Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Slopes:
Tests (with results!)
Test #1 : Result : the smiley has less speed going up the slope.
Test #2 : Result : smiley has more speed going down the slope (reduced when not moving, but not to normal)
Test #3 : Result : remaining jump hieght gets translated into moving right/left when jumping.
Test #4 : Result : the smiley falls down the pit, OR, if the player jumps, he can move easily over the gap (bonus distance = [x.10 per slope block {adds up}])
Test #5 : Result : the smiley slides across the gap, over it, without even jumping.
Hope this improves EE
~mrmario4563
I believe this has already been suggested.
inb4lock
^Months ago, saying that was considered spam.
What Monstar43 said.
Can they fit if they jump in test #3?
i like this, but it was already suggested
Last edited by dol257 (May 22 2011 12:52:07 am)
Can they fit if they jump in test #3?
The smiley can fit into the slope if it is at least 1 block above the opening.
Sry, i didn't see it was suggested.
While slopes have been suggested, I don't feel that's a reason for a warning or lock of this thread. He introduced new physics to this idea (which I, personally, like), so that's an idea in itself, I suppose.
I hate tall signatures.
Offline
bigfatsnoozy, don't make spam posts like "inb4lock" this is your 3rd warning resulting in a day ban.
As for the idea, I like it but the reason it won't be implanted is "Slopes are not recognizable on the minimap" iirc
A pretty stupid reason in my opinion
Offline
Offline
Although they have already been suggested before... still a great idea!
gravedig and why wasn't this locked. READ. THE. RULES.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732411692.8181 - Generated in 0.039 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.6 MiB) ]