Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
I think we should demote processor to developer. Many people can clearly see he is being manipulated by zoey. Mainly because if he doesnt do something zoey wants, she will be mad at him. Clearly in this state he shouldnt be able to handle reports and such.
Discuss
>being manipulated by zoey
weak argument tbh
and pretty insulting too
gr8 b8 tho
is there any evidence of this happening?
While I do agree that she does have some power to get what she wants via Processor, I have full faith that Processor won't do anything rash, which was my biggest problem with Zoey. She's generally a decent moderator, but on a bad day, she can be a bit more trigger-happy than I'm comfortable with.
I have not seen Zoey influence Proc on any game decisions.
Though, I have seen her influence him on the forums/IRC.
This is a minor problem... Not even a problem.
They are in a relationship, and I would have to argue that just because Zoey gets "special" treatment doesn't mean proc is "abusing" his admin powers. What if NOU, NVD, TOOP, or THANEL had someone close and special to them on EE, they would be doing the same thing processor is doing because that is what being in a relationship does to a person.
Though, I have seen her influence him on the forums
I don't play the game much anymore so I probably don't have any say so I'm not sure about game influence, but would you mind telling me where you see zoey influencing proc on forum stuff?
This is a minor problem... Not even a problem.
They are in a relationship, and I would have to argue that just because Zoey gets "special" treatment doesn't mean proc is "abusing" his admin powers. What if NOU, NVD, TOOP, or THANEL had someone close and special to them on EE, they would be doing the same thing processor is doing because that is what being in a relationship does to a person.
Yes, we need virgin leaders to represent our game fairly.
SadSkeleton wrote:This is a minor problem... Not even a problem.
They are in a relationship, and I would have to argue that just because Zoey gets "special" treatment doesn't mean proc is "abusing" his admin powers. What if NOU, NVD, TOOP, or THANEL had someone close and special to them on EE, they would be doing the same thing processor is doing because that is what being in a relationship does to a person.Yes, we need virgin leaders to represent our game fairly.
Yes and No,
You can't take away someone's right to love/hate, otherwise the staffing would be very square and not that much of an interactive person imo.
You might as well demote Toop for being my friend, or NVD because I have connections with hi
Hell, you might as well demote all the staff because they have any connection with the player database at all
/s
Why processor? He is good guy, runs YoScroll
is there any evidence of this happening?
No, and if you guys want a serious comment, you have to back up your gossip with actual proof of it, but for now let me tell you that I've upwooted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know. That said. In 7th grade, I took an SAT test without preparing for it at all, it was spur-of-the-moment, I knew about it about an hour ahead of time and didn't do any research or anything. I scored higher on it than the average person using it to apply for college in my area. An IQ test has shown me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test. Master1 is a moderator who graduated from moderator academy. At the age of 15, I understand moderation better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding chatbans. He's not particularly successful as a moderator, but I've met lots of other moderators who aren't as good as me at moderating, so I'm guessing that's not just a result of him being bad at it. I'm also pretty good at programming. I don't have a degree, and other than moderator-only commands I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of programming than any actual programmer, but I have lots of ingenuity for inventing new things. For example, I independently invented temp bans before finding out what they were, and I was only seven or eight years old when I started inventing Yo!Scroll (my first idea being to shift the map by one block on each tick; admittedly not the best plan). I have independently thought of basically every level idea I've come across. Every game mechanism which I've seen in levels by Whatter or EXCrew or FloddyFosh or anyone else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Level making has pretty much gotten trivial for me; I've considered taking a map making course by nou just to see how easy it is. Bots, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike general programming, there's no aspect of bot making which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can remake even the most complex bots by Cyph1e. I'm a good enough map maker that I'm creating a world and so far everybody who's played any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect it to be part of a campaign. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far; people have critiqued it, but not insulted it. I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code. I believe firmly that everybody deserves a future. If we were to find echo playing EE tomorrow, I would be against banning him. In fact, if we had any way of rehabilitating him and knowing that he wasn't just faking it, I'd even support the concept of letting chat freely. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them. I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others. I don't have any issue with any type of smiley whatsoever (short of actually wearing Bruce, Cow, or other smileys which have a harmful effect on others - but I don't care what a person's fantasies consist of, as long as they recognize the difference between reality and fiction and can separate them). I don't have any issue with anybody over what type of aura they use, or aura color they wear, etc. I know that's not really an impressive moral, but it's unfortunately rare; a great many people, especially those my age, are judgmental about these things. I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Jawapa is a <snip>, deserving of zero respect from me, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone. I'm pretty much a pacifist. I've taken an unfair ban without fighting back or seeking retribution, because the guy stopped banning after that. The only time I'll fight back is if 1) the person banning me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back. I've therefore never had a reason to fight back against anyone in anything serious, because my ability to take bans has so far made it so that I'm never in a situation where I'll be worse off after a fight. If I'm not going to get any need for psychiatric hospitalizing after a ban, I really don't care. The only exception is if someone is going after a permaban. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them. I consider myself a feminist. I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. I treat summergirls with the same outlook I treat fanboys and I think that the gender specific smileys should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of EE roleplays continue operating the same way of their own accord. I'm kind of tired of citing these examples and I'm guessing you're getting tired of reading them, if you've even made it this far. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the EE IRC community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. And, uh, I'm a pretty good administrator. All that, and I think your behaviour in this thread was totally stupid. So what do you think, Wicked_woman, now that you at least slightly know me?
girly gladiator wrote:is there any evidence of this happening?
