Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

Donate!

pls donate


#1 2019-02-09 23:35:04

Muftwin
Member
Joined: 2015-02-27
Posts: 524

Underwater

should people whos houses are underwater have to pay a larger water bill? I say yes it only makes sense. Someone who thinks no might say the people are already poor it would be ok to forgive them for using extra water.


hNtlhM5.png
ZOEY DOESNT ACCEPT MY GENDER IDENTITY SMH

Offline

Wooted by:

#2 2019-02-09 23:45:17

Luka504
Member
From: Serbia,probs never heard of it
Joined: 2015-02-19
Posts: 2,477

Re: Underwater

Yeah I agree. Can you imagine how much it must cost to transfer water down there?


How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

Luka504.png

Offline

Wooted by:

#3 2019-02-10 00:30:32

NorwegianboyEE
Member
From: Norway
Joined: 2015-03-16
Posts: 1,761

Re: Underwater

dam ur mind is on a whole new level from the rest of us.


L1dl6nb.gif

Offline

Wooted by:

#4 2019-02-10 01:03:33

Tomahawk
Forum Mod
From: BiH
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 2,137

Re: Underwater

Nah, it would be cheaper. There's 3 parts to a water bill:

  1. For fresh water piped to your home;

  2. For waste water piped away from your home;

  3. For dealing with surface water that drains from your property into the sewer.

3 wouldn't apply, and maybe you could filter the water around your house to avoid needing 1, making the total bill about 70% cheaper.


One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.

Offline

Wooted by:
Tomahawk1549757013740613

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1569004585.9675 - Generated in 0.022 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.29 MiB (Peak: 1.41 MiB) ]