Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
so there are Q and E shortcuts, that allow you quickly to change single argument blocks (like switches, coin doors, effects and teams) by 1 or -1 (Q or E)
so my idea is to add special button in the corners of double argumented blocks (like portals/world portals) that say witch values you want to change
you can choose one value, or both of them
Then if you press Q, both values cames lower, and when E, both values goes higher
if one of value is equal 0, and you want to lower both of them, only that not equal to 0 change
it could make portals easier to use (of course fast rotating could be great idea)
Thanks to Nikko99 for signature
https: //media.discordapp.net/attachments/402174325349941249/482121641745186816/KHiX2DEFewAAAABJRU5ErkJggg.png
https: //i.imgur.com/YFtzyXA.png
Offline
I need this in my life.
Offline
shortccuts for ticking those boxes coudl be usefull too
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
world portals shouldn't even have the tickbox - the text field should need manual typing
tickbox isn't bad
just need to improve how to choose the world, like list or folder, or something another
it still allows to save some time on loading the world 3 times (go to lobby, go to ID world, go to world where you had wanted to put a portal)
sometimes when you have a lot of used worlds it can take too much more time, so ID has to be gotten manually, but only when you have too many worlds
the ID field affected by Q/E.
yes, i think it should be changed, tickbox is almost impossible to use fastly because you don't know witch world is next, and witch is previous, so think it's good idea
Thanks to Nikko99 for signature
https: //media.discordapp.net/attachments/402174325349941249/482121641745186816/KHiX2DEFewAAAABJRU5ErkJggg.png
https: //i.imgur.com/YFtzyXA.png
Offline
[ Started around 1732213176.0285 - Generated in 0.048 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.47 MiB (Peak: 1.6 MiB) ]