Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#101 2016-10-16 03:57:08

Schlog
Member
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,957

Re: The Staff of EE

what was the reason

Offline

Wooted by:

#102 2016-10-16 10:11:28

Processor
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,246

Re: The Staff of EE

MrJaWapa wrote:

hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!

http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png

lrussell plz //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/sad

Consider this an informal warning: this thread is about EE Administrators, do not discuss mod behavior here.


I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.

Offline

#103 2016-10-16 10:23:50

Anatoly
Guest

Re: The Staff of EE

I really don't know why EE is dead. So much drama is just a good show for new comers!

#104 2016-10-16 10:25:21

Nebula
Guest

Re: The Staff of EE

Ninja wrote:

what was the reason

you could always re-login

#105 2016-10-16 14:55:03

Guest.
Guest

Re: The Staff of EE

forum staff with their ad revenue rn
z9mH9fc.gif

#106 2016-10-16 14:56:13

Pingohits
Banned
From: aids lizard
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 7,591

Re: The Staff of EE

MrJaWapa wrote:

hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!

http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png

lrussell plz //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/sad

the rec world?

did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?


791mAP8.png

Offline

#107 2016-10-16 15:01:30

Guest.
Guest

Re: The Staff of EE

Pingohits wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:

hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!

http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png

lrussell plz //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/sad

the rec world?

did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?

he usually kicks people for that, not ban

#108 2016-10-16 15:05:56

Pingohits
Banned
From: aids lizard
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 7,591

Re: The Staff of EE

Ernesdo wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:

hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!

http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png

lrussell plz //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/sad

the rec world?

did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?

he usually kicks people for that, not ban

then i assume jawapa didn't just troll coins, he must have done something more

if jawapa truly did simply spam a couple of coins around and received a ban, then that should be something to discuss


791mAP8.png

Offline

Wooted by:

#109 2016-10-16 15:21:49

rgl32
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 543

Re: The Staff of EE

Pingohits wrote:
Ernesdo wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:

hey so I was just in lrussell's world, just minding my own business, trolling coins, having fun, and WHAM!

http://mrjawapa.com/img/516f0a1d.png

lrussell plz //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/sad

the rec world?

did you not read the signs in the beginning, where one of them said, "NO TROLLING"?

he usually kicks people for that, not ban

then i assume jawapa didn't just troll coins, he must have done something more

if jawapa truly did simply spam a couple of coins around and received a ban, then that should be something to discuss

Or he just posted a screenshot of him trying to rejoin the world within 5 minutes. Even if you get kicked it will still say banned if you try to re-enter the world within the time limit.

Offline

#110 2016-10-16 17:09:41, last edited by Schlog (2016-10-16 17:13:24)

Schlog
Member
Joined: 2015-07-21
Posts: 1,957

Re: The Staff of EE

screw this topic it sucks

Offline

Wooted by:

#111 2016-10-16 17:32:12

Processor
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 2,246

Re: The Staff of EE

Ninja wrote:

proc, just so you don't play the victim card anymore and whine about me attacking you and nobody else:

maybe i'll post stupid **** that the other admins/mods do when they do something stupid

Okay thanks.

Since Jawapa censored a lot of my statements (again, how surprising!), let me add the missing ones:

MrJaWapa wrote:

[20:14:15] <Proc> atillabyte idc how long the initial ban was
[20:14:35] <atillabyte> then you don't care about the context of previous warnings
[20:14:59] <atillabyte> Proc, which is ironic and hypocritical since you permabanned ninja or whatever
[20:15:05] <atillabyte> for repeatedly breaking rules

[...]
02:42:00 <atillabyte> Proc, well originally you said you didn't care how long the initial ban was and then said that
02:42:47 <Proc> i didn't care how long the original ban was, it is always very bad to ban evade
02:42:59 <Proc> how bad the ban evasion is, is very personal

MrJaWapa wrote:

[20:18:34] <Proc> if someone ban evades Ill be more open to a perma ban
[20:18:45] <Proc> than any other rule breaking

02:19:48 <N1KF> Proc, what is the point then, if they can just evade their bans?
02:20:26 <Proc> The point is that ban evasion renders our punishment system useless
[...]
02:22:16 <Proc> atillabyte: we rehablitate our users by bans, if the ban system is circumvented, we cannot rehablitate so a perma ban can come in question
02:23:50 <atillabyte> if your ban system is already rendered useless
02:24:31 <atillabyte> then your solution is not one at all
02:24:43 <Proc> but it is our way of saying "**** you, we don't want you to play our game anymore"
02:25:03 <atillabyte> Proc, they are already ban evading so that **** you means absolutely nothing
02:24:59 <Proc> atillabyte it saves staff time
02:25:11 <Proc> to not reban those who will bypass anyway


MrJaWapa wrote:

[20:14:39] <Proc> ban evasion is the worst of all crimes

[...]
02:34:17 <Proc> because guess what, you don't show regret by evading your ban

---

02:36:19 <Proc> atillabyte i shortended it to 24 hours
02:36:22 <Proc> yojr point being?
02:36:47 <atillabyte> Proc, the one said by ninja?
02:37:01 <Proc> yes atillabyte
02:37:25 <atillabyte> Proc, he wrote that the original ban was 24 hours
02:37:40 <Proc> yes atillabyte, now 48 hours
02:38:19 <atillabyte> Proc, much more reasonable than the 15 days
02:38:27 <Proc> thanks atillabyte
[...]
02:44:57 <atillabyte> but the issue is that 15 days for evading 24 hours is unreasonable
02:45:02 <Proc> alright
02:45:05 <Proc> i agree
02:45:10 <Proc> so i decreased it
02:45:13 <Proc> to 1 day
02:45:23 <Proc> what's the issue now
02:45:28 <atillabyte> Proc, none


I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.

Offline

Processor1476635532630220

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732110266.1355 - Generated in 0.055 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.56 MiB (Peak: 1.72 MiB) ]