Moderators

Pigglet · 2016-10-05 22:04:42

Oink. What is your opinion on the current forum moderators?
Should anyone be demoted?
Should anyone be promoted?

Annoymity enabled to prevent further damage.

skullz17 · 2016-10-05 22:09:48

Perfectly fine.

SirJosh3917

hummerz5 · 2016-10-05 23:36:05

hi just a moderator passing through

so yes this is a great debate but it belongs in the Forum Discussion area, so imma go ahead and push it over there.

Pigglet

mrjawapa · 2016-10-06 00:55:25

Zoey is doing much better

The news mods are pretty good

Proc should be removed

nb4 "ur just mad at proc"

I don't see any reason to have Proc as a forum admin. According to diff, he's handled 5 reports, where HummerZ5 handled 59. ****?

And I thought there was a rule put in place, when the new forums were created, that staff would be kept separate. That rule was broken.

Different55 · 2016-10-06 02:27:59

Those numbers are pretty old, hummerz5 has actually passed me in the number of reports handled now. He's at 87 while I'm slacking off at 80. Going to catch back up though.

+---------+-------------+
| reports | username    |
+---------+-------------+
|       5 | Processor   |
|      25 | Zoey2070    |
|      33 | BuzzerBee   |
|      36 | Bobithan    |
|      80 | Different55 |
|      87 | hummerz5    |
+---------+-------------+

Pingohits, mrjawapa, kubapolish, TaskManager, Hostage, St1ckS4m(EE)

mrjawapa · 2016-10-06 02:31:41

It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.

XxAtillaxX · 2016-10-06 02:33:36

MrJaWapa wrote:

It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.

There aren't an infinite amount of reports, and people don't have an infinite amount of free time during their day, nor is life invariant.

32OrtonEdge32dh · 2016-10-06 02:33:41

MrJaWapa wrote:

It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.

Solution: Every two weeks, remove all mods and add new ones. We'll approach infinite reports handled soon.

Schlog · 2016-10-06 02:34:53

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:

MrJaWapa wrote:
It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.
Solution: Every two weeks, remove all mods and add new ones. We'll approach infinite reports handled soon.

but who will make the infinite reports

32OrtonEdge32dh · 2016-10-06 02:35:52

Ninja wrote:

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:
It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.
Solution: Every two weeks, remove all mods and add new ones. We'll approach infinite reports handled soon.
but who will make the infinite reports

As long as there's life in me I can find something not worth reporting to report, you know that.

mrjawapa · 2016-10-06 03:16:06

XxAtillaxX wrote:

MrJaWapa wrote:
It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.
There aren't an infinite amount of reports, and people don't have an infinite amount of free time during their day, nor is life invariant.

Fair point.

But I would expect someone who's been on the staff since the birth of the forums, to have handled more than 5 reports.

Some how Hummer has managed to find the time to check 87 reports in ~ 1 month. Proc has only found time for 5 reports in 1.5 years?

It has little to do with free time, and more to do with laziness.

Bobithan, Schlog

Ratburntro44 · 2016-10-06 03:17:51

Ninja wrote:

32OrtonEdge32dh wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:
It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.
Solution: Every two weeks, remove all mods and add new ones. We'll approach infinite reports handled soon.
but who will make the infinite reports

all the mod abuse from getting new people as mods every two weeks will bring in the reports

MrJaWapa wrote:

But I would expect someone who's been on the staff since the birth of the forums, to have handled more than 5 reports.
Some how Hummer has managed to find the time to check 87 reports in ~ 1 month. Proc has only found time for 5 reports in 1.5 years?
It has little to do with free time, and more to do with laziness.

admins don't exist to handle reports, though they are able to it is the job of mods, diff is an exception out of his own choice, proc has presumably only had reason to on rare occasion

Zoey2070 · 2016-10-06 03:26:15

MrJaWapa wrote:

Some how Hummer has managed to find the time to check 87 reports in ~ 1 month. Proc has only found time for 5 reports in 1.5 years?

and you think i did 25 reports in the last 1.5 years?

or... maybe... that list isn't lifetime reports, because we've sure as hell have had more than 266 reports

Different55 · 2016-10-06 03:36:32

MrJaWapa wrote:

XxAtillaxX wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:
It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.
There aren't an infinite amount of reports, and people don't have an infinite amount of free time during their day, nor is life invariant.
Fair point.
But I would expect someone who's been on the staff since the birth of the forums, to have handled more than 5 reports.
Some how Hummer has managed to find the time to check 87 reports in ~ 1 month. Proc has only found time for 5 reports in 1.5 years?
It has little to do with free time, and more to do with laziness.

These numbers don't date back the whole life of the forums, it's a relatively recent thing. Before, the forums only kept the 10 most recently zapped reports and deleted reports the second they fell to #11, so these numbers are only accurate starting from around August 5 2016.

mrjawapa · 2016-10-06 04:01:37

Ratburntro44 wrote:

admins don't exist to handle reports, though they are able to it is the job of mods, diff is an exception out of his own choice, proc has presumably only had reason to on rare occasion

Please, tell me what Proc has been doing for the forums then. I would love to know what great contributions Proc has made as a forum admin, since checking reports surely aren't his thing.

Different55 wrote:

These numbers don't date back the whole life of the forums, it's a relatively recent thing. Before, the forums only kept the 10 most recently zapped reports and deleted reports the second they fell to #11, so these numbers are only accurate starting from around August 5 2016.

Ah, I misunderstood.

Doesn't change anything, in my mind anyway.

XxAtillaxX · 2016-10-06 04:08:28

MrJaWapa wrote:

Ah, I misunderstood.
Doesn't change anything, in my mind anyway.

