Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
HeyNK wrote:oh come on this tournament has to be rigged
Are you telling me BOTH my opponents submitted a level BOTH times and that beat my no submission? What are the odds of that even happening??
lel you should submit a world or esle you will lose
also the thems choosen are nice but somewhat hard i spend way too mcuh time thinking tf i wanna make
no more trophy dodge pleeeeeeease
use keys or coins or somethin for that, if you're gonna.
Offline
just under 3 hours left for the losers bracket, make sure you submit the world before the deadline!
Offline
Kirby,
you forgot to say that u are ending it about 3 hours ago
Offline
my world concept just doens't work
when your signature makes about half your comment
Offline
what does sack of gold dec look like 100%
Offline
that image is so large i kind of froze for a second
Offline
that image is so large i kind of froze for a second
WOW
~meow~
Posting Goal: 2000
#Joe Griffin
Thanks HG for the signature and avatar!!!
Offline
Are signs allowed for LR3?
Sup
Offline
no you need to win loser rouund 2 or lose round 2
EDIT nvm i saw theme of LR3 idk
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
It seems that we lost 0:5 to the Dragons team
Does anyone have a link to their last level on Losers bracket?
Have you tried The Everything?
Offline
It seems that we lost 0:5 to the Dragons team
Does anyone have a link to their last level on Losers bracket?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
> Tfw you get mocked by peace...
Offline
... well i wa sjust curious... okay nvm im quitit till end of judging
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
Why do I think the judges are into favouritism
And why did the worst of the community was included in the tournament when it's obvious they'll lose easily
I am Filip and I like women.
Offline
And why did the worst of the community was included in the tournament when it's obvious they'll lose easily
seems pretty self-destructive, because if this were the case, you wouldn't be able to participate
Offline
Why do I think the judges are into favouritism
I really don't know... is it because another team posted here who happened to lose twice? Because half the original entrants have lost twice and have been eliminated at this point. If there's more to your concern, please elaborate.
For this particular team in the screenshots I thought that both highlighted matches were quite close, but in both cases that majority of the judges preferred their opponents' worlds.
And why did the worst of the community was included in the tournament when it's obvious they'll lose easily
Because it is a tournament organized by staff for the entire community and its unfair to lock away part of the community from the start. This allows anyone a chance at doing well in the tournament, not just hand-picked people that staff would think would do well. As a result, we're getting some great worlds from players that I never heard of. Meanwhile, some teams that I'd expect a lot from are producing some somewhat subpar worlds. The low barrier to entry and early appearance of some prizes also allows many teams that may not expect to be competitive (which doesn't mean they won't be) to have some fun and still get some reward.
Offline
Holy **** are you this stupid , i was pointing out that judge's choices are bizzare
In what way? Care to explain at all why you think our choices are bizzare? I may disagree with some judge’s choices personally myself, but i almost always feel they are driven by logical conclusions. As for myself i always try to rate levels by the understandable system i have presented in my first reviews. (Art, Gameplay, creativity/concept and Theme.) It seems to me that you are driven by emotional lust for revenge because of losing rather than valid complaints against the way judges operate.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
I think this has been an interesting contest so far, being a tournament rather than a single entry, BUT.. I did like that multiple winners could be picked in the normal contest style, while only one can win here..
For next contest I think I'd like to see a several round competition, but rather than being pitted up against a single team, the judges grade each level points, say 0 through 50 or so. And whoever has the most points at the end wins. Currently, whether someone wins at 50 to 49, or 10 to 0(a non-submission).. both the losers get the same level of loss while the winners gain the same amount of win, when clearly there's a difference.. in other words you can lose with an amazing world, and can win with a lousy one (like you can literally win if you place just one block if other team doesn't submit)
Just an idea.. I think it could be more fun and less stressful
Offline
Friendly reminder that there are bit under 6 hours remaining for the world building for the Winners Bracket teams.
I haven't finished my world, REEEEEEEE.
Offline
Friendly reminder that there are bit under 6 hours remaining for the world building for the Winners Bracket teams.
I haven't finished my world, REEEEEEEE.
Thank you for this reminder, HG, but I have already finished and submitted my world.
Offline
I still have edit for my world...
but I will respect the rules and won't change anything. I'm just concerned if my PM was seen, as I spent too much time on this for it to not be counted
Offline
I'm resuming making reviews for the next rounds, so those who are still in the tournament after this current round can look forward to feedback on their levels.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Why? Judges, why? I already told you its a free win for Lictor because I didn't finish my world on time and you still locked my world.
she/her
also known as DevilCharlotte
search 2bisniekitastan if you wanna find my worlds on ArchivEE
(i changed my name to that as a meme when ee was about to die, that is not my actual ee name. had i known that an archive would exist i wouldn't have done it. please refer to me as 2b55b5g)
Offline
[ Started around 1738180025.3888 - Generated in 0.141 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.82 MiB (Peak: 2.1 MiB) ]