Official Everybody Edits Forums

Xfrogman43

Member

From: need to find a new home

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 4,174

CONFIRMATION

things that need confirmation
1) exiting a level before saving (if the world hasnt changed in any way)
2) joining a new campaign when you already have progress in one

will add to list if people suggest more

---

thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar

peace

Member

From: admin land

Joined: 2015-08-10

Posts: 9,226

Re: CONFIRMATION

things that need confirmation
1) exiting a level before saving (if the world hasnt changed in any way)
2) joining a new campaign when you already have progress in one

will add to list if people suggest more

1) yes
2) yes
1) OFC ADD NOBODY WANTS TO LOSE PROGRESS IN THEIR WORLD
2) *plays exrtreme campaing* *1 week later* omg finlay the last mini ill com eback later here to do it *goes ot lobby and joins friend who is in a campaing* *loses progress* *cries a lot* *breaks stuff in house*

---

thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell

Tomahawk

Forum Mod

From: UK

Joined: 2015-02-18

Posts: 2,863

Re: CONFIRMATION

First one needs a checkbox in profile settings that defaults to On.

---

One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.

mrjawapa

Corn Man 🌽

From: Ohio, USA

Joined: 2015-02-15

Posts: 5,840

Website

Re: CONFIRMATION

) joining a new campaign when you already have progress in one

Or allow more than one worlds progress to be saves

---

Discord: jawp#5123

Latif

Member

From: The Netherlands

Joined: 2015-03-13

Posts: 1,206

Re: CONFIRMATION

) joining a new campaign when you already have progress in one

Or allow more than one worlds progress to be saves

It would require more space in the server, but this actually makes more sense.

LukeM

Member

From: England

Joined: 2016-06-03

Posts: 3,009

Website

Re: CONFIRMATION

) joining a new campaign when you already have progress in one

Or allow more than one worlds progress to be saves

It would require more space in the server, but this actually makes more sense.

I guess most of the space is probably taken up by switches, I'm assuming the values of each of the 1000 switches has to be stored, which (as they probably havent packed the bits) is a kilobyte or so plus some overhead. This probably means around 100 worlds could be stored without taking up too much space, assuming you havent mass liked / favourited worlds. If this is still a problem, I guess they could probably compact this by either packing the bits (meaning it would take 1/8 of the space), or storing only activated switches (as usually very few are used)