[Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

Kira · 2018-09-04 15:59:10

2B55B5G TNG wrote:

Why? Judges, why? I already told you its a free win for Lictor because I didn't finish my world on time and you still locked my world.

So you're just going to give up because you're against a certain opponent?

Isn't the whole point of this contest to beat people's expectations and show what you can do as a builder?

This is the same as any other contest we've seen before, this time we have 1v1s and not 1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1s.

Would you have given up because you were against certain opponents you thought you never had a chance to beat?

It doesn't matter who and what you are. Anyone has a chance, including you.

Yonanoke, Luka504, PTU, Kaleb, azurepudding

Pingohits · 2018-09-04 16:05:42

Kira wrote:

2B55B5G TNG wrote:
Why? Judges, why? I already told you its a free win for Lictor because I didn't finish my world on time and you still locked my world.
So you're just going to give up because you're against a certain opponent?
Isn't the whole point of this contest to beat people's expectations and show what you can do as a builder?
This is the same as any other contest we've seen before, this time we have 1v1s and not 1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1v1s.
Would you have given up because you were against certain opponents you thought you never had a chance to beat?
It doesn't matter who and what you are. Anyone has a chance, including you.

kira he has no chance stop spreading lies

Kirby · 2018-09-04 17:25:32

2B55B5G TNG wrote:

Why? Judges, why? I already told you its a free win for Lictor because I didn't finish my world on time and you still locked my world.

...because you submitted it

mutantdevle, Trytu, RailMat, Luka504, PTU, Slabdrill, azurepudding, Yonanoke, Onjit, ILikeTofuuJoe, 2b55b5g

ILikeTofuuJoe · 2018-09-05 05:30:13

Dear 2B55B5G TNG, please slap your head twice so your brain can function correctly.

Joeyc · 2018-09-05 06:03:16

Dear ILikeTofuuJoe, please slap your head twice so your brain can function correctly

ILikeTofuuJoe · 2018-09-05 06:18:46

Dear Joeyc, you are not a smiley. You, are an alien species of homo sapiens, which thinks they have control over the smileys, but ended up being controled by the smileys

2b55b5g · 2018-09-05 08:05:58

I did not want to give up. I'm just a bit lazy to build my world, so I didn't finish my world on time.

And did I say I give up and let Lictor win? I only said its a free win for Lictor because I can't finish my world on time.

LukeM

Kaleb · 2018-09-05 17:10:56

2B55B5G TNG wrote:

I did not want to give up. I'm just a bit lazy to build my world, so I didn't finish my world on time.
And did I say I give up and let Lictor win? I only said its a free win for Lictor because I can't finish my world on time.

For “2 French 1 cup”***

Lictor666 · 2018-09-05 23:05:59

Kaleb wrote:

2B55B5G TNG wrote:
I did not want to give up. I'm just a bit lazy to build my world, so I didn't finish my world on time.
And did I say I give up and let Lictor win? I only said its a free win for Lictor because I can't finish my world on time.
For “2 French 1 cup”***

gg team

next round have a great theme
but small world

peace · 2018-09-06 06:45:58

woow i saw LR$ theme and i though hmm nice i have an ide-.. oh medium only

21Twelve

Awesome Algoodo · 2018-09-06 09:02:13

Where is my prize? I lost reached lr round 3 and lost that round. Where is my prize?

2b55b5g · 2018-09-06 11:29:46

I'll try my best to win 'Dragons' >:)

Introduction · 2018-09-06 12:34:43

Awesome Algoodo wrote:

Where is my prize? I lost reached lr round 3 and lost that round. Where is my prize?

think you only get your rewards at the end of the contest

peace · 2018-09-06 14:32:08

ohhh i got an nice idea to build ohh wiat nvm that idea doesnt have much arts hmm l hav eto think about that

peace · 2018-09-06 16:56:31

ok idk if im allowed or if it even gets seen if i do but i have an idea for a world that fits my theme but it requires a 2nd world to see the art (mostly will be placed behind blocks and will hard to be seen so a world portal at end redericting to 2nd world to see the full art) am i allowed to do?

