Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Offline
Imo either luka or Gabrielle should ge lynched today.
Gabrielle is a throw away, since they haven't done anything, so I'd push for luka instead
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
Yeah which is exactly why I'm pressuring him to do something, so he wouldn't be a throwaway.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
why lynch inactive if youre nto sure thyere maf? also
!vote count
!time left
we really need to dsicuss woshould be gone
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
why lynch inactive if youre nto sure thyere maf? also
!vote count
!time left
we really need to dsicuss woshould be gone
Yeah. We have already discussed it. What do you think about a wagon on any of Andy/Luka/Gabriell? They are the main ones being suspected right now.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
why gabriel?
becuase hes inactive? i think weve said in earlie rgame inactivety issnt necresary scummotivated
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
I don't think Gabriel is necessarily a throwaway. Voting for Gabriel goes along the same lines of why Luka isn't voting for Andymakeer:
Andymakeer and Luka, while both having scummy attributes, are still contributing to the conversation. Gabriel didn't just say nothing, and that's why we're voting for him. Gabriel explicitly refused to contribute to the conversation until D2.
One of the reasons that I don't post before is because d1 seems pretty boring and dull with just people fighting each other , I would rather !endday like Allen said than seeing some dudes fighting because of mafia strategies
But, between Andy and Luka, I think Andy should be flipped. Luka is mostly suspicious for supporting the cop wagon, which is fair, but could lead either way (Correct me if I'm wrong, I did a run through of the thread and this is all I could find). Andy has been batting down conversation from the beginning. Basically calling all the conversation we had useless, and claiming that he's trying to help town move forward.
Personally, I'd rather have Gabriell flip over Andy. Or at the very least, pressure Gabriell to say something more than just refusing to talk D1, just for the hell of it. But in terms of a more substantial lynch, I'd much prefer an Andy lynch, since I think his scummy actions are longer lasting, and are more contradictory than Luka's.
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
why gabriel?
becuase hes inactive? i think weve said in earlie rgame inactivety issnt necresary scummotivated
We asked Gabriel to speak, and he basically responded with a post saying "I don't talk D1, because that's stupid" that's why he's being voted. Since it seems like a reason to just not talk and avoid being scumread.
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
Iβd rather vote a scummy player than an inactive player. Lynches on inactives are bad and if it flips town basically gives us nothing to work with the next day. While i agree with voting for pressure on principle, we really donβt have enough time for that anymore and that is why i think we should rather be voting Andymakeer right now.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
Heβs also a new player at mafia (?) which makes me believe his lurking could be indicative of noobiness and not necesarilly scum indicative.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
Iβd rather vote a scummy player than an inactive player. Lynches on inactives are bad and if it flips town basically gives us nothing to work with the next day. While i agree with voting for pressure on principle, we really donβt have enough time for that anymore and that is why i think we should rather be voting Andymakeer right now.
Makes sense, but I still want Gabriell to say something more than just refusing to speak. Once I get that I'll probably vote for Andy.
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
Iβd rather vote a scummy player than an inactive player. Lynches on inactives are bad and if it flips town basically gives us nothing to work with the next day. While i agree with voting for pressure on principle, we really donβt have enough time for that anymore and that is why i think we should rather be voting Andymakeer right now.
I'm down for lynching Andy because of the things that happened earlier today
On the other hand inactive players like Gabrielf shouldn't be carried into late game where every single player matters, so it is better that we discard him and players like him as soon as possible if he doesn't make up his mind and start participating in the game
Offline
NorwegianboyEE wrote:Iβd rather vote a scummy player than an inactive player. Lynches on inactives are bad and if it flips town basically gives us nothing to work with the next day. While i agree with voting for pressure on principle, we really donβt have enough time for that anymore and that is why i think we should rather be voting Andymakeer right now.
I'm down for lynching Andy because of the things that happened earlier today
On the other hand inactive players like Gabrielf shouldn't be carried into late game where every single player matters, so it is better that we discard him and players like him as soon as possible if he doesn't make up his mind and start participating in the game
I agree it sucks, but you can't keep the scummy dudes alive just because there are other slots not participating. People might disagree, but i don't think that's the best play for town in any situation really.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
I was not scummy at all.
You talk about "contributing" to a solution, but when I posted about nolynching I was called useless.
Then, I defended myself, now I'm scummy for doing that.
SOLVING THE GAME MUCH
But okay, I can repeat:
Too many potential deaths N1, if we accidentally lynch any town D1, PR or not, we'll be getting absolutely no information but also decreasing the pool as hell.
I'd love an opinion on this matter rather than just "HMMM NO THAT IS SCUM INDICATIVE BECAUSE I WANT IT TO BE"
F
Offline
Too many potential deaths N1, if we accidentally lynch any town D1, PR or not, we'll be getting absolutely no information but also decreasing the pool as hell.
If we accidentally lynch a townie that's not the end of the world and we do gain information by analyzing connections the dead townie had with other members, this sometimes goes as far as confirming other player(s) to be townie(s) which reduces the pool of lynch candidates and brings us closer to winning
Offline
Can i also mention that i have never seen Andymakeer so sassy and using smileys like this before? Can anyone confirm if this reminds me of town!Andy from previous games? Because this seems new to me.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
If we accidentally lynch a townie that's not the end of the world and we do gain information by analyzing connections the dead townie had with other members, this sometimes goes as far as confirming other player(s) to be townie(s) which reduces the pool of lynch candidates and brings us closer to winning
oh thank god, finally!!!
okay, so if I flip town, who would become your suspects?
Your attitude screams: "scum that is caught for the wrong reasons" and that's why your tone is so annoyed right now.
Well you avoided my question, again.
Neat.
I'm just playing the game, Mr Emperor.
F
Offline
Well you avoided my question, again.
What was your question? That we shouldn't lynch town D1? We get information even from a townflip. Because we can see which people on the wagon seemed genuine and who seemed opportunistic. That's my opinion on the matter.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
so sassy and using smileys like this before
Really?
Are you REALLY using this ridiculous point to create an argument to make me look scummy?
So posting smileys now is scum indicative, huh?
Well, looks like i'm the only scum the game
I wonder what happened with my partner...
F
Offline
The reason i'm scumreading you isn't just because of that. I've already stated multiple reasons why i scumread you. Let me go over them again Andy.
- You have no reads.
- You initially stated wanting to no lynch, but then suddenly said you were willing to follow "any wagon".
- Your statement about willingness to follow any wagon is completely against your purported ideology of not wanting to lynch town on day 1. (Something you stated later)
- You are overly defensive and seem more focused on your survival than solving.
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
- Oh and when some really interesting **** happened earlier between me/Luka all you could muster was "This is smokescreen". And then didn't even explain in detail the reason you had behind making that post. Just some vague statements about "they could be scum or SK or something".
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
Well, looks like i'm the only scum the game
I wonder what happened with my partner...
Idk what he's doing right now. Why don't you tell me who he is and why he isn't defending you so we can wrap this up early?
β
β β
β β
β β
β
Offline
[ Started around 1732285021.6596 - Generated in 0.202 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.83 MiB (Peak: 2.12 MiB) ]