Official Everybody Edits Forums

Hexagon

Member

Joined: 2015-04-22

Posts: 1,213

[Question] sdk or command-line based version of WPE Pro

It appears that using WPE Pro to send packets to EE is much faster than sending them using the PlayerIO API SDK. However, WPE Pro requires a GUI, and possibly Firefox (or another internet browser with flash) running at the same time. When running all of these programs on a server, it is a bit resource-intensive, and limits what servers this can be run on.
Is it possible to reproduce the functionality of WPE Pro using an sdk without a GUI (like a TCP packet filter)?

---

???

XxAtillaxX

Member

Joined: 2015-11-28

Posts: 4,202

Re: [Question] sdk or command-line based version of WPE Pro

It shouldn't be that much faster. You could possibly inject into the browser and then take control over that established socket and send in packet data using EEDecode classes or similar (though, nobody else made a PlayerIO message class)

---

*u stinky*

Zumza

Member

From: root

Joined: 2015-02-17

Posts: 4,662

Re: [Question] sdk or command-line based version of WPE Pro

They did, they didn't publish.

---

Warning!
This user has been found guilty by The Committee of Truth of using honesty, and reminding people of the past, without permission and outside of the allotted timeframes.

I’ve been asked if I’m ChatGPT5.
The answer is no.
I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.

Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

Kaslai

Guest

Re: [Question] sdk or command-line based version of WPE Pro

You could probably use reflection to access the network socket directly within the PlayerIO library. You would then be able to send raw information as fast as you wanted, just like with WPEPro, but with no need for anything other than standard bot libraries.