Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
A decent number of topics in the sub-forums have titles which tell you nothing about the contents of the thread - you have to read the post to find out what it's about.
Is there any official requirement for thread titles to be relevant or helpful in describing the post, like an actual title?
For instance, I could've called this post "I noticed something...", "Halp pls", or even something clickbait and cancerous like "OMGG DO SOMTHING!1!!1!" and although those titles would be completed useless, afaik nothing would happen.
If there's nothing in place, could a minimum standard of relevance be set and upheld?
One bot to rule them all, one bot to find them. One bot to bring them all... and with this cliché blind them.
Offline
There's no requirement but there's a strong recommendation. That could change, though.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
2015 April fools
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1741244749.5369 - Generated in 0.030 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.38 MiB (Peak: 1.47 MiB) ]