Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

Pages: 1 2

#1 Re: Off Topic Discussion » What disability do you have? » 2016-08-09 22:32:17

Twipply
The Party Animal wrote:
Twipply wrote:

None. I am perfect.

no one is perfect im pretty sure you have a flaw like yo life

The closest thing I have to a flaw is that I'm too perfect.

#2 Re: Off Topic Discussion » What disability do you have? » 2016-08-09 21:25:01

Twipply

None. I am perfect.

#3 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Game of Thrones/ASOIAF » 2015-06-11 22:34:31

Twipply
Zoey2070 wrote:

how bout that CLEGANEBOWLLLLLLLLLLL?

No.

Also, Jon Snow is totally Azor Ahai reborn and not Stannis the Mannis.

#4 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Game of Thrones/ASOIAF » 2015-06-10 00:14:49

Twipply
Insanity wrote:

fk you stannis i hope u die

Bruh be nice to Stannis the Mannis he's the true King.

Insanity wrote:

also lord baelish 4lyfe

Petyr Baelish confirmed as owning the fastest pony in Westeros.

#5 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Game of Thrones/ASOIAF » 2015-06-09 23:24:41

Twipply
Breadfinn wrote:

Brandon Stark steals one dragon and rides on it.

Don't you mean Benjen Stark? -tinfoil-

#6 Off Topic Discussion » Game of Thrones/ASOIAF » 2015-06-09 22:23:48

Twipply
Replies: 15

Discuss Game of Thrones or A Song of Ice and Fire here. Tag spoilers for season 5/ADWD.


Stannis shall sit the Iron Throne, Shireen will sit by his side and one day become a beautiful Queen herself.

Dany and Jorah the Explorer are the one true couple.

Barristan the Bold is the biggest badass to have ever walked the face of the planet.

Btw I've only seen up to S05E07 so eh.

#7 Re: Off Topic Discussion » 1+2+3+4+5+... = -1/12 ??? » 2015-04-06 16:11:57

Twipply
Ratburntro44 wrote:

The only thing thing that makes this impressive is using the unqualified term "sum" to refer to a specific type of sum that it would not be normally used to mean and then using extraneous proofs to demonstrate things that are only actually true in a specific context.

Waow.

Lionhart wrote:

Is it rigorous? No, but that does not make it the trash that you are describing

Sry bro it's trash.

#8 Re: Off Topic Discussion » How fast can you count a minute? » 2015-03-23 15:33:54

Twipply
gkaby wrote:

count a minute

Am I retarded? Or does this actually just not make any sense whatsoever.

#9 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Math help? c: » 2015-03-20 23:21:34

Twipply
Sybil wrote:

i don't know why you're getting help from the internet, especially here lmao

Maybe because a vast number of people online are very, very good at maths and can answer this with ease? Even some of them on here.

#10 Re: Bots and Programming » Wpe PRO can't work » 2015-03-14 16:41:43

Twipply

The best answer I got to this was along the lines of "It's encrypted now!!!" Depending on what you actually want to do, Wireshark might be worth trying.

#11 Re: Game Discussion » Official Contest Results Complaining Topic » 2015-03-13 21:28:40

Twipply

I can't believe I didn't win - clearly this whole thing was rigged from the start.

#12 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Taking applications for new waifu » 2015-03-11 15:40:56

Twipply
Fe wrote:

So, Twipply, does one of the requirements of being a waifu involve the loss of an arm from around the elbow?

is this you? If so, I might have to do some reconsidering.

#13 Re: Game Discussion » How do you think the Everybody Edits Staff is doing? [Survey included] » 2015-03-11 02:27:51

Twipply

Are you really asking for potentially negative opinions about the 'staff' while also wanting usernames? This doesn't seem to promote honesty or variety to me.

#14 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Opinions on Marijunana Consumption » 2015-03-08 21:30:18

Twipply
tentacleTherapist wrote:

Cannabis smoke contains twice the concentration of carcinogenic substances.

http://www.nhs.uk/news/2012/06june/Pages/cannabis-lung-health-risks-underestimated.aspx wrote:

This means that cannabis smoke has the same carcinogens (substances that cause cancer) as tobacco smoke, although concentrations of these may be up to 50% higher.

Lol. Don't worry, I'm done now.

#15 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Opinions on Marijunana Consumption » 2015-03-08 21:04:38

Twipply
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2516340/ wrote:

There were 79 cases of lung cancer and 324 controls. The risk of lung cancer increased 8% (95% CI 2% to 15%) for each joint-year of cannabis smoking, after adjustment for confounding variables including cigarette smoking, and 7% (95% CI 5% to 9%) for each pack-year of cigarette smoking, after adjustment for confounding variables including cannabis smoking. The highest tertile of cannabis use was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer RR=5.7 (95% CI 1.5 to 21.6), after adjustment for confounding variables including cigarette smoking.

