Official Everybody Edits Forums
Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 2017-05-16 03:52:18, last edited by SirJosh3917 (2017-05-16 14:17:57)
- SirJosh3917
- Formerly ninjasupeatsninja
- From: USA
- Joined: 2015-04-05
- Posts: 2,095
Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
spambler is nvd which is why nvd.com isn't claimed but spambler.com is
Offline
#2 2017-05-16 03:56:07
- Kaleb
- Formerly Kaleb123
- From: California of America
- Joined: 2015-02-19
- Posts: 1,263
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
No... Spambler was an admin that changed their name temporarily...
I don't believe Rdash is remotely close to being an admin...
Offline
#3 2017-05-16 10:29:34
- Priddle
- Member
- From: The Netherlands
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 454
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
No. That's me 
Offline
- Wooted by: (6)
#5 2017-05-16 12:55:11
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,211
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
NVD wrote:No. That's me
So...rdash = nvd?
sampler = nvd
nvd => rdash
Offline
#6 2017-05-16 14:18:20
- SirJosh3917
- Formerly ninjasupeatsninja
- From: USA
- Joined: 2015-04-05
- Posts: 2,095
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
Edited title to clarify.
Can you take a stance on this nvd? are you rdash?
Offline
#7 2017-05-16 14:34:04
- Priddle
- Member
- From: The Netherlands
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 454
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
I mean, I am spambler
nvd = spambler
rdash = rdash
Offline
- Wooted by:
#8 2017-05-16 14:36:52
- SirSoul
- Member
- Joined: 2016-09-21
- Posts: 43
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
But are you also rdash?!?!"?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Offline
#9 2017-05-16 15:01:08
Offline
- Wooted by:
#10 2017-05-16 16:01:35
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,211
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
SirSoul wrote:But are you also rdash?!?!"?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
Then he would have said nvd = spambler = rdash. So no. rdash = rdash and not NVD.
well
2+3 = 5
and
1 + 4 = 1 + 4
but it doesn't exclude that 1 + 4 = 5 and 2+3
kek
Offline
- Wooted by:
#11 2017-05-16 19:48:28
- CJMaeder
- Member
- From: Lame Land
- Joined: 2015-04-06
- Posts: 219
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
I am rdash
Lame!
Offline
- Wooted by: (10)
#12 2017-05-16 20:12:55
- Latif
- Member
- From: The Netherlands
- Joined: 2015-03-13
- Posts: 1,206
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
I am rdash
No you are CJMaeder
Offline
#13 2017-05-16 21:43:15
- Pingohits
- Banned
- From: aids lizard
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 7,591
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
CJMaeder wrote:I am rdash
No you are CJMaeder
if nvd = rdash and rdash = cjmaeder, then by the trusty transitive property nvd = cjmaeder our world is a lie
Offline
- Wooted by:
#14 2017-05-16 23:58:26
- Xfrogman43
- Member
- From: need to find a new home
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 4,174
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
cjmaeder is lame though
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
- Wooted by: (4)
#15 2017-05-17 10:08:52
- Kaleb
- Formerly Kaleb123
- From: California of America
- Joined: 2015-02-19
- Posts: 1,263
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
can we close this topic already?
Offline
#16 2017-05-17 11:38:01
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,211
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
cjmaeder is lame though
Sure, but Jesse if eejesse
Offline
#17 2017-05-17 13:36:27
- John
- Member
- Joined: 2019-01-11
- Posts: 2,011
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
im not lame
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
#18 2017-05-17 16:10:34
- rdash
- Member
- Joined: 2015-02-25
- Posts: 39
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
Everything is this thread is true
rdash
Offline
- Wooted by:
#20 2017-05-17 17:08:51
- realmaster42
- Formerly marcoantonimsantos
- From: ̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍̍
- Joined: 2015-02-20
- Posts: 1,380
- Website
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
cjmaeder is lame though
tbh cjmaeder isn't lame at all compared to jesse
ON-TOPIC: rdash isn't nvd, but spambler is nvd.
Offline
#21 2017-05-17 17:42:09
- Gosha
- Member
- From: Russia
- Joined: 2015-03-15
- Posts: 6,211
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
Xfrogman43 wrote:cjmaeder is lame though
tbh cjmaeder isn't lame at all compared to jesse
ON-TOPIC: rdash isn't nvd, but spambler is nvd.
lol cjmaeder IS lame, he even changed his name several times
Offline
- Wooted by:
#22 2017-05-17 19:52:23
- Zumza
- Member
- From: root
- Joined: 2015-02-17
- Posts: 4,656
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
We're all the sons of God
Since this has as much as a contribution to the topic like any other posts above. Seriously are we stoped in a loop in this discussion?
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
#23 2017-05-17 20:06:16
- mutantdevle
- Moderation Team
- From: Hell
- Joined: 2015-03-31
- Posts: 3,848
- Website
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
We're all the sons of God
Eww, no thanks. Satan is more my man.
Offline
- Wooted by: (3)
#24 2017-05-18 05:54:08
- Xfrogman43
- Member
- From: need to find a new home
- Joined: 2015-02-15
- Posts: 4,174
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
Xfrogman43 wrote:cjmaeder is lame though
tbh cjmaeder isn't lame at all compared to jesse
ON-TOPIC: rdash isn't nvd, but spambler is nvd.
thanks zoey aaaaaaaaaaaand thanks latif for the avatar
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
#25 2017-05-18 14:32:51
- CJMaeder
- Member
- From: Lame Land
- Joined: 2015-04-06
- Posts: 219
Re: Is this true? rdash = spambler = nvd
marcoantonimsantos wrote:Xfrogman43 wrote:cjmaeder is lame though
tbh cjmaeder isn't lame at all compared to jesse
ON-TOPIC: rdash isn't nvd, but spambler is nvd.
You insult me.
Lame!
Offline
- Wooted by: (2)
[ Started around 1732616842.0331 - Generated in 0.153 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.89 MiB (Peak: 2.17 MiB) ]