Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
not needed
Tell me at leats one countra argument.
Offline
AnatolyEE wrote:12345678908642 wrote:not needed
Tell me at least one coutra argument.
tell me at least one argument
his counter argument is that the feature is utterly useless
To have a great style and woot spamming yourself. So you show that at least one person supports your post.
maxi123 wrote:AnatolyEE wrote:12345678908642 wrote:not needed
Tell me at least one coutra argument.
tell me at least one argument
his counter argument is that the feature is utterly uselessTo have a great style and woot spamming yourself. So you show that at least one person supports your post.
that's pathetic.
Offline
Why do you need to show that you support your own post? You're the one who posted it.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
Soon enough, every other post would have a self-woot, making woots useless, as we can't determine the good ones anymore
Offline
Soon enough, every other post would have a self-woot, making woots useless, as we can't determine the good ones anymore
Well no, it would be exactly the same just with one extra woot on each post.
thx for sig bobithan
Offline
12345678908642 wrote:not needed
Tell me at leats one countra argument.
You'll look like you want attention. Also, nobody will woot with you.
It's embarrassing when people like their own posts on Facebook and it'd be embarrassing here.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738425788.4811 - Generated in 0.049 seconds, 14 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.57 MiB (Peak: 1.73 MiB) ]