No, and if you guys want a serious comment, you have to back up your gossip with actual proof of it, but for now let me tell you that I've upwooted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know. That said. In 7th grade, I took an SAT test without preparing for it at all, it was spur-of-the-moment, I knew about it about an hour ahead of time and didn't do any research or anything. I scored higher on it than the average person using it to apply for college in my area. An IQ test has shown me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test. Master1 is a moderator who graduated from moderator academy. At the age of 15, I understand moderation better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding chatbans. He's not particularly successful as a moderator, but I've met lots of other moderators who aren't as good as me at moderating, so I'm guessing that's not just a result of him being bad at it. I'm also pretty good at programming. I don't have a degree, and other than moderator-only commands I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of programming than any actual programmer, but I have lots of ingenuity for inventing new things. For example, I independently invented temp bans before finding out what they were, and I was only seven or eight years old when I started inventing Yo!Scroll (my first idea being to shift the map by one block on each tick; admittedly not the best plan). I have independently thought of basically every level idea I've come across. Every game mechanism which I've seen in levels by Whatter or EXCrew or FloddyFosh or anyone else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Level making has pretty much gotten trivial for me; I've considered taking a map making course by nou just to see how easy it is. Bots, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike general programming, there's no aspect of bot making which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can remake even the most complex bots by Cyph1e. I'm a good enough map maker that I'm creating a world and so far everybody who's played any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect it to be part of a campaign. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far; people have critiqued it, but not insulted it. I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code. I believe firmly that everybody deserves a future. If we were to find echo playing EE tomorrow, I would be against banning him. In fact, if we had any way of rehabilitating him and knowing that he wasn't just faking it, I'd even support the concept of letting chat freely. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them. I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others. I don't have any issue with any type of smiley whatsoever (short of actually wearing Bruce, Cow, or other smileys which have a harmful effect on others - but I don't care what a person's fantasies consist of, as long as they recognize the difference between reality and fiction and can separate them). I don't have any issue with anybody over what type of aura they use, or aura color they wear, etc. I know that's not really an impressive moral, but it's unfortunately rare; a great many people, especially those my age, are judgmental about these things. I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Jawapa is a <snip>, deserving of zero respect from me, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone. I'm pretty much a pacifist. I've taken an unfair ban without fighting back or seeking retribution, because the guy stopped banning after that. The only time I'll fight back is if 1) the person banning me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back. I've therefore never had a reason to fight back against anyone in anything serious, because my ability to take bans has so far made it so that I'm never in a situation where I'll be worse off after a fight. If I'm not going to get any need for psychiatric hospitalizing after a ban, I really don't care. The only exception is if someone is going after a permaban. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them. I consider myself a feminist. I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. I treat summergirls with the same outlook I treat fanboys and I think that the gender specific smileys should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of EE roleplays continue operating the same way of their own accord. I'm kind of tired of citing these examples and I'm guessing you're getting tired of reading them, if you've even made it this far. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the EE IRC community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. And, uh, I'm a pretty good administrator. All that, and I think your behaviour in this thread was totally stupid. So what do you think, Wicked_woman, now that you at least slightly know me?
uh what
i dont want new person to mod EE..
girly gladiator wrote:is there any evidence of this happening?
