SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

peace · 2017-06-17 19:47:26

1K players online 1K worlds online it even says NaN if go to lobby someone one spams open worlds with fix your game this doesnt ifx the game but breaks it ee should make an open world limit like there cna only be 100 open worlds while 100 is still much but yeah it prevents people from sspammin ghtese worlds

kubapolish, pokemaster101, Mieaz, danielcool1, kreacher, Jedpogi, Weirdoverse

pokemaster101 · 2017-06-17 20:08:01

Do you even english brah? I know what you're saying but it took me like a minute to understand that gibberish.

peace · 2017-06-17 20:18:46

pokemaster101 wrote:

Do you even english brah? I know what you're saying but it took me like a minute to understand that gibberish.

im terible sorry englissh isnt my first language and im learning it from school and i try my best

Kirby, Sensei1, skullz17, kubapolish, Pingohits, Jedpogi, Insanity, Freckleface, PTU

pokemaster101 · 2017-06-17 20:20:39

Good for you! But yeah, the "fix ur game" open worlds are broke as heck.

Mieaz · 2017-06-17 20:33:14

it's not only open worlds, I bet if they added limit to open worlds the griefer will use registered accs to spam home worlds. Although it may take him some time to solve captchas for all these accs.

LukeM · 2017-06-17 20:35:47

peace men wrote:

pokemaster101 wrote:
Do you even english brah? I know what you're saying but it took me like a minute to understand that gibberish.
im terible sorry englissh isnt my first language and im learning it from school and i try my best

Its not that your english is bad (its not), just that you seem to rush and make a load of typos, as well as not using any punctuation
Make sure to use commas for small breaks, and full stops (periods if your American I think) / new lines when you start saying a new point
e.g.:
1K players online 1K worlds online, it even says NaN if go to lobby. Someone one spams open worlds with fix your game, this doesnt fix the game but breaks it
EE should make an open world limit, like there can only be 100 open worlds, 100 is still much but yeah it prevents people from spamming these worlds

See how just checking for spelling mistakes and adding punctuation makes it MUCH more easily readable, even if your grammar isnt always perfect

John · 2017-06-17 20:52:19

Mieaz wrote:

<snip>may take him some time to solve captchas for all these accs.

Those can be bypassed, unfortunately.

kreacher · 2017-06-17 20:56:37

this issue is so annoying, it doesnt just fill up the lobby, but it stops ppl from going on other worlds because it blocks out all the other ones even when you have more ppl online

peace

peace · 2017-06-17 21:34:24

destroyer123 wrote:

peace men wrote:
pokemaster101 wrote:
Do you even english brah? I know what you're saying but it took me like a minute to understand that gibberish.
im terible sorry englissh isnt my first language and im learning it from school and i try my best
Its not that your english is bad (its not), just that you seem to rush and make a load of typos, as well as not using any punctuation
Make sure to use commas for small breaks, and full stops (periods if your American I think) / new lines when you start saying a new point
e.g.:
1K players online 1K worlds online, it even says NaN if go to lobby. Someone one spams open worlds with fix your game, this doesnt fix the game but breaks it
EE should make an open world limit, like there can only be 100 open worlds, 100 is still much but yeah it prevents people from spamming these worlds
See how just checking for spelling mistakes and adding punctuation makes it MUCH more easily readable, even if your grammar isnt always perfect

yeah thats it but i dont use ppunction because i fidn it uneceressary on forums or so i use forums to just type fast something that belongs to a specific subject

Prodigy · 2017-06-17 22:06:10

I am at a point if I care about these "mods" in game or anything in game at all

Kira · 2017-06-17 22:11:07

Prodigy wrote:

I am at a point if I care about these "mods" in game or anything in game at all

LOL what

try making a sentence next time brah

Luka504

LukeM · 2017-06-17 22:23:43

peace men wrote:

destroyer123 wrote:
▼peace men wrote:
pokemaster101 wrote:
Do you even english brah? I know what you're saying but it took me like a minute to understand that gibberish.
im terible sorry englissh isnt my first language and im learning it from school and i try my best
Its not that your english is bad (its not), just that you seem to rush and make a load of typos, as well as not using any punctuation
Make sure to use commas for small breaks, and full stops (periods if your American I think) / new lines when you start saying a new point
e.g.:
1K players online 1K worlds online, it even says NaN if go to lobby. Someone one spams open worlds with fix your game, this doesnt fix the game but breaks it
EE should make an open world limit, like there can only be 100 open worlds, 100 is still much but yeah it prevents people from spamming these worlds
See how just checking for spelling mistakes and adding punctuation makes it MUCH more easily readable, even if your grammar isnt always perfect
yeah thats it but i dont use ppunction because i fidn it uneceressary on forums or so i use forums to just type fast something that belongs to a specific subject

It really is neccessary, plus forums arent really for typing things fast, thats more of a chat room thing (in which I'd agree you dont really need much punctuation)
If you want a more extreme example, a load of people dont understand / cant be bothered to understand what soniiiety writes because they include no punctuation at all, even in long paragraphs which makes it really hard to understand what they are talking about (if you're reading this soniiiety, you should also take the advice in my last message )

mrjawapa · 2017-06-18 00:33:53

The topic isn't about someone's knowledge of the English language.

