Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2018-08-20 18:00:45

Offensive Ray
Formerly omarabdulhaq
From: Mars
Joined: 2016-03-22
Posts: 768

Reset block

It's meanless since there's /reset now, isn't it?

Offline

#2 2018-08-20 18:03:38

mutantdevle
Moderation Team
From: Hell
Joined: 2015-03-31
Posts: 3,848
Website

Re: Reset block

Not everyone knows they can just do that yet. It's definitely still needed.


kMMA0S6.png dxGW6FY.png

Offline

Wooted by: (4)

#3 2018-08-20 18:05:51, last edited by LukeM (2018-08-20 18:06:48)

LukeM
Member
From: England
Joined: 2016-06-03
Posts: 3,009
Website

Re: Reset block

We had a discussion about this a while ago (not sure if it was just staff or if the community were involved too), but I think the general consensus was that although they technically aren't needed anymore, they can still be used to show visually that you have the option to / have to reset, so they are still useful to have.

Offline

#4 2018-08-20 18:06:04

Offensive Ray
Formerly omarabdulhaq
From: Mars
Joined: 2016-03-22
Posts: 768

Re: Reset block

mutantdevle wrote:

Not everyone knows they can just do that yet. It's definitely still needed.

True, but however players can be informed about it in case they have written /help

Offline

#5 2018-08-21 02:58:43

Freckleface
Member
Joined: 2015-04-02
Posts: 1,364

Re: Reset block

Its more player friendly and looks nicer than a sign that says: "type '/reset' in the chat"


F

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#6 2018-08-21 03:01:23

Xenonetix
Past Owner
From: Moving on with my life
Joined: 2015-03-07
Posts: 899
Website

Re: Reset block

We consider it as more of a guideline to show if you're meant to reset at this point. //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/smile


Xenonetix-2.png

Offline

Wooted by:
Xenonetix1534816883720721

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732215864.6204 - Generated in 0.058 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.43 MiB (Peak: 1.55 MiB) ]