Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
should people whos houses are underwater have to pay a larger water bill? I say yes it only makes sense. Someone who thinks no might say the people are already poor it would be ok to forgive them for using extra water.
ZOEY DOESNT ACCEPT ANYTHING
Offline
dam ur mind is on a whole new level from the rest of us.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Nah, it would be cheaper. There's 3 parts to a water bill:
For fresh water piped to your home;
For waste water piped away from your home;
For dealing with surface water that drains from your property into the sewer.
3 wouldn't apply, and maybe you could filter the water around your house to avoid needing 1, making the total bill about 70% cheaper.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732359288.0552 - Generated in 0.053 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.41 MiB (Peak: 1.52 MiB) ]