N1KF

XxAtillaxX · 2017-06-18 04:00:37

There isn't any way to limit connections per IP on Player.IO. The infrastructure doesn't allow for it, without insane spaghetti BS with BigDB.
The rooms are distributed across numerous servers. It's not as easy as it seems, otherwise it would have been implemented long ago.

Jesse, LukeM

LukeM · 2017-06-18 12:30:40

I guess there could just be a limit of 20 or so open worlds in total, rather than doing it per player, and after that it just says "There are already enough open worlds, try joining an existing one" or something

Edit: Actually I think this is what peace meant in the first place

Prodigy · 2017-06-18 13:03:37

Kira wrote:

Prodigy wrote:
I am at a point if I care about these "mods" in game or anything in game at all
LOL what
try making a sentence next time brah

To be or not to be- that is the question: Whether tis' nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune or to take arms against the sea of troubles, and by opposing end them.

There you go, sorry I didn't make a proper sentence

kreacher

peace · 2017-06-19 13:06:10

destroyer123 wrote:

I guess there could just be a limit of 20 or so open worlds in total, rather than doing it per player, and after that it just says "There are already enough open worlds, try joining an existing one" or something
Edit: Actually I think this is what peace meant in the first place

yes i said a limit of 100 open worlds so you wont reach the limit only when you spam open worlds but 20 can be enough too

Mieaz, kreacher

kreacher · 2017-06-19 16:48:06

if u look at the worlds on their right now , look at the world ID, it says PWccnkpC-stop-lying-with-your-ban-guild-post fr some reason. theres also someone on all the worlds called imback( with random numbers afterwards)

peace · 2017-06-19 16:56:29

yep again this time they dont hav eopen world tag but are masive worlds i doudbt smoene has that much masive worlds even creating many alts still requires time

XxAtillaxX · 2017-06-19 17:46:34

destroyer123 wrote:

I guess there could just be a limit of 20 or so open worlds in total, rather than doing it per player, and after that it just says "There are already enough open worlds, try joining an existing one" or something
Edit: Actually I think this is what peace meant in the first place

If there was a limitation on open worlds, that would be utterly useless and restrictive to genuine players.
If they wanted to, they could very easily spam already existing worlds, which has happened in the past.

The only solution is moderation, there's no way to reliably communicate across rooms, it's an architectural limitation of Player.IO.
The solution is not room limits, it is enforcing a Captcha during suspicious activity to prevent automated flooding of rooms. If it were possible to implement, it would have been implemented long ago.

LukeM · 2017-06-19 18:22:01

XxAtillaxX wrote:

▼destroyer123 wrote:
I guess there could just be a limit of 20 or so open worlds in total, rather than doing it per player, and after that it just says "There are already enough open worlds, try joining an existing one" or something
Edit: Actually I think this is what peace meant in the first place
If there was a limitation on open worlds, that would be utterly useless and restrictive to genuine players.
If they wanted to, they could very easily spam already existing worlds, which has happened in the past.
The only solution is moderation, there's no way to reliably communicate across rooms, it's an architectural limitation of Player.IO.
The solution is not room limits, it is enforcing a Captcha during suspicious activity to prevent automated flooding of rooms. If it were possible to implement, it would have been implemented long ago.

It might be hard to set specifications on what merits a Captcha, would it be per player (if so, I think it was suggested above that the actual EE servers dont get to know your IPs, so this might be hard), or in total (in which case, how do we set this limit, as number of players (and therefore worlds) fluctuate)
Maybe there could be a Captcha for when guests open worlds, and maybe a limit for the number of times normal players can be logged in, although this wouldnt stop you if you had a load of alts

XxAtillaxX · 2017-06-19 18:28:48

destroyer123 wrote:

