Official Everybody Edits Forums

John

Member

Joined: 2019-01-11

Posts: 2,011

Re: Count. to 1000!

Defend

---

Miss Everybody Edits? Check out PixelWalker.net!

[imghttps://mm.sirjosh3917.com/PW?scale=1img]

RailMat

Formerly MatthijsFidder

From: Emmen (NL)

Joined: 2017-05-22

Posts: 1,534

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack thanksl0l

---

thanks AnatolyEE, lrussell, AnatolyEE, HG.

Guest.

Guest

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack onjit

Slabdrill

Formerly 12345678908642

From: canada

Joined: 2015-08-15

Posts: 3,402

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

This is a comment.

note to self: next time a reply to a post is required, ping everyone in this game on discord to post so that i can post my comment.

---

suddenly random sig change

Luka504

Member

From: Serbia,probs never heard of it

Joined: 2015-02-19

Posts: 2,934

Re: Count. to 1000!

I agree with Zumza on the fact that you shouldn't just change your rules all willy-nilly like that Devlin.
You badly worded the rules and that made Zumza believe he could do something that he cannot do, and it took you a while to respond to what he is saying. You should probably restart the game and make sure that you make consistent and properly worded rules.

---

How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.

John

Member

Joined: 2019-01-11

Posts: 2,011

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack onjit

---

Miss Everybody Edits? Check out PixelWalker.net!

[imghttps://mm.sirjosh3917.com/PW?scale=1img]

Zumza

Member

From: root

Joined: 2015-02-17

Posts: 4,656

Re: Count. to 1000!

also perhaps disable edit.

---

Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

RailMat

Formerly MatthijsFidder

From: Emmen (NL)

Joined: 2017-05-22

Posts: 1,534

Re: Count. to 1000!

defend

---

thanks AnatolyEE, lrussell, AnatolyEE, HG.

Onjit

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,709

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

defend

---

:.|:;

Guest.

Guest

Re: Count. to 1000!

also perhaps disable edit.

how

Joeyc

Guest

Re: Count. to 1000!

steal everything luka owns

Slabdrill

Formerly 12345678908642

From: canada

Joined: 2015-08-15

Posts: 3,402

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack john

---

suddenly random sig change

thanksL0L

Member

From: I LIED AGAIN IM NOT FROM ASIA

Joined: 2017-12-09

Posts: 394

Re: Count. to 1000!

defend

---

Its time to tell the truth again

Joeyc

Guest

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack thankslol

Nice edit thankslol, kek

attack slabdrill

Onjit

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,709

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack slabdrill

---

:.|:;

Zumza

Member

From: root

Joined: 2015-02-17

Posts: 4,656

Re: Count. to 1000!

also perhaps disable edit.

how

It's in the options the OP has
Some of the features are forum category specific.

---

Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Count. to 1000!

where is mutandevle?

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

Zumza

Member

From: root

Joined: 2015-02-17

Posts: 4,656

Re: Count. to 1000!

He probably got stabbed with a wooden stake.

---

Everybody edits, but some edit more than others

mutantdevle

Moderation Team

From: Hell

Joined: 2015-03-31

Posts: 3,848

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

Players currently in defence mode will now be marked in bold on the leaderboard.

Onjit cannot be attacked until post 133!

I reprove this.
The rules weren't clear enough. (as previous said not only by me) And my actions were made according to them. Applying rules retroactively is abusing.
I demand a recount or 0 points.

The rules were clear enough, you just tried to abuse the wording. Every other player was able to understand the rules and those who still violated them were given the same treatment as you. The only retroactive rules I have applied are a small change to the counting system for game balance purposes and the addition of a loss of points for violating rules. The addition of the rule about attacking someone who is defending costing you points would have had no impact on the game since no one has done this yet. Also, for the record, the penalty for violating the rules has not been imposed on anyone who broke the rules before this rule was added. So I guess you can think of it as a grace period of no penalty for breaking the rules to make sure there is no doubt about them. Your demands will not be met. There will be no recount and I'm giving you 62 points instead of 0 because that's how many points your post is worth.

John cannot be attacked until post 136!

RailMat stole 89 points from thanksLOL!

Jet tried to attack Onjit but failed. Onjit steals 16 points from Jet!

I agree with Zumza on the fact that you shouldn't just change your rules all willy-nilly like that Devlin.
You badly worded the rules and that made Zumza believe he could do something that he cannot do, and it took you a while to respond to what he is saying. You should probably restart the game and make sure that you make consistent and properly worded rules.

▼For anyone who cares about Zumza:

The only rules I have changed have done the following things for the game:

1. Made the game more balanced. 1 point per post number was drastically OP.
2. Given more of a punishment for breaking rules other than simply discounting a post.
3. Made the game slightly more interesting but wouldn't have had an impact on the game anyway since no one had attacked someone who was defending before the rule was added.

I hardly think that needs the game to be restarted.

The rules weren't that badly worded either. They were perfectly understood by everyone except 2 people. The first person got the message as soon as I told them their 2nd post didn't count. Unfortunately, I wasn't around when Zumza was breaking the rule.

However, Zumza was told by multiple people that what he was doing wouldn't be counted yet he ignored them. In theory, he should conclude that maybe all those people were telling the truth considering, as was pointed out to him by you, that the way he was interpreting the rule would be heavily abusable.

He understood that the wording of the rules had slight leeway for interpretation, but instead of playing it safe, he continued doing what multiple told him he couldn't do as a gamble for getting as many points as possible. That gamble did not pay off.

I'm not going to restart the game unless there is mass support for it. But I hardly feel like I need to when it really isn't that hard for Zumza to catch back up.

John tried to attack Onjit but failed. Onjit steals 29 points from John!

also perhaps disable edit.

Good call.

RailMat cannot be attacked until post 143!

Onjit cannot be attacked until post 144!

JoeyC stole 49 points from Luka504!

Slabdrill stole 130 points from John!

defend

Due to this post being edited, it will count as a simple comment.

JoeyC stole 79 points from thanksLOL!

Onjit stole 157 points from Slabdrill!

where is mutandevle?

Sometimes I sleep and live a life.

He probably got stabbed with a wooden stake.

You cannot post twice within the last 5 posts: Zumza loses 26 points!

---

Onjit

Member

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 9,709

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

defend

---

:.|:;

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: Count. to 1000!

actack mutansdevle

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

Slabdrill

Formerly 12345678908642

From: canada

Joined: 2015-08-15

Posts: 3,402

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack railmat

---

suddenly random sig change

Guest.

Guest

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack onjit

MartenM

Member

From: The Netherlands

Joined: 2016-03-31

Posts: 978

Website

Re: Count. to 1000!

Dig dig digeridooo
I am digging for the gooo
Dig dig digeridoo
Gimme those point

---

Ingame: marten22        My steam: MartenM

RailMat

Formerly MatthijsFidder

From: Emmen (NL)

Joined: 2017-05-22

Posts: 1,534

Re: Count. to 1000!

attack slabdrill

---

thanks AnatolyEE, lrussell, AnatolyEE, HG.