Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
[tag]Different55[/tag] should see this.
@Different55 should see this.
[tag]Tomahawk[/tag]
@Tomahawk
And then the person tagged gets some kinda notification that links them to this post.
~ One name per tag.
~ The colour of the tagged name corresponds to the forum legend.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
it's good
but
whirl, anatoly, peace
you know what i am talking about
Offline
[tag]Different55[/tag] should see this.
@Different55 should see this.
[tag]Tomahawk[/tag]
@Tomahawk
And then the person tagged gets some kinda notification that links them to this post.
~ One name per tag.
~ The colour of the tagged name corresponds to the forum legend.
YES YES YES YES YES!!!!! NEED!!! NEED!!!
thanks hg for making this much better and ty for my avatar aswell
Offline
What about using the user's respective ID instead of name? Could prevent issues with name changes.
Offline
it's good
but
whirl, anatoly, peaceyou know what i am talking about
The 'spam' warning seems to work fairly well.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
Gosha wrote:it's good
but
whirl, anatoly, peaceyou know what i am talking about
The 'spam' warning seems to work fairly well.
Well, I would like to have few people blacklisted to mention me
Offline
What about using the user's respective ID instead of name? Could prevent issues with name changes.
This is a good idea, but maybe when you tag someone the forums internally replaces it with the ID so you don't have to type it?
Miss Everybody Edits? Check out PixelWalker.net!
[imghttps://mm.sirjosh3917.com/PW?scale=1img]
Offline
it's good
but
whirl, anatoly, peaceyou know what i am talking about
May you please **** off? Only because the person is bad doesn’t mean he is bad. Only because you consider “yourself as cool”, doesn’t mean either that you’re cool. So please ^ 3 names, 3 tags. It’s you who will abuse it.
Only because the person is bad doesn’t mean he is bad.
:thinking:
Whatever, I don't want to get mentioned by you, not because "I am cool", but because you usually don't add anything to the discussion
Offline
AnatolyEE wrote:Only because the person is bad doesn’t mean he is bad.
:thinking:
Whatever, I don't want to get mentioned by you, not because "I am cool", but because you usually don't add anything to the discussion
Who said I’ll use it?
it's good
but
whirl, anatoly, peaceyou know what i am talking about
actually its good idea but add everyone and here mentions so only forum staff can do it
Gosha wrote:it's good
but
whirl, anatoly, peaceyou know what i am talking about
The 'spam' warning seems to work fairly well.
can you not
In Vanilla forums you have this mention feature. But it's a replacement of the quoting feature (you can still copy paste people's posts but nobody does that). In my opinion, mentioning is better because it takes less space. but using both features in one forum is a bit redundant. Then we would have to choose if we either quote or mention.
In Vanilla forums you also get a notification when someone mentions you like you requested. Why can't Diff just make it so you get a notification when someone quoted your post? (quote in a quote doesn't count)
Offline
@Onjit hi
Offline
Abusing it will result in a warning of course
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1732957529.2577 - Generated in 0.070 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.71 MiB (Peak: 1.94 MiB) ]