I'm wrong but I can't accept it!

mrjawapa · 2016-10-06 05:05:40

XxAtillaxX wrote:

MrJaWapa wrote:
Ah, I misunderstood.
Doesn't change anything, in my mind anyway.
I'm wrong but I can't accept it!

First of all, Get over yourself. You're such a ****' narcissist.

If you can quit stroking your ego for a second, I'll explain my post to you.

I misunderstood how long of a time period the data covered.
I even said:

MrJaWapa wrote:

Ah, I misunderstood.

I suppose that being intellectually superior to everyone else on this planet, you've never misunderstood anything. You see, it's this thing where people get things mixed up, or are confused on something. It happens a lot to us plebs.

MrJaWapa wrote:

Doesn't change anything, in my mind anyway.

It doesn't matter if the data was from the beginning of the forums, from 6 months ago, 2 months ago, or a few weeks ago. It's very evident that Proc puts in little effort. He hasn't even done 1/4 of the report checking of the next person.

Onjit · 2016-10-06 05:07:41

Different55 wrote:

Those numbers are pretty old, hummerz5 has actually passed me in the number of reports handled now. He's at 87 while I'm slacking off at 80. Going to catch back up though.
+---------+-------------+
| reports | username    |
+---------+-------------+
|       5 | Processor   |
|      25 | Zoey2070    |
|      33 | BuzzerBee   |
|      36 | Bobithan    |
|      80 | Different55 |
|      87 | hummerz5    |
+---------+-------------+

Doesn't include the one report I handled when I had mod powers.
You wound me.

mrjawapa

XxAtillaxX · 2016-10-06 05:25:17

MrJaWapa wrote:

XxAtillaxX wrote:
MrJaWapa wrote:
Ah, I misunderstood.
Doesn't change anything, in my mind anyway.
I'm wrong but I can't accept it!
I misunderstood how long of a time period the data covered.
I even said:
MrJaWapa wrote:
Ah, I misunderstood.
I suppose that being intellectually superior to everyone else on this planet, you've never misunderstood anything. You see, it's this thing where people get things mixed up, or are confused on something. It happens a lot to us plebs.

I know what confusion is, and that you are very confused.
It does matter because again, not everyone is stuck to their computer, people have lives, and the amount of time they are able to spend on the forums varies in co-ordinance with the other activities in their lives.
Is it really so hard to believe that some have more free time than others? It shouldn't.

MrJaWapa wrote:

It doesn't matter if the data was from the beginning of the forums, from 6 months ago, 2 months ago, or a few weeks ago. It's very evident that Proc puts in little effort. He hasn't even done 1/4 of the report checking of the next person.

See above.

mrjawapa · 2016-10-06 05:52:59

XxAtillaxX wrote:

Is it really so hard to believe that some have more free time than others? It shouldn't.

Nope. I completely understand being busy. I even agreed with you when you said it the first time.

XxAtillaxX wrote:

not everyone is stuck to their computer, people have lives, and the amount of time they are able to spend on the forums varies in co-ordinance with the other activities in their lives.

Please explain how Buzzerbee, who has a job (fairly sure anyway) and goes to school, can check more reports than Zoey, who is stuck to their computer and has nothing but free time.

> laziness

If he really is so busy that he can't help on the forums, he shouldn't be a forum admin. Why have him on the team when he doesn't do anything.

He's not even supposed to be on the forum staff.

Koya · 2016-10-06 09:02:42

MrJaWapa wrote:

It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.

It might have been me who gave hummerz their numbers :x

Different55 · 2016-10-06 12:58:19

Koya wrote:

MrJaWapa wrote:
It's insane how the new mods are doing more work than the people who have been here for a long time.
It might have been me who gave hummerz their numbers :x

Not so much hummerz as me, but you did give hummerz a nice boost as well.

+---------+-------------+
| reports | username    |
+---------+-------------+
|       2 | Processor   |
|       3 | Bobithan    |
|       3 | Zoey2070    |
|       4 | BuzzerBee   |
|      14 | hummerz5    |
|      26 | Different55 |
+---------+-------------+

BTW I probably don't need to say this but since this was running before hummerz and Buzzer came on the scene these numbers include all of their reports while it's missing nearly all of the rest of our reports.

So technically I'm still ahead of hummerz.

Xfrogman43

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#1 2016-10-05 22:04:42, last edited by Pigglet (2016-10-05 22:05:01)

Moderators

#2 2016-10-05 22:09:48

Re: Moderators

#3 2016-10-05 23:36:05

Re: Moderators

#4 2016-10-06 00:55:25

Re: Moderators

#5 2016-10-06 02:27:59

Re: Moderators

#6 2016-10-06 02:31:41

Re: Moderators

#7 2016-10-06 02:33:36

Re: Moderators

#8 2016-10-06 02:33:41

Re: Moderators

#9 2016-10-06 02:34:53

Re: Moderators

#10 2016-10-06 02:35:52

Re: Moderators

#11 2016-10-06 03:16:06

Re: Moderators

#12 2016-10-06 03:17:51, last edited by Ratburntro44 (2016-10-06 03:21:18)

Re: Moderators

#13 2016-10-06 03:26:15

Re: Moderators

#14 2016-10-06 03:36:32

Re: Moderators

#15 2016-10-06 04:01:37

Re: Moderators

#16 2016-10-06 04:08:28

Re: Moderators

#17 2016-10-06 05:05:40

Re: Moderators

#18 2016-10-06 05:07:41

Re: Moderators

#19 2016-10-06 05:25:17

Re: Moderators

#20 2016-10-06 05:52:59

Re: Moderators

#21 2016-10-06 09:02:42

Re: Moderators

#22 2016-10-06 12:58:19, last edited by Different55 (2016-10-06 12:59:20)

Re: Moderators

Board footer