Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
So I was right by believing N1KF and Devlin are on the same team, but I couldn't see they're the mafia.
I think you guys deserve the prize for the best mafia team, honestly.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
So I was right by believing N1KF and Devlin are on the same team, but I couldn't see they're the mafia.
I think you guys deserve the prize for the best mafia team, honestly.
I don't know if you read the scum chat but we did have an elaborate plan that had the ultimate goal of having one of us seize control of the town as the seer. It would have been such an amazing tactic if we pulled it off and didn't get mod killed :3 But since hummerz was the seer that probably would have created some problems with the plan not to mention we would have probably shot him regardless of whether I had to stop playing or not since we didn't actually think he was the seer.
Offline
▼Hidden text
Due to the way my rolecard was worded, I spent the entire game thinking that my heal potion was to revive a dead player, rather than act as a 1-use doctor heal as it was intended. I was only corrected after trying to revive Onjit and asking questions. I was only told that humz was killed "tonight" (which at the time was the night before) so I couldn't revive him.
Just wanted to add 1 more complaint to the jar.
Currently playing through: Mega Man 1-6
Listen to my in-game music! (it's pretty much all I'm good at)
Offline
MatthijsFidder wrote:▼Hidden textDue to the way my rolecard was worded, I spent the entire game thinking that my heal potion was to revive a dead player, rather than act as a 1-use doctor heal as it was intended. I was only corrected after trying to revive Onjit and asking questions. I was only told that humz was killed "tonight" (which at the time was the night before) so I couldn't revive him.
Just wanted to add 1 more complaint to the jar.
Tbh any normal host would have corrected you via PM when you mentioned being a retributionist in the thread.
Offline
Personally, I don't consider it a win for scum. It was too easy for us to win as HeyNK pointed out in the dead chat.
Offline
I don't really blame Onjit for gamethrowing
But if he didn't, town would have secured the win. It'd be HeyNK and I remaining, and I went along with his evidence (that wasn't real, btw. humz never inspected HeyNK) that confirmed him town. So N1KF would have been lynched or shot by Onjit.
I was always wary of that evidence, which is another reason I wanted humz revived. But since I couldn't prove it right or wrong I felt I had to go with it and pray.
Currently playing through: Mega Man 1-6
Listen to my in-game music! (it's pretty much all I'm good at)
Offline
guys let's clear something up. I never investigated heynk so I guess that's my fault for forgetting that a dead seer might be misread there.
but if I don't give a "scum read" on everyone, but vote literally twice the whole day... shouldn't that be some sort of signal? Either y'all weren't reading or I'm wrong for assuming votes should be considered.
and yeah I feel like if the maf pulled their stunt, I'd've been out of luck until they killed me. That probably would've been the stretch I guess.
I wouldn't call it a win for scum given that the hunter knew better lol.
Offline
lol also devlin/n1kf I really wanted to push your apparent 1v1 because I knew you and other maf would go along with the lynch and that'd just make life easier... but I couldn't literally say "lol hey guys they're bussing so let's help them out"... and no one really took the bait
Offline
Imo that signal was too subtle. Voting twice could just mean your mind hasn't been changed.
The reason I thought you were anything but the seer is that if the seer dies, the rest of town should still have the seer's scumreads to go off of. And posting your scumreads doesn't really mean you're a PR, since VTs do it rather frequently as well
I mean I also knew you weren't the hunter because Onjit claimed that and I was the witch but anywho
And yes votes matter. I personally though, take them much more into consideration AFTER somebody gets lynched. Who started the wagon? Who was in the middle of it? Did anybody hammer? Did anybody try to divert attention from this lynch who is now known to be scum? Who didn't vote at all, or voted someone else entirely? Before the lynch I consider votes a loose indication of a user's scumreads, which VTs and scum also do.
Currently playing through: Mega Man 1-6
Listen to my in-game music! (it's pretty much all I'm good at)
Offline
I personally though, take them much more into consideration AFTER somebody gets lynched.
I entirely agree. I didn't want my reads/vote to be taken with any sort of intensity because that'd bring me closer to the mafia, which I ended up doing anyway. But at that point and by your definition the vote should've been a clear beacon
Offline
well my complaining aside, I guess I'll just remember to post some reads next time
regardless of reads or votes, I think it difficult to toe the line between actual true results and the fake ones to cover the fact that the seer doesn't want to get night killed d1
so eh
Offline
Well regardless of what I think I might not be right. It's not like I or anyone else has the ultimate strategy that secures them the win every game. There could be reasons to not post reads that I didn't think of.
But yeah I should have looked harder into your votes after you died
Currently playing through: Mega Man 1-6
Listen to my in-game music! (it's pretty much all I'm good at)
Offline
[ Started around 1732475571.3886 - Generated in 0.477 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.6 MiB (Peak: 1.81 MiB) ]