Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
It was prooved that the entire community is splited into 3 parts:
Mathematicals (Physical, Chemical, Biological, work with Computers, ...)
Lanuage-Lovers (All Languages, Teaching, History !!, Religion, ...)
Can-Do-Everything-With-Hands (People can't specify in the groups above, can only do something with hands, ...)
I am a Mathematical, and who are you?
who exactly prooven that the community is splited into these parts? what is the prooof?
Offline
I will go in the northeast direction, slightly more north along the compass
Programming is more a cross-disciplinary subject.
Mathematics(e.g. statistics) Lovers(e.g. translators, virtual history) Can-Do-Everything-With-Hands(e.g. have you heard of robots?)
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
who exactly prooven that the community is splited into these parts? what is the prooof?
People can't specify in the groups above
Ergo, you have two essential groups. Those that fit the qualification, and those that don't. Who knows if the qualifications are correct, but you can say with certainty that all elements will fall into either set based on how the second set is defined.
Offline
Offline
One direction
Right direction
Offline
personally i prefer it to be like this:
Pragmatism (logical, problem solving, such as Mathematics or Physics)
Aesthetics (concerned with beauty and taste, such as Artist or Poet)
this splits all careers into two parts, with some in between (for example, an architect)
i've yet to think of a term for the "in-betweens"
Offline
Left.
Those groups aren't separate.
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
down the hall to the left
Offline
Ratburntro44 wrote:who exactly prooven that the community is splited into these parts? what is the prooof?
AnatolyEE wrote:People can't specify in the groups above
Ergo, you have two essential groups. Those that fit the qualification, and those that don't. Who knows if the qualifications are correct, but you can say with certainty that all elements will fall into either set based on how the second set is defined.
but the third group/"second set" also says "can only do something with hands"
Offline
hummerz5 wrote:Ratburntro44 wrote:who exactly prooven that the community is splited into these parts? what is the prooof?
AnatolyEE wrote:People can't specify in the groups above
Ergo, you have two essential groups. Those that fit the qualification, and those that don't. Who knows if the qualifications are correct, but you can say with certainty that all elements will fall into either set based on how the second set is defined.
but the third group/"second set" also says "can only do something with hands"
Alas I skimmed over that with assuming the comma was an "OR" operator. Even if it was an OR, I suppose that would still confuse things because they could fit in the top categories but also be good with the hands.
Alright, this makes no sense.
Offline
I'd find it funny if a study used the term 'Can-Do-Everything-With-Hands,' lol
Those categories are all a bit too vague or specific. Like a single grouping for blue collar work?
But anyways, I'm leaning more to an art / creative direction.
Although I got a real lack of motivation at the moment. No progress any way!
Oh and take the 16 personalities test if you haven't already. It's interesting.
[only logs in here when drunk]
EE Pics
______
Offline
Well i'm studying mainly social studies + language if that answers the topics question.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
personally i prefer it to be like this:
Pragmatism (logical, problem solving, such as Mathematics or Physics)
Aesthetics (concerned with beauty and taste, such as Artist or Poet)this splits all careers into two parts, with some in between (for example, an architect)
i've yet to think of a term for the "in-betweens"
ambidextrous?
i know many people who are inbetween.
idk the only thing i care about is music but i know thatll kill me so idk probably a career in maths or some ****
Offline
realized i never actually answered the question
probably something in the arts
i already am quite fond of:
-filmmaking
-musical composition
-graphic design
-game design
personally game design is optimal, but not sure if there's a good market for it. filmmaking i would have to put more effort in if i become a film major
graphic design would be tough unless im extremely good at it, i would probably have to live frugally, have a main job and freelance on the side
musical composition is a bit iffy. i enjoy it, but i strongly believe it's extremely hard to make a living out of it. might just create songs as a hobby
if none of these things work out, i'll probably go into the sciences (math and physics probably)
Offline
Studying Architecture and Urbanism in uni atm
I suppose it actually fits all 3 areas mentioned in the OP
Offline
I can do stuff with my hands!
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1714141102.8003 - Generated in 0.053 seconds, 15 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.65 MiB (Peak: 1.87 MiB) ]