This doesn't seem to fit either of your two claims I quoted.

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-c … use-cancer
This doesn't seem to fit either of your two claims I quoted.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12412839
This doesn't seem to fit either of your two claims I quoted.

http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/64/6/1943
This doesn't seem to fit either of your two claims I quoted.

I'm either missing where each of these sources backs up the "Cannabis smoke contains twice the concentration of carcinogenic substances." or "[Cannabis is] 50% more likely to cause a tumor than tobacco" claims you made, or you're full of HAPPINESS AND JOY TO THE WORLD. Admittedly, I did only skim them with a few ctrl f's, but that's because you linked me to a bunch of articles rather than actually citing a source for what you said.

Which is it?

#16 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Opinions on Marijunana Consumption » 2015-03-08 20:22:03

Twipply
Insanity wrote:

Also, people don't smoke weed for life. You can quit anytime, anywhere.

You might want to look up the difference between mental and physical addiction.

#17 Re: Bots and Programming » Dumb question » 2015-03-08 20:19:25

Twipply
Vitalijus wrote:

No, it would freeze everything becouse thread would be sleeping for infinite time.

Vitalijus wrote:

how can I stop closing application after "ENTER" key button?

Do you see how these are the same thing now I've pointed it out? Once again, if you want programming help, you should post your god damn code.

#18 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Opinions on Marijunana Consumption » 2015-03-08 20:13:52

Twipply
Anak wrote:

Instead of trying to be a smartypants, you might've better spent the time more deeply evaluating the tone with which I made my post.

Here's some time to think about it, beware the upcoming spoilers!

Yes, that's right, I wasn't really being serious. I wanted him to go try find his sources so he'd either realise he's talking snickerdoodles, or I'd be able to tell him he's talking snickerdoodles. Really, thanks though, I never knew this "Google" website existed until now! (See how I did it again there? I think it might be called sarcasm, maybe you can "Google" it for me)

#19 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Opinions on Marijunana Consumption » 2015-03-08 20:01:33

Twipply
tentacleTherapist wrote:

Cannabis smoke contains twice the concentration of carcinogenic substances. It is a huge misconception that Cannabis helps cancer as it is 50% more likely to cause a tumor than tobacco.

Well isn't that interesting. I'd sure love to see a source for these claims!

#20 Re: Bots and Programming » Dumb question » 2015-03-08 14:24:54

Twipply
Koya wrote:

Depending on your personal preference, I have 2 solutions

...

Seems a little excessive to spawn a new thread just for a while loop that could happily exist within main, no?
Really, I don't know why OP hasn't just posted code yet.

#21 Re: Bots and Programming » Dumb question » 2015-03-08 01:35:49

Twipply

If you want help with your programming, you should probably show us the relevant part of your code.

Zumza wrote:

Or if you just don't want it to close on enter:

static void Main(string[] args){
     <code>
     do{
     }while(true);
}

Do I receive a woot? //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/big_smile

No. Doing this will pin one of your CPU cores at 100% while the program is running.

#22 Re: Creative » EE Logo » 2015-03-07 15:35:23

Twipply

Really you guys? I'm so glad to hear EE is alive now, I never knew. Here, I stayed up all night with this one, but I think I managed to come up with something we can all enjoy.

http://i.imgur.com/GJHxOKz.png

#23 Creative » EE Logo » 2015-03-07 03:12:02

Twipply
Replies: 5

I think I can say I've been an artist for about 15 years now. I originally started with painting, but I find it a little time consuming (and expensive!) with all the setup required, etc. So, I've decided to transition into mainly digital painting. I've only been going for a few months now, so my digital skills aren't quite up to my real life painting standards, but I definitely think I'm improving. I'd love to know what some of you guys think, so I decided to design a nice little logo for EE just to keep things relevant to the forum.

All comments and criticisms are welcome.

http://i.imgur.com/jRoaDYG.png

#24 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Taking applications for new waifu » 2015-03-07 03:06:52

Twipply
iPwner wrote:

Get off my wife.

Applications closed a few days early. I think it's obvious who I'm meant to be with.

<3

#25 Re: Off Topic Discussion » Taking applications for new waifu » 2015-03-05 22:13:56

Twipply
Boh wrote:
iPwner wrote:

Dear Twipply,
I'd really love to

GO OUT

with you!

That'd be pretty high maintenance for Twipply.

Didn't I just say I needed some more hot wommenz? And instead I get sent you? Maybe work on your appearance a little more instead of trying to **** block me and I might let you apply one day.

Pages: 1 2

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1714337501.447 - Generated in 0.082 seconds, 9 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.73 MiB (Peak: 1.99 MiB) ]