Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
guynm
#1: REJECTED: Well, not bad for the first try, but I think that you don't understand the rules clearly. The width is just way too off, and there is a "sneaky" part in it (and even a block that's alone ). Don't worry, some of your ideas may be used, though.
Muftwin
All: REJECTED: No, no, no, no! Just no... I think that I didn't write the rules clearly enough. Anyway, thanks for silently informing me about that, I'll try to make it more understandable soon. All of your patterns are either not good when scrolling, sneaking, or have breaks. I'm very sorry, but I can't even try to fix those... :/
patience is key
#1: REJECTED: You guys have probably misunderstood the width/height guides. 13 isn't the actual height, there are 3 nothing blocks above and 2+1 [nothing+arrows] below. The pattern isn't too lucky when scrolling also, and it has "sneaking".
guynm
#1: REJECTED: Well, not bad for the first try, but I think that you don't understand the rules clearly. The width is just way too off, and there is a "sneaky" part in it (and even a block that's alone ). Don't worry, some of your ideas may be used, though.Muftwin
All: REJECTED: No, no, no, no! Just no... I think that I didn't write the rules clearly enough. Anyway, thanks for silently informing me about that, I'll try to make it more understandable soon. All of your patterns are either not good when scrolling, sneaking, or have breaks. I'm very sorry, but I can't even try to fix those... :/patience is key
#1: REJECTED: You guys have probably misunderstood the width/height guides. 13 isn't the actual height, there are 3 nothing blocks above and 2+1 [nothing+arrows] below. The pattern isn't too lucky when scrolling also, and it has "sneaking".
What about me? Am I that bad?
why what! i really dont understand whats wrong with them...? imo there better than my first set and they got accepted as the quote "best ones nyet"
why what! i really dont understand whats wrong with them...? imo there better than my first set and they got accepted as the quote "best ones nyet"
Because the way you have them, there are breaks and that isn't allowed and there are also blocks not attached to the static.
I am officially a moron then.
Thank you for your feedback.
New submission:
http://everybodyedits.com/games/PW26csd1E6bEI
Last edited by Arceus64 (May 5 2012 11:03:53 am)
What about me? Am I that bad?
Whoops! Sorry for forgetting you... Of course I'll re-review your and KanibalFrost's patterns ASAP
BTW I won't mention the modifications anymore...
EDIT:
Aedan
#1: ACCEPTED
#2: REJECTED: Too hard, and not too unique.
#3: ACCEPTED
KanibalFrost
#1: ACCEPTED
#2: ACCEPTED
#3: REJECTED: Pretty much the same as the old, but extended the parts we don't really need...[/b]
Last edited by Jojatekok (May 5 2012 11:51:16 am)
Hummm diamonds, ima give you some patterns, jojatekoks love patterns
1) "overused already tides"
2) "wut wut overused arroes"
3) "humm moar arroes"
4) "the string of death"
Note: This isn't a joke. It is actually possible by standing between red and green bgs. If jojatekok fixes this it may not be possibru. And I guess this breaks the rules already, but could be fun too
5) "catch the rope"
Last edited by AsurcH (May 5 2012 11:22:26 am)
Offline
i dont see mine DX
Well... Me and Wambo made 48 Hope you like
Special thanks to Wambo for helping me make them
Last edited by zakleo (May 5 2012 11:37:50 am)
Muftwin wrote:why what! i really dont understand whats wrong with them...? imo there better than my first set and they got accepted as the quote "best ones nyet"
Because the way you have them, there are breaks and that isn't allowed and there are also blocks not attached to the static.
what does "having a break" and " not being attached to the static" mean
@zakleo.
48 patterns mean nothing if nobody can try out even one! Try placing a spawnpoint and make the level playable.
PS: THIS IS MY 1000TH POST!!!