XxAtillaxX wrote:
▼destroyer123 wrote:
I guess there could just be a limit of 20 or so open worlds in total, rather than doing it per player, and after that it just says "There are already enough open worlds, try joining an existing one" or something
Edit: Actually I think this is what peace meant in the first place
If there was a limitation on open worlds, that would be utterly useless and restrictive to genuine players.
If they wanted to, they could very easily spam already existing worlds, which has happened in the past.
The only solution is moderation, there's no way to reliably communicate across rooms, it's an architectural limitation of Player.IO.
The solution is not room limits, it is enforcing a Captcha during suspicious activity to prevent automated flooding of rooms. If it were possible to implement, it would have been implemented long ago.
It might be hard to set specifications on what merits a Captcha, would it be per player (if so, I think it was suggested above that the actual EE servers dont get to know your IPs, so this might be hard), or in total (in which case, how do we set this limit, as number of players (and therefore worlds) fluctuate)
Maybe there could be a Captcha for when guests open worlds, and maybe a limit for the number of times normal players can be logged in, although this wouldnt stop you if you had a load of alts

It's very much possible to obtain an IP address per user however it is not possible to reliably track things such as how many times they are in any given room, since every room is architecturally independent from the rest.
It entirely depends on how much the game is being attacked, it could be per-IP or to every user, and given people don't join worlds every 5 seconds, it wouldn't be that big of a deal. Regardless, it can't be reliably implemented with Player.IO currently.

Weirdoverse · 2017-06-20 06:55:03

i guess it would be better if older account, like a week old, could only create 3 open worlds at a time, but the limit should kept at about 50
Sorry for my bad england

XxAtillaxX · 2017-06-20 07:32:30

Weirdoverse wrote:

i guess it would be better if older account, like a week old, could only create 3 open worlds at a time, but the limit should kept at about 50
Sorry for my bad england

It's not hard to acquire old accounts nor is it difficult to wait a week prior to attacking. The primary issue still remains that there is no way to know which rooms they are in reliably.

realmaster42 · 2017-06-20 14:31:15

Seems to be happening everyday now.
It seems to be reporting problems in the EE society because; 2nd day it was all about Phinarose and something about Ban Guilds; exactly. Phinarose's Ban Guilds post. They seem to think it is fake for some reason we don't know about. Also, some worlds contained: "Definetelynot i0l"... weird, uh?

Now we have this, happening again.

Seems like they want to stop the cringe of the G4P "meme", which is a stupid idea of considering it a "meme", in my opinion.
World IDs seem to be following this pattern: "requestedby-mysterion-yuvdidthis"...

Could it be framing?
They are saying MYSTERION requested all of this; but look, MYSTERION also hates the G4P meme.
What's worse is the fact that MYSTERION is the victim.

But could this be another of MYSTERION's haters? It could be, to frame mysterion and make he get banned.
I honestly believe this isn't MYSTERION's fault.

ALSO, "yuvdidthis", a.k.a. yuv did this. If I recall correctly, YUV was the guy who banned WEAKEST and a bunch of other players in the EE society with his "hacks"...
So this could well possibly be YUV.

However, YUV claims to have been banned before (unbanned himself) and own alts (I0L).
I0L named spammed worlds, this all indicates YUV did this.

But how and why is he doing this?
P.S.: Shoutouts to SHOWPATH who apparently FIXED room data and the spam, but it still happens. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#1 2017-06-17 19:47:26

SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#2 2017-06-17 20:08:01

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#3 2017-06-17 20:18:46

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#4 2017-06-17 20:20:39

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#5 2017-06-17 20:33:14, last edited by Mieaz (2017-06-17 20:33:38)

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#6 2017-06-17 20:35:47, last edited by LukeM (2017-06-17 20:36:53)

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#7 2017-06-17 20:52:19

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#8 2017-06-17 20:56:37, last edited by kreacher (2017-06-17 20:57:10)

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#9 2017-06-17 21:34:24

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#10 2017-06-17 22:06:10

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#11 2017-06-17 22:11:07

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#12 2017-06-17 22:23:43

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#13 2017-06-18 00:33:53

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#14 2017-06-18 04:00:37

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#15 2017-06-18 12:30:40, last edited by LukeM (2017-06-18 12:31:57)

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#16 2017-06-18 13:03:37

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#17 2017-06-19 13:06:10

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#18 2017-06-19 16:48:06

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#19 2017-06-19 16:56:29

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#20 2017-06-19 17:46:34, last edited by XxAtillaxX (2017-06-19 17:47:09)

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#21 2017-06-19 18:22:01, last edited by LukeM (2017-06-19 18:22:33)

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#22 2017-06-19 18:28:48

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#23 2017-06-20 06:55:03

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#24 2017-06-20 07:32:30

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

#25 2017-06-20 14:31:15

Re: SPAM WORLD AGAIN MOD READ ASAP!!!!

Board footer