Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
1002
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
mutantdevle wrote:xfrogman43 stole 89 points from RailMat!
Onjit tried to attack peace but failed. peace steals 5 points from Onjit!. peace is no longer defending.
John stole 120 points from xfrogman43!
Both me and AlphaJon attacked xfrogman... https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 99#p703699
You may only attack 1 player per post and you must clearly name the specific person you want to attack.
Personally, I'd say that writing a huge paragraph in another language and randomly injecting "attack xfrogman43" into it does not constitute 'clearly naming the specific person you want to attack'. I did Google translate your paragraph when initially seeing your post. The context of the attack was this: "For your free time, when our power of choice to choose the most effective and when you offer any hindrance to that which is well pleasing in his attack xfrogmantular43 are enabled to do the less, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided." Taking into account that the translation is obviously not 100% accurate, I concluded that the sentence was talking about an attack on frogman43. Hence, this post was not considered an attack and defaulted to a comment. If you do want to perform an attack, then in the future clearly state who you are attacking instead of trying to exploit the rules.
peace is defending until post 135!
Offline
Zumza wrote:mutantdevle wrote:xfrogman43 stole 89 points from RailMat!
Onjit tried to attack peace but failed. peace steals 5 points from Onjit!. peace is no longer defending.
John stole 120 points from xfrogman43!
Both me and AlphaJon attacked xfrogman... https://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewt … 99#p703699
mutantdevle wrote:You may only attack 1 player per post and you must clearly name the specific person you want to attack.
Personally, I'd say that writing a huge paragraph in another language and randomly injecting "attack xfrogman43" into it does not constitute 'clearly naming the specific person you want to attack'. I did Google translate your paragraph when initially seeing your post. The context of the attack was this: "For your free time, when our power of choice to choose the most effective and when you offer any hindrance to that which is well pleasing in his attack xfrogmantular43 are enabled to do the less, every pleasure is to be welcomed and every pain avoided." Taking into account that the translation is obviously not 100% accurate, I concluded that the sentence was talking about an attack on frogman43. Hence, this post was not considered an attack and defaulted to a comment. If you do want to perform an attack, then in the future clearly state who you are attacking instead of trying to exploit the rules.
The text is Lorem ipsum, a renewed text in typography with the propose of filling blank areas designated to text, and has no other meaning.
I've clearly stated his username and my action to attack him. You, on the other hand, didn't have the pertinence to read the post or you didn't want to take my action. Either of, it's clearly not my fault.
This is probably the 5th time when you deliberately cancel one of my actions during this games.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
b
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
The text is Lorem ipsum, a renewed text in typography with the propose of filling blank areas designated to text, and has no other meaning.
I've clearly stated his username and my action to attack him. You, on the other hand, didn't have the pertinence to read the post or you didn't want to take my action. Either of, it's clearly not my fault.
This is probably the 5th time when you deliberately cancel one of my actions during this games.
Let's be honest, you put your attack in the middle of a Lorem Ipsum, which is known for being a dummy text, and as such is rarely read.
Imo you basically hid the attack so you could then complain about mutantdevle not finding it
That said, mutantdevle is still partly at fault for allowing commands to be buried in walls of text without him checking them (as opposed to mafia votes for example, where the votes have to be bolded and/or put by themselves on a separate line)
Offline
Zumza wrote:The text is Lorem ipsum, a renewed text in typography with the propose of filling blank areas designated to text, and has no other meaning.
I've clearly stated his username and my action to attack him. You, on the other hand, didn't have the pertinence to read the post or you didn't want to take my action. Either of, it's clearly not my fault.
This is probably the 5th time when you deliberately cancel one of my actions during this games.
Let's be honest, you put your attack in the middle of a Lorem Ipsum, which is known for being a dummy text, and as such is rarely read.
Imo you basically hid the attack so you could then complain about mutantdevle not finding itThat said, mutantdevle is still partly at fault for allowing commands to be buried in walls of text without him checking them (as opposed to mafia votes for example, where the votes have to be bolded and/or put by themselves on a separate line)
Mutandevle claims he actually noticed it, and just refused to take my action.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
[ Started around 1732281739.5834 - Generated in 0.104 seconds, 16 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.75 MiB (Peak: 2.01 MiB) ]