums been around.
You also have to not include deleted posts, which means you have to back and recount everything by hand, and not their post number. You must also subtract the exact number of days the forum was down when it crashed before it came back, if you want to be accurate.
Now it's time to remember that some users are banned. Then you can worry about the alts. I know people that have used 3+ alts on the forums (for various reasons), so it must be taken into account, since you want this to be accurate. The average should come out to something, with a really long decimal attached to it. Then you could round. However, 40 is not a decimal, plus its a perfectly round number, there is no way that you did not estimate every aspect of your calculation.
TL;DR: That average is BS.
Last edited by KingOfTheOzone (Aug 28 2014 11:12:41 am)
Offline
Let's pretend a active user post 10 times per day, 1 topic each 5 days and get a warning per month.
It's so bad that a lot of peoples don't know what means this word.
This is a false statement.
Offline
don't you get it you guys? it's a pseudomath topic.
[ Started around 1738558666.239 - Generated in 0.078 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.51 MiB (Peak: 1.67 MiB) ]