EDIT: oops sorry for double post

Joeyc · 2018-09-06 16:59:07

peace wrote:

ok idk if im allowed or if it even gets seen if i do but i have an idea for a world that fits my theme but it requires a 2nd world to see the art (mostly will be placed behind blocks and will hard to be seen so a world portal at end redericting to 2nd world to see the full art) am i allowed to do?

EDIT: oops sorry for double post

does it say you can, no

Different55 · 2018-09-06 17:04:27

Joeyc wrote:

peace wrote:
ok idk if im allowed or if it even gets seen if i do but i have an idea for a world that fits my theme but it requires a 2nd world to see the art (mostly will be placed behind blocks and will hard to be seen so a world portal at end redericting to 2nd world to see the full art) am i allowed to do?

EDIT: oops sorry for double post
does it say you can, no

The rules are a list of things you can't do, not a list of things you can. He's right to ask.

Kirby · 2018-09-06 17:34:05

peace wrote:

ok idk if im allowed or if it even gets seen if i do but i have an idea for a world that fits my theme but it requires a 2nd world to see the art (mostly will be placed behind blocks and will hard to be seen so a world portal at end redericting to 2nd world to see the full art) am i allowed to do?
EDIT: oops sorry for double post

well of course you cant use multiple worlds, otherwise there wouldn't be a point on restricting world size

Yonanoke

peace · 2018-09-06 20:05:49

Kirby wrote:

peace wrote:
ok idk if im allowed or if it even gets seen if i do but i have an idea for a world that fits my theme but it requires a 2nd world to see the art (mostly will be placed behind blocks and will hard to be seen so a world portal at end redericting to 2nd world to see the full art) am i allowed to do?
EDIT: oops sorry for double post
well of course you cant use multiple worlds, otherwise there wouldn't be a point on restricting world size

well its hard to explain my question wihtout exploitng what im gonna make wait kirby im pming you wiht exact details on what i wanna make so otheres cant steal orso

Joeyc · 2018-09-06 23:59:34

sorry but it's pretty much impossible since all of the losers bracket can't let out their true potential with such a small size along with the themes, don't even get me started. especially if you get picked off in the 1st round. this tournament is a literal **** show sometimes. winners and losers should've had the same sizes, with all of the same deadlines to begin with. I really don't like complaining too much either but this was on my chest since the beginning

Kira · 2018-09-07 00:19:51

Joeyc wrote:

sorry but it's pretty much impossible since all of the losers bracket can't let out their true potential with such a small size along with the themes, don't even get me started. especially if you get picked off in the 1st round. this tournament is a literal **** show sometimes. winners and losers should've had the same sizes, with all of the same deadlines to begin with. I really don't like complaining too much either but this was on my chest since the beginning

hence why you're in the losers bracket because your true potential wasn't enough

azurepudding · 2018-09-07 00:20:57

I still wish this was like a 5 round contest where all teams built for every round, with a point score for each which would be accumulated at the end for total score. Nonsubmitters wouldn't have been able to give free wins either. Not going to say any names, but some worlds I feel.. lacking, to be this far, while some other well made worlds have lost or been eliminated early on. Maybe it could have started with a small world, with each round bumping up the size. Well, something to consider for next contest, maybe?

Tournament style was fun to try out but.. I can only see it becoming more stressful and sour/salty levels will only increase from here on. It becomes about eliminating others rather than winning..

Kira wrote:

Joeyc wrote:
sorry but it's pretty much impossible since all of the losers bracket can't let out their true potential with such a small size along with the themes, don't even get me started. especially if you get picked off in the 1st round. this tournament is a literal **** show sometimes. winners and losers should've had the same sizes, with all of the same deadlines to begin with. I really don't like complaining too much either but this was on my chest since the beginning
hence why you're in the losers bracket because your true potential wasn't enough

There's no need to beat down like this. To be fair and honest, I think Joey's team should have won the first round, as I've been told their opponent purposely made a joke world? And that it was literally "pro vs noob" as a theme, which is actually "good design vs bad design" which the latter shouldn't be in a contest world, honestly. Stairs and hookjumps and such. Joey had a cool Sun and Moon theme with decent art ingame and on minimap, and would have liked to see them continue on through winners.

