Official Everybody Edits Forums
Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#576 2018-02-25 21:00:19
- RailMat
- Formerly MatthijsFidder
- From: Emmen (NL)
- Joined: 2017-05-22
- Posts: 1,534
Offline
#577 2018-02-25 21:03:24
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Different55 wrote:Guess I'm back now. Kinda nice having those two as admins though so I guess they can stay.
are you gonna to add new forum mods?
Probably not. The current forum staff as a whole has just become *more* capable of handling any problems that come up, not less. And the place hasn't grown enough to the point where we need more forum staff to come on board.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#578 2018-02-25 22:31:14
- TaskManager
- Formerly maxi123
- From: i really should update this
- Joined: 2015-03-01
- Posts: 9,468
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Guess I'm back now. Kinda nice having those two as admins though so I guess they can stay.
and so, the second step of the plan on overthrowing our dictator has been completed
*hummerz's evil laughter in the background*
Offline
#579 2018-02-26 06:41:37
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Shuffled around forum groups yet again. This time structured as they ideally should be, around forum permissions. There's now only 2 groups for EE Staff instead of 4.
The first is named EE Staff. It's for EE Staff. Everyone in here has custom colors and custom titles according to their team name and in-game name color.
The second is a hidden group that's basically identical to EE Staff, except it has the ability to manage topics in the Game Business section. Both John (Emalton) and Xenonetix (Mega Lamb) are part of this group now, and its permissions have been tightened down to prevent access to any parts of the forums that they don't need access to.
The new per-user custom colors are also per-theme. You can set different colors for light and dark themes so we don't have to try and pick colors that work on both types of themes at once.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
- Wooted by: (5)
#580 2018-02-26 06:55:15, last edited by Anatoly (2018-02-26 06:56:18)
- Anatoly
- Guest
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Didn’t John had another name, too?
#581 2018-02-26 07:16:30
- Zoey2070
- Moderation Team
- From: Shakuras
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 5,512
Re: Update Discussion for forums
give me privs to edit ALL POSTS for........ WIKI PURPOSES [?]
or just like. whatever random ee guides float around
altho i guess i could just ask someone else to do it
so
nevermind
good work diff
proc's discorb 
stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂ ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe 
[this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
? 
Offline
#582 2018-02-26 09:32:49
- Xfrogman43
- Member
- From: need to find a new home
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 4,174
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Didn’t John had another name, too?
emalton changed his name to john. what are you talking about
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
- Wooted by:
#583 2018-02-26 14:13:07
- Anatoly
- Guest
Re: Update Discussion for forums
AnatolyEE wrote:Didn’t John had another name, too?
emalton changed his name to john. what are you talking about
What was his name between John and Emalton? Or I might mean somebody else, idk
#584 2018-02-26 16:21:21
- Kira
- Guest
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Xfrogman43 wrote:AnatolyEE wrote:Didn’t John had another name, too?
emalton changed his name to john. what are you talking about
What was his name between John and Emalton? Or I might mean somebody else, idk
between John and Emalton there's "and"
hope i was of help
- Wooted by:
#585 2018-02-26 19:49:52
- Xfrogman43
- Member
- From: need to find a new home
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 4,174
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Xfrogman43 wrote:AnatolyEE wrote:Didn’t John had another name, too?
emalton changed his name to john. what are you talking about
What was his name between John and Emalton? Or I might mean somebody else, idk
you are thinking of something else
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
- Wooted by:
#586 2018-03-26 23:28:56
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
fixed a bug where guest users sharing a name with an existing user would steal that user's username colors in the forum view.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#587 2018-03-28 17:44:45
- Schlog
- Banned
- Joined: 2015-07-21
- Posts: 1,960
Re: Update Discussion for forums
fix the bug where theres no forum mods
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
#588 2018-03-29 21:10:14
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Fixed bug where warnings issued from the profile didn't show up on the recent warnings page.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#589 2018-04-03 00:32:30
- Tomahawk
- Forum Mod
- From: UK
- Joined: 2015-02-18
- Posts: 2,863
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Hey Diff, what's the longest period of peace the forums have had, during which no warnings have been issued?
