Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Onjit tried to attack peace but failed. peace steals 10 points from Onjit! peace is no longer defending.
The text is Lorem ipsum, a renewed text in typography with the propose of filling blank areas designated to text, and has no other meaning.
I've clearly stated his username and my action to attack him. You, on the other hand, didn't have the pertinence to read the post or you didn't want to take my action. Either of, it's clearly not my fault.
This is probably the 5th time when you deliberately cancel one of my actions during this games.
You did not clearly state your attacking action at all. You hid your action within a wall of text; I don't care for its meaning. I did read the text through Google translate and I read your 'action' in the context of the sentence surrounding it. This led me to conclude it was not clear enough as an action as it was seemingly commenting on an attack on frogman rather than asking to perform one. This is entirely your fault. This is the first time I've 'cancelled one of your actions' in this game. In the previous version of the game, however, I did not count your actions that were deliberate attempts to break the game under the excuse that the rules were not stated clear enough. Not going to lie, it's kinda hypocritical of you to make a big deal out of making the rules so clear last game and then expect me to consider your post as a clear attack on frogman.
Luka504 stole 123 points from peace!
peace stole 64 points from Luka504!
Onjit stole 94 points from peace!
RailMat is defending until post 148!
Mait stole 47 points from peace!
Let's be honest, you put your attack in the middle of a Lorem Ipsum, which is known for being a dummy text, and as such is rarely read.
Imo you basically hid the attack so you could then complain about mutantdevle not finding itThat said, mutantdevle is still partly at fault for allowing commands to be buried in walls of text without him checking them (as opposed to mafia votes for example, where the votes have to be bolded and/or put by themselves on a separate line)
I have no doubt in my mind that Zumza's intention when making that post was to achieve exactly this outcome. He didn't want me to see the attack and purposely hid it. That said, I did see it. However, I read it in the context of the translated sentence rather than isolated words. But personally, I'd say that hiding your action in a paragraph does not constitute clearly stating your action. I also have slight suspicion that had I counted that action as an attack then Zumza would have complained saying it wasn't actually an attack. The very fact that I'd have these suspicions, I think, is further evidence that the action was not stated clearly.
John tried to attack RailMat but failed. RailMat steals 22 points from John! RailMat is no longer defending.
peace stole 90 points from Onjit!
Laka504 stole 58 points from peace!
Mutandevle claims he actually noticed it, and just refused to take my action.
I did not 'refuse' to take your action. I simply discounted it because it did not follow the rule of clearly stating your action. In the previous game, as annoying as you were, your criticisms genuinely helped to improve the quality of the game. Here, you are just trolling. But not in the jokey funny way, in the aggravating intent kind of way. Which is honestly disappointing because I would not expect this from you. I'm at a point where I honestly don't care for it anymore so I'm going to give you a choice:
A) Stop being a ****.
B) Stop posting.
If you continue to try and trip me up, find loopholes in the rules and attempt to exploit them or otherwise attempt to disrupt the game, I will wipe you from the player list and ignore all of your further posts. This effectively bans you from the game. I have no problem with you pointing out flaws in the game or finding loopholes. But as stated in the thread, these issues are to be raised in a PM to me rather than blatantly trying to exploit them in the thread.
RailMat is defending until post 158!
John is defending until post 159!
Offline
pointsssssssss
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
more points
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
MartenM is defending until post 162!
Slabdrill stole 180 points from AlphaJon!
John stole 157 points from Zumza!
peace is defending until post 167!
Luka504 stole 211 points from RailMat!
Offline
yes
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
Just for that smug comment I am going to do just that and hope someone else swoops in and attacks you with your defenses down.
Attack railmat
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
attack railmat
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
[ Started around 1732282001.6284 - Generated in 0.096 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.66 MiB (Peak: 1.89 MiB) ]