Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
what was the reason
Offline
hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!
http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png
lrussell plz
Consider this an informal warning: this thread is about EE Administrators, do not discuss mod behavior here.
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
I really don't know why EE is dead. So much drama is just a good show for new comers!
what was the reason
you could always re-login
forum staff with their ad revenue rn
hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!
http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png
lrussell plz
the rec world?
did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?
Offline
MrJaWapa wrote:hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!
http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png
lrussell plz
the rec world?
did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?
he usually kicks people for that, not ban
Pingohits wrote:MrJaWapa wrote:hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!
http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png
lrussell plz
the rec world?
did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?
he usually kicks people for that, not ban
then i assume jawapa didn't just troll coins, he must have done something more
if jawapa truly did simply spam a couple of coins around and received a ban, then that should be something to discuss
Offline
Ernesdo wrote:Pingohits wrote:MrJaWapa wrote:hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!
http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png
lrussell plz
the rec world?
did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?
he usually kicks people for that, not ban
then i assume jawapa didn't just troll coins, he must have done something more
if jawapa truly did simply spam a couple of coins around and received a ban, then that should be something to discuss
Or he just posted a screenshot of him trying to rejoin the world within 5 minutes. Even if you get kicked it will still say banned if you try to re-enter the world within the time limit.
Offline
screw this topic it sucks
Offline
proc, just so you don't play the victim card anymore and whine about me attacking you and nobody else:
maybe i'll post stupid **** that the other admins/mods do when they do something stupid
Okay thanks.
Since Jawapa censored a lot of my statements (again, how surprising!), let me add the missing ones:
[20:14:15] <Proc> atillabyte idc how long the initial ban was
[20:14:35] <atillabyte> then you don't care about the context of previous warnings
[20:14:59] <atillabyte> Proc, which is ironic and hypocritical since you permabanned ninja or whatever
[20:15:05] <atillabyte> for repeatedly breaking rules
[...]
02:42:00 <atillabyte> Proc, well originally you said you didn't care how long the initial ban was and then said that
02:42:47 <Proc> i didn't care how long the original ban was, it is always very bad to ban evade
02:42:59 <Proc> how bad the ban evasion is, is very personal
[20:18:34] <Proc> if someone ban evades Ill be more open to a perma ban
[20:18:45] <Proc> than any other rule breaking
02:19:48 <N1KF> Proc, what is the point then, if they can just evade their bans?
02:20:26 <Proc> The point is that ban evasion renders our punishment system useless
[...]
02:22:16 <Proc> atillabyte: we rehablitate our users by bans, if the ban system is circumvented, we cannot rehablitate so a perma ban can come in question
02:23:50 <atillabyte> if your ban system is already rendered useless
02:24:31 <atillabyte> then your solution is not one at all
02:24:43 <Proc> but it is our way of saying "**** you, we don't want you to play our game anymore"
02:25:03 <atillabyte> Proc, they are already ban evading so that **** you means absolutely nothing
02:24:59 <Proc> atillabyte it saves staff time
02:25:11 <Proc> to not reban those who will bypass anyway
[20:14:39] <Proc> ban evasion is the worst of all crimes
[...]
02:34:17 <Proc> because guess what, you don't show regret by evading your ban
---
02:36:19 <Proc> atillabyte i shortended it to 24 hours
02:36:22 <Proc> yojr point being?
02:36:47 <atillabyte> Proc, the one said by ninja?
02:37:01 <Proc> yes atillabyte
02:37:25 <atillabyte> Proc, he wrote that the original ban was 24 hours
02:37:40 <Proc> yes atillabyte, now 48 hours
02:38:19 <atillabyte> Proc, much more reasonable than the 15 days
02:38:27 <Proc> thanks atillabyte
[...]
02:44:57 <atillabyte> but the issue is that 15 days for evading 24 hours is unreasonable
02:45:02 <Proc> alright
02:45:05 <Proc> i agree
02:45:10 <Proc> so i decreased it
02:45:13 <Proc> to 1 day
02:45:23 <Proc> what's the issue now
02:45:28 <atillabyte> Proc, none
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
[ Started around 1732109330.2084 - Generated in 0.040 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.56 MiB (Peak: 1.72 MiB) ]