Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
@Diff I haven't done jack **** this game. Why would scum need to kill me?
If 2 cops weren't dead already I'd say "you could be a cop who's laying low while you gather info." I guess you don't need to be a cop to gather info but hey. In any case, they'd lynch you for the same exact reason you threw at someone else:
Proc is a player I'd expect scum to want to lynch with the chance if he were Town instead of Kira.
You're a good player, so if you aren't scum then why hasn't scum taken care of you yet?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Offline
Processor wrote:Hm, I don't like that slip. Hummerz is either a PR or Scum at this point.
We've seen already 2 PR role-cards that include the legacy system. If we don't find anything better I think thats our best odds.
Possibly significant: the only two roles we've seen with that have both been cops.
Proc, you allegedly have (had?) a PR. Can you legacy?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Can you legacy?
Can I what?
---
Hummerz town.
---
I'm open to lynching Zumza. Or as a #2 favorite choice: Rhaz. (I cannot tell if he is town or scum)
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
Bimps and JaWapa seem okay lynches too, idk. They've been banned for a while so I cannot tell how they would have reacted if they weren't banned.
Band wagoning more like banned wagoning.
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
Offline
the wagons, the votes, everything. I cannot decide how people are. based on nothing.
Ill put this for now. Rhazh didn't use his chances to jump on wagons, but I don't see that as proof of his innocence.
!vote Rhazh
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
Can I what?
Can you this
At any time, you can choose a player to give this role in the event that you die by using the command !legacy <name> (this can be done in the same night as another action). Be warned, if the target of your legacy already has a role when you die, your role will be lost forever. (Hint: you should !legacy a Citizen
Both murdered cops can do this. So is this a PR thing or just a cop thing? You allegedly have or at least had a PR so you seem to be in a position to answer this. Although if you're actually an executioner/vanishing role type thing then it'd be a bit weird to be able to !legacy like that even if it wasn't just a cop thing so maybe you're not the best person to ask.
Band wagoning more like banned wagoning.
☝(゚ヮ゚☝)
I mean... am I wrong, or did everything get quiet?
That's what happens when half the players get banned and the other half get dead. Wouldn't be too terribly surprised if there was maf lurking in the guys that are staying silent trying to encourage a quiet day of inaction. Just in case anyone's forgetting who's playing (that happened a bit last game with Unau and someone else):
hummerz5
processor
smittyw
different55
n1kf
jawapa
bimps
zumza
rhazzlefrazzle
Out of which I think I've actually seen everyone but N1KF post so that's not really a huge silent mob for maf to lurk in like I was expecting. Oh well. I guess I could get behind Rhaz if the day ended without anyone else but besides him being unusually full of life for this late in the game I don't have much reason to suspect him at all. He doesn't talk much.
To what?
Having the imminent threat of death lurking over their heads I guess.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
He doesn't talk much.
like, meta-game style? I guess I'm spending a lot of time comparing people to the status quo because evidently I don't know how to play well.
SO, is it wise to chip in at random with points that don't really reflect discussion at the time? Or, on the other end of the spectrum, is it wrong to always agree with bandwagons and the like? I would figure that these are both bad extremes.
Offline
I cannot decide how people are. based on nothing.
That's literally what mafia is. Mafia wouldn't have to say anything but we force them to say dumb things we can dramatize.
We should try dragging this game as long as possible and we can ration food and tell stories.
There's 9 of us left. 1 day lasts 72 hours and 1 night lasts 24 hours (4 irl days). If we no lynch from now on, we could live comfortably for about 3 more cycles, assuming there are 3 mafia. We can live out our remaining days for nearly 2 weeks while relaxing on a nice resort somewhere...
Offline
Mafia wouldn't have to say anything but we force them to say dumb things we can dramatize.
How do you plan on doing that when a person is banned? Oh right.
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
Different55 wrote:He doesn't talk much.
like, meta-game style? I guess I'm spending a lot of time comparing people to the status quo because evidently I don't know how to play well.
SO, is it wise to chip in at random with points that don't really reflect discussion at the time? Or, on the other end of the spectrum, is it wrong to always agree with bandwagons and the like? I would figure that these are both bad extremes.
uh idk he's just not talking a lot so it's hard to say anything one way or the other on him since he doesn't weigh in a lot on anything.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
the wagons, the votes, everything. I cannot decide how people are. based on nothing.
I really feel like Processor is hiding something in the "Smitty is town" thing. Kira seems to think smitty is hiding something too:
Smittyw's post when he says he's going to the church and he wouldn't allow any Mafias in: In short, he tried to use sarcasm but in a better way than Gosha.
I wouldn't have voted for Kira. I don't see where he done anything that made him look like mafia.
hummerz5 - I wonder if he has some sort of power role. Unsure which side to put him on though.
processor - Vaguely claimed neutral, said would side with town.
smittyw - I feel like Processor's posts saying "smitty is definitely town" are alluding to something. Proc dropped hints about his role, so I wouldn't doubt it.
different55 - I don't really know tbh.
n1kf - Been kinda quiet.
bimps - In the few posts that he's made, and now thinking proc is a neutral role, I'd say he's innocent.
zumza - I don't like how eager he is to prod people for inactivity. Almost seems like he's after a free kill. Could be just looking too far into it. I also don't like how he's throwing his votes around. It's not like he's jumping on whatever wagon comes along, but still odd.
rhazzlefrazzle - Hasn't done **** to benefit the game. Claims to have not read role card, or D2 chat. If he doesn't know he's mafia, then he's not a threat... at least for now.
Day 1 vote count (Blame HZ1/Onjit if it's wrong):
[8] Gosha: proc, devlin, smittyw, maxi123, hummerz5, kira, bimps, n1kf
[1] Maxi123 - Gosha
[1] Zumza - Different55
Day 2 vote count:
[6] Kira - Zumza, Processor, Devlin, SmittyW, Different55, Kira
[3] Processor - N1KF, MrJawapa, Hummerz5
Similarities:
hummerz, N1kf
Processor, Devlin, SmittyW
Processor, please explain the "Smitty is town".
In short: SmittyW, Rhaz, N1kf, Devlin seem like potential scum. Rhaz isn't a threat at the moment, would be fine lynching one of the other three.
Because of Processor's potential sub-posting, I'm voting for Smitty.
!unvote
!vote SmittyW
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
zumza - I don't like how eager he is to prod people for inactivity. Almost seems like he's after a free kill.
I'm into activity. We had a whole day in which there was no post.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Literally 6 people all with one vote right now we need to settle on someone. Going to go with the user I've found most suspicious.
except none of the users I find most suspicious actually have votes on them so in the interest of cooperation
!vote SmittyW
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
well I want to vote rhazzle but in the interest of time idk if that's worth asking. diff I kinda find you a bit suspect as well but idk why.
I can't really get behind a smitty lynch; I feel he's genuine, though zumza idk. Based on who already has a vote against them, I guess I choose this for the next two hours. Is time going to force us into a no-lynch this time around?
!vote rhazzlefrazzle
Offline
Offline
[ Started around 1733081142.256 - Generated in 0.148 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.09 MiB) ]