Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Mind elaborating a bit? Do you agree with what I've said or not?
i mean, i guess i agree with you. i'd rather have another reason to lynch someone though that's not "they're usually a lurker". lynching someone just because they're lurking seems kinda bad. although i'm pretty sure that by the time day 1 ends, we'll have some other info
-Eleizibeth (Yes. Seems like another funposter à la JoeyC.)
ssorry if i am not up to your standards. i've never played a mafia game before and this is a really scary experience for me. please be patient, thanks :D
Offline
I'm suggesting slabdrill only if there aren't any better candidates. Apparently we have to lynch someone every day, so it's worth discussing the potential outcome where we don't have much information to make a decision.
Besides, it broke the ice and got the game out of the infamous early **** phase.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
I don't think we should be too hasty to lynch someone. We have 72 hours to decide who we want to lynch. So we can find a potential suspect to lynch. While the inactive players are the best option, at the moment, it might be the best option for us to hold off on lynching someone until we get more information. That way, if another suspect arises, for a reason different than just being inactive, we have a more likely candidate for a Mafia member.
I think the inactive players should only be lynched as a worst case scenario.
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
That way, if another suspect arises, for a reason different than just being inactive, we have a more likely candidate for a Mafia member.
How though? What do you expect to happen?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
I don't expect much. What I'm really hoping for is for more conversation on who to lynch to go on. So that we can determine more people's motives. I'm not against lynching an inactive person. I just don't think that it's the best option available.
Yes, it is the easiest option, at the moment, since we have no information on anyone, but to be frank, sometimes the easiest option isn't the best option. That's why I'm suggesting we hold off on lynching an inactive person so that we can lynch someone who is more likely to be Mafia, if that case arises.
In any case. I have to head off to school now. I'll be able to read the forums while I'm there, and post some stuff, but I won't be as talkative for the next 7 hours as I was these past few hours.
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
If you guys want to lynch an inactive person right off the bat, that's fine, I'm not going to force you to play the waiting game if you don't want to. But I want to give everyone at least the chance to talk, that way we can get some information from everyone, and possibly find someone who is more suspicious than just: "They're inactive."
Don't ask me what I'm doing, I don't even know what I'm doing.
~BeepnBoop
Offline
Uh, we can't do that. It's stated in the rules that one person has to be lynched every day. Unless Kira changed the rules, we can't just sit back.
Offline
Tant de pensées anti-révolutionnaires, je veux vous tous guillotiné!
Si triste que je dois choisir seulement une personne aujourd'hui.
Ce n'est pas le moment d'être modéré. Tout conservateur aura une priorité plus élevée pour l'éternel.
Vive la révolution!
Qui est avec moi?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
and possibly find someone who is more suspicious than just: "They're inactive."
Not just that, they can also be useless.
Though it is encouraging that one of them is at least attempting to make discussion of somewhat substance.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Zumza wrote:Qui est avec moi?
No
Bien sûr, bien sûr..
Suivez-moi.
J'ai une guillotine qui te conviendrait beaucoup, nouveau modèle, la mode parisienne!
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
I'm open for lynching slabdrill tbhh, what luka said honestly sounds pretty reasoning. Getting rid of lurkers fast seems like a way to speed up this game. Rather than discussing forever
Offline
joey, i think it would be better to take our time and make the right decisions rather than lynch potentially useful people asap
yeah, it's only a day one lynch, so there's gonna be some amount of randomness, but i think if we wait for more info we might make a better decision than just lynching a completely random person because they're "usually inactive"
Offline
Luka504 is giving me bad vibes. He seems overly hung up with Slabdrill. Yet he isn't actually voting for him.
How many posts has he made where he doesn't mention how much he wants to lynch the afk people, specifically Slabdrill?
I think putting some pressure on Luka504 will give us much more valuable information than if we were to mislynch some funposting noobie.
!Lynch Luka504
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
joey, i think it would be better to take our time and make the right decisions rather than lynch potentially useful people asap
yeah, it's only a day one lynch, so there's gonna be some amount of randomness, but i think if we wait for more info we might make a better decision than just lynching a completely random person because they're "usually inactive"
We probably aren't going to get that much more info than what we currently have now. It's honestly hard to get a good answer about someone especially on day 1. Where nobody's really figured anybody out. As usually being inactive will honestly just rise more suspicion towards you.
Offline
joey, i think it would be better to take our time and make the right decisions rather than lynch potentially useful people asap
yeah, it's only a day one lynch, so there's gonna be some amount of randomness, but i think if we wait for more info we might make a better decision than just lynching a completely random person because they're "usually inactive"
Je pensais que tu ne saviez rien de ce jeu, ou du moins c'est ce que tu avez affirmé jusqu'à présent.
D'où vient cette "sagesse"? Peut-être que quelqu'un tu a dit de le dire? Un ami anti-révolutionnaire, hmm?
!Lynch Elle
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
!Lynch Luka504
Offline
I.. Don't know what more you want me to say.
All i want is information. Lynching Slabdrill would give us close to nothing. Examining your behavior however, guarantees hard data. Besides, i really do feel an odd vibe from your posts so far.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
It's honestly hard to get a good answer about someone especially on day 1.
i'm saying i'd like to lynch someone based on at least SOME reasoning, rather than just "they're inactive." right now, lynching slab would basically just be a completely random lynch imo. we're better off waiting and keeping our options open
I thought you did not know anything about this game, or at least that's what you said so far.
Where does this "wisdom" come from? Maybe someone told you to say it? An anti-revolutionary friend, hmm?
i am honored that you think i'm actually saying stuff that is relevant. i watched a few town of salem videos in Preparation for this Big Game. i can assure you that these are my opinions.
Offline
also, i agree with norboy. luka has kinda been overly aggressive and his posts definitely feel "off"
luka, why is slab a better candidate than other lurkers like zelda or crybaby? (they haven't said anything yet either)
Offline
@Ele Alors tu devrais savoir que guillotine les joueurs inactifs quand il n’ya pas de source d’information est la meilleure stratégie.
@Norwegianboy Guillotining Luka nous donnerait autant de détails que guillotining Ele ou tu, non? Quel argument est-ce?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
[ Started around 1732521826.5327 - Generated in 0.100 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.09 MiB) ]