Last edited by KanibalFrost (May 5 2012 1:23:04 pm)
Aedan wrote:Muftwin wrote:why what! i really dont understand whats wrong with them...? imo there better than my first set and they got accepted as the quote "best ones nyet"
Because the way you have them, there are breaks and that isn't allowed and there are also blocks not attached to the static.
what does "having a break" and " not being attached to the static" mean
http://everybodyedits.com/games/PWQhFLeWc5bEI
The red bg and red beta block wouldn't be allowed in this example because they are not attached.
so what was the problem with 1st one...i assume all that means is everything has to be attached to everything else...which is kinda of a pointless rule but ok...
Last edited by Muftwin (May 5 2012 1:54:04 pm)
Offline
Arceus64
#1: ACCEPTED
AsurcH
#1: REJECTED: Another good idea I can see... If there is a ceiling, and the game wouldn't scroll, that would be a perfect pattern!
#2: REJECTED: Hell yeah, overused arrows... That wouldn't even be enjoyable, sorry. :/
#3: REJECTED: Bad when scrolling, and too much arrows.
#4: Purely genius. Really. I think that it isn't good to use glitches at the moment, but we may use that later if we're really out of ideas. I don't want to judge that by a red or a green text, because I don't know how to decide.
ktostam450
#1: ACCEPTED
#2: REJECTED: Roaming, and too much arrows. It would fit Shift much more than this.
#3: REJECTED: This is when I say 'Awwwww'. It has got very little faults (2 blocks next to each other, too long), but besides that, it would be fine. Please try to improve and re-submit it!
Soulrunner (sorry for being late)
All: REJECTED: Too long, boring, unoriginal, and doesn't fit the system.
Wambo and zakleo - Special thanks for that amount in that time! o.O
#1: ACCEPTED
#2: ACCEPTED only a little part.
#3: REJECTED: Too long, and not good when scrolling.
#4: REJECTED: Doesn't follow the rules, and unoriginal.
#5: ACCEPTED a part.
#6: REJECTED: Only some boring traps.
#7: ACCEPTED a part.
#8: REJECTED: Good concept, but not so good when scrolling.
#9: ACCEPTED a part.
#10, #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #19, #20, #30, #33, #35, #38, #43, #44, #46, #47, #48: REJECTED: Not bad for static levels, but I think that they wouldn't work so well at Y!S.
#14: ACCEPTED
#17: REJECTED: No ending?!
#18, #40: REJECTED: Boooriiiiing...
#21, #25, #27, #28, #31, #32, #36, #41, #42: REJECTED: Almost the same as the others.
#22: REJECTED: But almost accepted. Nice build, but with too many arrows. We may use it in the future...
#23, #34: ACCEPTED without questions.
#24, #26: REJECTED: Don't use the ceiling! It may not be there in the game.
#29: REJECTED: Too easy, piece o'cake!
#37: ACCEPTED
#39: REJECTED: Just some easy and unoriginal boring traps.
#45: REJECTED: Pretty good, but I think that we already have look-alikes of that.
Last edited by Jojatekok (May 6 2012 1:53:40 am)
Here are my submissions, They are really easy I didn't want to make them too hard, Enjoy. (:
Level: Yo!Scroll Submissions
Here are the pics of my three levels. (:
1:
2:
3:
(:
lurking
Offline
Nice xJeex!
OFF TOPIC: coool Gtaa you're finally joining forums
ON TOPIC: OK KanibalFrost I'll put a spawn point in mah world
EDIT: Oh em gee, I went on my world to put a spawn point, and just left completely forgetting about the spawn...
Last edited by zakleo (May 6 2012 3:43:04 am)
http://everybodyedits.com/games/PWjIcYLlaSbEI Lvl 3, trying again
BG's and decos are optional.
Zakleo, how are you meant to play them?
Well i see you have many ideas guys ^^ I like to edit accepted suggestion, that gives me sth to do when im bored
I hope more cool patterns will come soon.
Offline
Yay, I got accepted!
ktostam450
#3: REJECTED: Sorry, but that's also "only" a "typical trap-level variant". :/
xJeex (another great spawn area, thanks, I'm obliged to copy and test them somewhere else, nice tactics, guys )
All: ACCEPTED: Nice work!
[ Started around 1739018765.3019 - Generated in 0.151 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.79 MiB (Peak: 2.05 MiB) ]