Jawapa screwed us but maybe we can try for a new record.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
#590 2018-04-03 00:42:09
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Hey Diff, what's the longest period of peace the forums have had, during which no warnings have been issued?
Jawapa screwed us but maybe we can try for a new record.
and I screwed you over by flagging him! aha!
Offline
#591 2018-04-03 01:38:21
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
Mar 31 2015 -> Apr 9 2015 8 days passed without a warning.
+---------------------+---------------------+------------+
| date_one | date_two | days |
+---------------------+---------------------+------------+
| 2015-03-31 23:12:24 | 2015-04-09 14:49:14 | 8.65057870 |
| 2018-02-06 10:27:12 | 2018-02-13 20:45:23 | 7.42929398 |
| 2018-01-30 15:14:31 | 2018-02-05 11:11:56 | 5.83153935 |
| 2018-02-27 15:31:34 | 2018-03-05 10:29:34 | 5.79027778 |
| 2016-09-02 08:35:24 | 2016-09-07 05:42:45 | 4.88010417 |
+---------------------+---------------------+------------+
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
- Wooted by: (5)
#592 2018-05-17 02:32:21
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
The little "BBcode: on [img ]: on [url ]: on" status bar has been replaced with a single "These forums use BBCode" message with a link to the community guide instead of the built-in help page.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#593 2018-07-05 16:14:09, last edited by pncordik (2018-07-05 16:15:58)
- pncordik
- Member
- From: I'm a beggar so I don't live
- Joined: 2018-06-23
- Posts: 183
Re: Update Discussion for forums
nervous smiley
would be >:( ,but transformed in a smiley, like 
, 
, 
, 
, 
, 
, 
, 
and 
Offline
#594 2018-07-05 16:15:18
- Kira
- Guest
Re: Update Discussion for forums
nervous smiley
would be >:(
Indeed, we can't really ignore the fact nervous smiley should be >:(
Again, you have proven to be on top of the social ladder. Props to you my man.
- Wooted by:
#595 2018-07-05 23:34:59
- Guest.
- Guest
Re: Update Discussion for forums
nervous smiley
would be >:( ,but transformed in a smiley, like,
,
,
,
,
,
and
this isnt a suggestion thread. only smileys here are from https://wiki.everybodyedits.com/List_of_Smileys
#596 2018-09-18 01:52:30, last edited by Different55 (2018-09-18 01:55:34)
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
YouTube embeds are now image links until clicked, at which point they turn into full videos. This should eliminate lag on video-heavy pages.
Also they obey the "Show images in posts" option in the profile and fall back to imageless links in that case and don't transform.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
- Wooted by: (7)
#597 2018-09-18 02:49:31
- Pingohits
- Banned
- From: aids lizard
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 7,591
Re: Update Discussion for forums
nice musci
Offline
#598 2018-09-20 20:45:43
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
trigger warnings are now content warnings. the old tags will continue to work but the new tag is [CW ] for Content Warning. The inline tag remains [TW ] and I'm just gonna say it stands for Tiny Warning now.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
#599 2018-09-20 21:03:52, last edited by TaskManager (2018-09-20 21:04:57)
- TaskManager
- Formerly maxi123
- From: i really should update this
- Joined: 2015-03-01
- Posts: 9,468
Re: Update Discussion for forums
trigger warnings are now content warnings. the old tags will continue to work but the new tag is [CW ] for Content Warning. The inline tag remains [TW ] and I'm just gonna say it stands for Tiny Warning now.
maybe rename the button in quick reply box to "CONTENT WARNING"? it might be not obvious to people what does "CW" mean
edit: alright what the **** it does NOT work
what the DOUBLE **** i tried to post it with CW tags and it changed them to cw and they DONT wWORK whELP
Offline
#600 2018-09-20 21:55:56
- Different55
- Forum Admin
- Joined: 2015-02-07
- Posts: 16,577
Re: Update Discussion for forums
They don't work because you disabled them in your profile.
Which reminds me I need to rename them in the profile setting.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
- Wooted by:
[ Started around 1747004508.3545 - Generated in 0.170 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.18 MiB) ]