Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Would also like to make a notice for Atilla:
You seem to imply .net 2.0 is deprecated (correct me if I'm wrong).
You might've heard of Unity.
It runs mostly on .NET 2.0 and partially 3.5.
Conclusion: Unity C# programming = (partially) deprecated?
I would also like to point out that most XP running system are from business' as it's far to expensive to update all their stuff and will likely result in all kinds of problems (and HR doesn't see a reason to update "It works, then why change?").
Then still, the PCs that use XP are generally old bricks. And with a reason. They can't afford a newer system, and they can't run windows 7 smoothly either, and it'd be pretty useless to update to Vista since before they would know, support for that one would drop too and they're back on start.
So for some. Yes, it's their problem, but for a lot of others they simply don't have a choice. They literally can't upgrade their PC.
Offline
[ Started around 1732393896.6364 - Generated in 0.029 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.34 MiB (Peak: 1.42 MiB) ]