Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
As long as it's cracked I'll join. Not going to pay for such a crappy game again.
Minecraft is cheaper than most, yet it's one of the very first if not the first to offer an infinitely-sized world to explore. So, basically, it's an endless world at a fraction of the cost of most big video games. It also has many custom mods, maps, resource packs, and servers to change things up to how you want it. It's a phenomenon, causing countless YouTube series and videos based off of it. To Microsoft, at least, it's worth at least $2,500,000,000 in USD. Yet, you still call it a crappy game? And you ask us to perform illegal tasks for you so you can play it just for your personal whim? I'm curious—what's your definition of a non-crappy game?
Offline
what's your definition of a non-crappy game?
A game with a good development and support team that can handle migrations without losing accounts (a.k.a. mine).
Offline
N1KF wrote:what's your definition of a non-crappy game?
A game with a good development and support team that can handle migrations without losing accounts (a.k.a. mine).
...oh. That's understandable. If you haven't read this I recommend you do (assuming that's the migration you're referring to).
Still, it doesn't stop how self-entitled asking for an illegal server looks.
Offline
As long as it's cracked I'll join. Not going to pay for such a crappy game again.
oh look it's this again
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
I think I am able to host a server. Do we want old combat mechanics or the newer combat system?
I think we can use 1.12 or a newer version.
Support is necessary, we also could just set up a vanilla server, hope that everyone follows the rules or some time of admin team.
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
Offline
I think we can use 1.12 or a newer version.
Support is necessary, we also could just set up a vanilla server, hope that everyone follows the rules or some time of admin team.
I plan on using 1.12.*, but I can still enable old combat if people would like.
If people are really against 1.12 I can try to set up a protocol hack that accepts older clients maybe.
Offline
Pehpe wrote:I think we can use 1.12 or a newer version.
Support is necessary, we also could just set up a vanilla server, hope that everyone follows the rules or some time of admin team.
I plan on using 1.12.*, but I can still enable old combat if people would like.
If people are really against 1.12 I can try to set up a protocol hack that accepts older clients maybe.
Seems legit.
My discord is corrupted currently so can you inform me of a rough time you can get it setup?
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
I think I am able to host a server. Do we want old combat mechanics or the newer combat system?
new version with an old combat mechanics plugin would be GOOD
Offline
Emalton wrote:I think I am able to host a server. Do we want old combat mechanics or the newer combat system?
new version with an old combat mechanics plugin would be GOOD
Why would you prefer old combat mechanics?
Offline
Kirby wrote:Emalton wrote:I think I am able to host a server. Do we want old combat mechanics or the newer combat system?
new version with an old combat mechanics plugin would be GOOD
Why would you prefer old combat mechanics?
new ones are stupid
Offline
N1KF wrote:Kirby wrote:Emalton wrote:I think I am able to host a server. Do we want old combat mechanics or the newer combat system?
new version with an old combat mechanics plugin would be GOOD
Why would you prefer old combat mechanics?
new ones are stupid
New ones are more reliable.
Woot Kirby's post if you want old,
woot mine if you want 1.8+
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
Kirby wrote:N1KF wrote:Kirby wrote:Emalton wrote:I think I am able to host a server. Do we want old combat mechanics or the newer combat system?
new version with an old combat mechanics plugin would be GOOD
Why would you prefer old combat mechanics?
new ones are stupid
New ones are more reliable.
Woot Kirby's post if you want old,
woot mine if you want 1.8+
a stone axe does more attack damage than a diamond sword
a diamond axe does as much attack damage as a stone one
it's virtually impossible to combat more than 1 person, as now you basically have to trade hits every time, so if you fight someone evenly matched you don't really have a chance to get out with more than a heart or two (unless you use bows but bows are dumb)
Offline
Pehpe wrote:Kirby wrote:new ones are stupid
New ones are more reliable.
Woot Kirby's post if you want old,
woot mine if you want 1.8+a stone axe does more attack damage than a diamond sword
a diamond axe does as much attack damage as a stone oneit's virtually impossible to combat more than 1 person, as now you basically have to trade hits every time, so if you fight someone evenly matched you don't really have a chance to get out with more than a heart or two (unless you use bows but bows are dumb)
A stone axe is slower than a diamond sword
A diamond axe is faster than a stone one
suddenly random sig change
Offline
Pehpe wrote:Kirby wrote:N1KF wrote:Kirby wrote:new version with an old combat mechanics plugin would be GOOD
Why would you prefer old combat mechanics?
new ones are stupid
New ones are more reliable.
Woot Kirby's post if you want old,
woot mine if you want 1.8+a stone axe does more attack damage than a diamond sword
a diamond axe does as much attack damage as a stone oneit's virtually impossible to combat more than 1 person, as now you basically have to trade hits every time, so if you fight someone evenly matched you don't really have a chance to get out with more than a heart or two (unless you use bows but bows are dumb)
c o n t e x t buddy.
A stone axe is slow, for chopping wood.
A diamond axe is fast, for (still) chopping wood.
Lets put it this way, if you take a stone axe to the head or a diamond axe to the head, you die anyway.
welcome to minecraft
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
shut up idiot
idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot idot
Offline
shut up idiot
shut up idiot
Just stating that context is very important in all situations in life and can be applied anywhere.
A Very important concept, especially relating to Minecraft. Maybe you could use some?
many things happen over a dramatic course of action
Offline
Woot this post if you want new combat
Offline
Woot this post if you want old combat
Offline
someone tell me the difference between the combat, i am confusion
proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂ ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?
Offline
someone tell me the difference between the combat, i am confusion
Old: Waiting does not affect how strong your attacks are, encouraging players to click as soon as possible to deal the most damage.
New: Waiting a small amount of time between attacks is rewarded with more damage dealt, creating a slower more strategic fighting system.
Offline
Zoey2070 wrote:someone tell me the difference between the combat, i am confusion
Old: Waiting does not affect how strong your attacks are, encouraging players to click as soon as possible to deal the most damage.
New: Waiting a small amount of time between attacks is rewarded with more damage dealt, creating a slower more strategic fighting system.
oh. is that what that bar thing is? when are you supposed to attack in regards to that
note that this is a serious question, i really dunno bc i only play mc sporadically
proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂ ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?
Offline
N1KF wrote:Zoey2070 wrote:someone tell me the difference between the combat, i am confusion
Old: Waiting does not affect how strong your attacks are, encouraging players to click as soon as possible to deal the most damage.
New: Waiting a small amount of time between attacks is rewarded with more damage dealt, creating a slower more strategic fighting system.oh. is that what that bar thing is? when are you supposed to attack in regards to that
note that this is a serious question, i really dunno bc i only play mc sporadically
when it fills up you swing
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
you can't combo people in 1.12 and pvp is essentially ruined if you can't combo
Offline
[ Started around 1732489455.4524 - Generated in 0.100 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.17 MiB) ]