Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Username is heny6868
when he goes into levels he advertises his levels. not normally, he uses a program to rapidly post the same link over and over and over the user can not kick him but if you wish to see
http://everybodyedits.com/games/PWvhY6AvU8a0I
its actually henky6868
Offline
oops, damn my dyslexia!
And also ban **** please!
wow. Triple post. In a topic about banning another user..
oh the irony!
Offline
wow. Triple post. In a topic about banning another user..
oh the irony!
its not a triple post examine closer *hands magnifying glass*
shouldn't this be moved here? >http://eeforumify.com/viewtopic.php?id=3309
its a list of people to ban.
Offline
^ I think a better question would be shouldn't this thread be deleted? He provided absolutely no proof of the accused doing anything, and what he accused was hardly against the rules of EE.
dude, i posted the link, if hes gone its not my fault, think!
How does that level prove anything? As far as I can see, it's completely irrelevant; the level says it was made by "whiteboy," whereas you're accusing "henny6868." And let's not forget that it's a level, which can never prove anything about a user.
ITS NOT ABOUT THE LEVEL GENIUS
ITS ABOUT A CHAT SPAMMER.
/learn to read
Hey! Look!
Last edited by CookiezEater (May 21 2011 6:36:01 pm)
STOP POSTING PEOPLE TO BAN HERE!!! All people you think should be banned must go here.
Ok! ill post there! *cries in corner*
ITS NOT ABOUT THE LEVEL GENIUS
ITS ABOUT A CHAT SPAMMER.
/learn to read
I was referring to the level as your attempt at proving your accusation. /Learn to read.
Spamming chat technically isn't against the rules, and certainly isn't a bannable offense.
Should be in the "lists of users to ban"
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1715733142.6469 - Generated in 0.073 seconds, 10 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.51 MiB (Peak: 1.67 MiB) ]