Kira · 2018-09-07 00:23:24

azurepudding wrote:

I still wish this was like a 5 round contest where all teams built for every round, with a point score for each which would be accumulated at the end for total score. Nonsubmitters wouldn't have been able to give free wins either. Not going to say any names, but some worlds I feel.. lacking, to be this far, while some other well made worlds have lost or been eliminated early on. Maybe it could have started with a small world, with each round bumping up the size. Well, something to consider for next contest, maybe?
Tournament style was fun to try out but.. I can only see it becoming more stressful and sour/salty levels will only increase from here on. It becomes about eliminating others rather than winning..

"It becomes about eliminating others rather than winning"

A
t o u r n a m e n t

basically

Kaleb

azurepudding · 2018-09-07 00:26:12

Kira wrote:

azurepudding wrote:
I still wish this was like a 5 round contest where all teams built for every round, with a point score for each which would be accumulated at the end for total score. Nonsubmitters wouldn't have been able to give free wins either. Not going to say any names, but some worlds I feel.. lacking, to be this far, while some other well made worlds have lost or been eliminated early on. Maybe it could have started with a small world, with each round bumping up the size. Well, something to consider for next contest, maybe?
Tournament style was fun to try out but.. I can only see it becoming more stressful and sour/salty levels will only increase from here on. It becomes about eliminating others rather than winning..

"It becomes about eliminating others rather than winning"

A
t o u r n a m e n t
basically

Yes and my whole point is we shouldn't do tournament style for a contest exactly.

It was something new to try at least but I prefer the past contest styles.

(also edited previous post too late)

Kaleb

Introduction · 2018-09-07 00:42:24

Kira wrote:

Joeyc wrote:
sorry but it's pretty much impossible since all of the losers bracket can't let out their true potential with such a small size along with the themes, don't even get me started. especially if you get picked off in the 1st round. this tournament is a literal **** show sometimes. winners and losers should've had the same sizes, with all of the same deadlines to begin with. I really don't like complaining too much either but this was on my chest since the beginning
hence why you're in the losers bracket because your true potential wasn't enough

weren't the first rounds medium worlds for both brackets though

mutantdevle

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#351 2018-09-04 15:59:10

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#352 2018-09-04 16:05:42

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#353 2018-09-04 17:25:32

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#354 2018-09-05 05:30:13

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#355 2018-09-05 06:03:16, last edited by Joeyc (2018-09-05 06:03:43)

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#356 2018-09-05 06:18:46

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#357 2018-09-05 08:05:58, last edited by 2b55b5g (2018-09-05 08:07:51)

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#358 2018-09-05 17:10:56

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#359 2018-09-05 23:05:59

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#360 2018-09-06 06:45:58

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#361 2018-09-06 09:02:13

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#362 2018-09-06 11:29:46

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#363 2018-09-06 12:34:43

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#364 2018-09-06 14:32:08

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#365 2018-09-06 16:56:31, last edited by peace (2018-09-06 16:56:49)

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#366 2018-09-06 16:59:07, last edited by Joeyc (2018-09-06 16:59:27)

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#367 2018-09-06 17:04:27

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#368 2018-09-06 17:34:05

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#369 2018-09-06 20:05:49

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#370 2018-09-06 23:59:34

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#371 2018-09-07 00:19:51

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#372 2018-09-07 00:20:57, last edited by azurepudding (2018-09-07 00:25:18)

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#373 2018-09-07 00:23:24

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#374 2018-09-07 00:26:12, last edited by azurepudding (2018-09-07 00:26:49)

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

#375 2018-09-07 00:42:24

Re: [Discussion] OFFICIAL Everybody Edits Tournament

Board footer