Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#26 Before February 2015

xputnameherex
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

Zacoist wrote:

Too late.. :3

This, sadly.

WevBh.png

#27 Before February 2015

Pugmatt
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

Meh, I don't know, it depends, I don't find many fun in hook jumps at all, but it's a possibility.

#28 Before February 2015

scienceguyz
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

#29 Before February 2015

Cola1
Member
From: We will meet again as stars
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 3,281

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

No. Just No.

        N O
x      N O
______
N O O O


smilpat.gif
kQgdwOD.png

Offline

#30 Before February 2015

Stubby
Member
From: Maryland, U.S.A.
Joined: 2015-02-16
Posts: 1,721
Website

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

xputnameherex wrote:
Zacoist wrote:

Too late.. :3

This, sadly.

WevBh.png


fgRzols.png

Offline

#31 Before February 2015

little owl
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

they will go from:
??
    ?
    ?
??
    ?
    ?
??
    ?
    ?
??
To like this:
??              ??
    ?                 ?
    ?                 ?
??              ??
????????

#32 Before February 2015

scienceguyz
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

little owl wrote:

they will go from:
??
    ?
    ?
??
    ?
    ?
??
    ?
    ?
??
To like this:
??              ??
    ?                 ?
    ?                 ?
??              ??
????????

well this:
??              ??
    ?                 ?
    ?                 ?
??              ??
is easier because you can't fall down several jumps. and you can jump from the top of the jump to the top of the next one. noobs don't buy coindoors to make sure people don't cheat.

#33 Before February 2015

32OrtonEdge32dh
Member
From: DMV
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 5,166
Website

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

I don't think you understand, Squad, how annoying capitalizing every letter in a sentence is.   It's even worse than using horrid spelling and/or grammar.   In fact, it's technically bad grammar anyway.


32ortonedge32dh.gif

Offline

#34 Before February 2015

Drew12345
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

^ youknow i never noticed that   until someone pointed it out so whatever

and ive never really hated hookjumps so...

#35 Before February 2015

Garfield2436
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

Certain type of hookjumps like EX Crew illusion in my opinion are okay.
Row of hookjumps, I want to eat a burrito instead.

#36 Before February 2015

supadorf24
Member
Joined: 2015-02-26
Posts: 2,675

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

Typing Like This is Annoying and an Abomination of the English Language.

Offline

#37 Before February 2015

Jasonma
Guest

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

people would troll it... some people make hook jumps just to annoy people.

#38 Before February 2015

Onjit
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 9,709
Website

Re: ~Shall We Give Hookjumps Another Chance?~

scienceguyz wrote:
little owl wrote:

they will go from:
??
    ?
    ?
??
    ?
    ?
??
    ?
    ?
??
To like this:
??              ??
    ?                 ?
    ?                 ?
??              ??
????????

well this:
??              ??
    ?                 ?
    ?                 ?
??              ??
is easier because you can't fall down several jumps. and you can jump from the top of the jump to the top of the next one. noobs don't buy coindoors to make sure people don't cheat.

Actually they'll become this:

?????????????
             ?
??        ?         ??
    ?      ?              ?
    ?      ?              ?
??                    ??
?????????????


:.|:;

Offline

Koya142389694964483

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1731694423.7365 - Generated in 0.052 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.52 MiB (Peak: 1.68 MiB) ]