Official Everybody Edits Forums

Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?

You are not logged in.

#1 2017-03-11 16:12:54

Hashy
Formerly oxidizer
From: Underground
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 210

godmode

how about a godmode that doesn't allow you to grab coins or ungod anywhere, like once you ungod it spawns you back to when you received god.

would help from people trying to complete the world early.


2.0

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#2 2017-03-11 16:24:33

dcomet
Member
From: Dipstick Kingdom
Joined: 2016-11-20
Posts: 788

Re: godmode

Like a freecam mode?


1xxoWGb.png
X6pVnTA.png
@MAMETCHl on twitter for the pfp artist, @snuffyowo on twitter for the character drawn in the pfp.

Offline

#3 2017-03-11 17:43:28

Hashy
Formerly oxidizer
From: Underground
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 210

Re: godmode

Basically yeah.


2.0

Offline

Wooted by:

#4 2017-03-11 20:27:39, last edited by Slabdrill (2017-03-11 20:28:03)

Slabdrill
Formerly 12345678908642
From: canada
Joined: 2015-08-15
Posts: 3,402
Website

Re: godmode

i like this one //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

/freefly could be the command, free for use for everyone
potentially a world option (off by default) to prevent use of the command


suddenly random sig change

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#5 2017-03-11 20:30:18

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: godmode

12345678908642 wrote:

i like this one //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

/freefly could be the command, free for use for everyone
potentially a world option (off by default) to prevent use of the command

...or just an effect block? #EffectsNotCommands

Offline

#6 2017-03-11 20:38:08

Slabdrill
Formerly 12345678908642
From: canada
Joined: 2015-08-15
Posts: 3,402
Website

Re: godmode

N1KF wrote:
12345678908642 wrote:

i like this one //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

/freefly could be the command, free for use for everyone
potentially a world option (off by default) to prevent use of the command

...or just an effect block? #EffectsNotCommands

i prefer a command so you can use it whenever


suddenly random sig change

Offline

#7 2017-03-11 20:52:18

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: godmode

12345678908642 wrote:
N1KF wrote:
12345678908642 wrote:

i like this one //forums.everybodyedits.com/img/smilies/tongue

/freefly could be the command, free for use for everyone
potentially a world option (off by default) to prevent use of the command

...or just an effect block? #EffectsNotCommands

i prefer a command so you can use it whenever

...or a command that lets you add effects to players? #EffectsButWithCommands

Offline

#8 2017-03-11 20:52:59

dcomet
Member
From: Dipstick Kingdom
Joined: 2016-11-20
Posts: 788

Re: godmode

A command that everyone could use would break some maps that rely on you not seeing parts of a level


1xxoWGb.png
X6pVnTA.png
@MAMETCHl on twitter for the pfp artist, @snuffyowo on twitter for the character drawn in the pfp.

Offline

Wooted by: (2)

#9 2017-03-11 20:56:27

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: godmode

DarkComet wrote:

A command that everyone could use would break some maps that rely on you not seeing parts of a level

12345678908642 addressed that in his post:

12345678908642 wrote:

potentially a world option (off by default) to prevent use of the command

Offline

#10 2017-03-12 05:51:36

Hashy
Formerly oxidizer
From: Underground
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 210

Re: godmode

It would be better to be a command that only the owner can apply or a setting once clicking on somebody name with a action (free cam)


2.0

Offline

#11 2017-03-12 06:08:45

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: godmode

oxidizer wrote:

It would be better to be a command that only the owner can apply or a setting once clicking on somebody name with a action (free cam)

Why?

Offline

#12 2017-03-12 07:36:58

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM
Member
From: ͂́͐̆̍̿̌̄̀̇͛̀̈́͋̈́̌͑͌́̍̽̂͊̅͋̕͘
Joined: 2015-02-18
Posts: 455

Re: godmode

N1KF wrote:
oxidizer wrote:

It would be better to be a command that only the owner can apply or a setting once clicking on somebody name with a action (free cam)

Why?

Yea, we need people seeing the ending of a level or seeing a code before you pass the land.


WM malfuntion VgPb7gb.png

Offline

#13 2017-03-12 17:14:24

Hashy
Formerly oxidizer
From: Underground
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 210

Re: godmode

Or just have a quick button like how G for godmode, could have C for cam.


2.0

Offline

#14 2017-03-12 22:21:44

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: godmode

WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:
N1KF wrote:
oxidizer wrote:

It would be better to be a command that only the owner can apply or a setting once clicking on somebody name with a action (free cam)

Why?

Yea, we need people seeing the ending of a level or seeing a code before you pass the land.

No, like, why a command over an effect block? If we had a command that adds effects, everybody wins #EffectsButWithCommands

Offline

#15 2017-03-12 23:05:30

skullz17
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 6,699

Re: godmode

N1KF wrote:
WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM wrote:
N1KF wrote:
oxidizer wrote:

It would be better to be a command that only the owner can apply or a setting once clicking on somebody name with a action (free cam)

Why?

Yea, we need people seeing the ending of a level or seeing a code before you pass the land.

No, like, why a command over an effect block? If we had a command that adds effects, everybody wins #EffectsButWithCommands

No, because then only the owner could use it. It needs to be a separate command that can be used by anyone.


m3gPDRb.png

thx for sig bobithan

Offline

#16 2017-03-12 23:11:08

N1KF
Wiki Mod
From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ From: ဪဪဪဪဪ
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 11,114
Website

Re: godmode

skullz17 wrote:
N1KF wrote:

No, like, why a command over an effect block? If we had a command that adds effects, everybody wins #EffectsButWithCommands

No, because then only the owner could use it. It needs to be a separate command that can be used by anyone.

But you could have an effect block in your world, allowing anybody to use it.

Offline

#17 2017-03-12 23:30:32

skullz17
Member
Joined: 2015-02-15
Posts: 6,699

Re: godmode

N1KF wrote:
skullz17 wrote:
N1KF wrote:

No, like, why a command over an effect block? If we had a command that adds effects, everybody wins #EffectsButWithCommands

No, because then only the owner could use it. It needs to be a separate command that can be used by anyone.

But you could have an effect block in your world, allowing anybody to use it.

Well sometimes it should be the user's choice when they want to use it. They shouldn't be limited to using it only where there are effect blocks. There might be worlds where you want to limit it, but there are also worlds where you don't want to limit it, therefore there should be an option for both. i.e.: both an effect block and a command/button.


m3gPDRb.png

thx for sig bobithan

Offline

Wooted by:
skullz171489357832650593

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB

[ Started around 1732702815.6751 - Generated in 0.139 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.66 MiB (Peak: 1.88 MiB) ]