Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Different55 wrote:fine geez here take your page
Ah, democracy. When one player raging in allcaps can trigger a change.
If only there were a rational way to have made that decision. Like some arcane system where each member could somehow indicate his or her support for - or opposition to - this feature, thereby producing a final representative tally by which an appropriate judgement could be made.
If only...
Like a bunch of people wooting his post showing support and literally nobody besides me quoting forumers long since gone saying anything against it?
I guess we can only dream
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Regardless, I'm arguing the principle. Wooting shows support and is quick to do, while disagreeing would require a post. The two methods of voting are not identical and so the method of voting - and hence the subsequent judgement - may be biased.
It's also nice to be a little more public about features like this. A simple strawpoll link in that Forum Business thread would have sufficed.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
I guess I should've been somewhat reductive..
Offline
Why was EELagsToday banned?
Offline
I see no reason in hiding the details, all it does is say which post warranted the ban
10 years and still awkward. Keep it up, baby!
Offline
Offline
Offline
Let's just lock this. There is no point.
or we could keep it open to discussion because that's never a bad thing
Offline
[ Started around 1738360622.9742 - Generated in 0.073 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.52 MiB (Peak: 1.68 MiB) ]