No, and if you guys want a serious comment, you have to back up your gossip with actual proof of it, but for now let me tell you that I've upwooted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know. That said. In 7th grade, I took an SAT test without preparing for it at all, it was spur-of-the-moment, I knew about it about an hour ahead of time and didn't do any research or anything. I scored higher on it than the average person using it to apply for college in my area. An IQ test has shown me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test. Master1 is a moderator who graduated from moderator academy. At the age of 15, I understand moderation better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding chatbans. He's not particularly successful as a moderator, but I've met lots of other moderators who aren't as good as me at moderating, so I'm guessing that's not just a result of him being bad at it. I'm also pretty good at programming. I don't have a degree, and other than moderator-only commands I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of programming than any actual programmer, but I have lots of ingenuity for inventing new things. For example, I independently invented temp bans before finding out what they were, and I was only seven or eight years old when I started inventing Yo!Scroll (my first idea being to shift the map by one block on each tick; admittedly not the best plan). I have independently thought of basically every level idea I've come across. Every game mechanism which I've seen in levels by Whatter or EXCrew or FloddyFosh or anyone else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Level making has pretty much gotten trivial for me; I've considered taking a map making course by nou just to see how easy it is. Bots, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike general programming, there's no aspect of bot making which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can remake even the most complex bots by Cyph1e. I'm a good enough map maker that I'm creating a world and so far everybody who's played any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect it to be part of a campaign. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far; people have critiqued it, but not insulted it. I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code. I believe firmly that everybody deserves a future. If we were to find echo playing EE tomorrow, I would be against banning him. In fact, if we had any way of rehabilitating him and knowing that he wasn't just faking it, I'd even support the concept of letting chat freely. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them. I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others. I don't have any issue with any type of smiley whatsoever (short of actually wearing Bruce, Cow, or other smileys which have a harmful effect on others - but I don't care what a person's fantasies consist of, as long as they recognize the difference between reality and fiction and can separate them). I don't have any issue with anybody over what type of aura they use, or aura color they wear, etc. I know that's not really an impressive moral, but it's unfortunately rare; a great many people, especially those my age, are judgmental about these things. I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Jawapa is a <snip>, deserving of zero respect from me, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone. I'm pretty much a pacifist. I've taken an unfair ban without fighting back or seeking retribution, because the guy stopped banning after that. The only time I'll fight back is if 1) the person banning me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back. I've therefore never had a reason to fight back against anyone in anything serious, because my ability to take bans has so far made it so that I'm never in a situation where I'll be worse off after a fight. If I'm not going to get any need for psychiatric hospitalizing after a ban, I really don't care. The only exception is if someone is going after a permaban. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them. I consider myself a feminist. I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. I treat summergirls with the same outlook I treat fanboys and I think that the gender specific smileys should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of EE roleplays continue operating the same way of their own accord. I'm kind of tired of citing these examples and I'm guessing you're getting tired of reading them, if you've even made it this far. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the EE IRC community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. And, uh, I'm a pretty good administrator. All that, and I think your behaviour in this thread was totally stupid. So what do you think, Wicked_woman, now that you at least slightly know me?
Summary:
1) In 7th grade, He got a score higher than average for not studying on the SAT
2) He took an IQ test, and if it were to go any higher, the test would give an error
3) At 15, he understood more moderation than master 1 because he just graduated moderator academy
4) He's good at programming things, at 7 or 8 he made Yo!Scroll
5) He's thought of every idea
6) He's so good at bot making he can remake a bot by c1phye with ease
7) When he makes maps, everybody expects them to be in a campaign
8) He has good morals
"This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them. I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others."
"I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Jawapa is a <snip>, deserving of zero respect from me, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone. I'm pretty much a pacifist."
9) He'd defend his maturity always
" I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. "
10) He's taken bans and havn't fought back only if
"1) the person banning me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back."
" The only exception is if someone is going after a permaban. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them."
11) HE WANTS TO TAKE AWAY YER ROLEPLAYS! Lol, just kidding, he just doesn't like gender specific smileys, he'd rather not have those in the game.
" I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. I treat summergirls with the same outlook I treat fanboys and I think that the gender specific smileys should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of EE roleplays continue operating the same way of their own accord. "
and now for the "get rekt" line:
So what do you think, Wicked_woman, now that you at least slightly know me?
i r8 8/8 mlg 360 no scope 420 blaze it
EDIT: wow forums, you give me "happy_Hater". This name for sure belongs to wicked_Woman
SadSkeleton wrote:This is a minor problem... Not even a problem.
They are in a relationship, and I would have to argue that just because Zoey gets "special" treatment doesn't mean proc is "abusing" his admin powers. What if NOU, NVD, TOOP, or THANEL had someone close and special to them on EE, they would be doing the same thing processor is doing because that is what being in a relationship does to a person.Yes, we need virgin leaders to represent our game fairly.
well virgins certainly aren't hard to find on this game, so take your pick.
Jawapa is a <snip>,
k
I got an idea, why not demote everybody?
I got an idea, why not demote everybody?
why is it that anon names always relate to the body text in a way
EDIT: boom boom destroy the germans
like 4 people play ee.
WHO CARES?
girly gladiator wrote:is there any evidence of this happening?
No, and if you guys want a serious comment, you have to back up your gossip with actual proof of it, but for now let me tell you that I've upwooted every single person who's disagreed with me here, as far as I know. That said. In 7th grade, I took an SAT test without preparing for it at all, it was spur-of-the-moment, I knew about it about an hour ahead of time and didn't do any research or anything. I scored higher on it than the average person using it to apply for college in my area. An IQ test has shown me to be in the 99.9th percentile for IQ. This is the highest result the test I was given reaches; anything further and they'd consider it to be within the margin of error for that test. Master1 is a moderator who graduated from moderator academy. At the age of 15, I understand moderation better than him, and I owe very little of it to him, as he would rarely give me a decent explanation of anything, just tell me that my ideas were wrong and become aggravated with me for not quite understanding chatbans. He's not particularly successful as a moderator, but I've met lots of other moderators who aren't as good as me at moderating, so I'm guessing that's not just a result of him being bad at it. I'm also pretty good at programming. I don't have a degree, and other than moderator-only commands I don't have a better understanding of any aspect of programming than any actual programmer, but I have lots of ingenuity for inventing new things. For example, I independently invented temp bans before finding out what they were, and I was only seven or eight years old when I started inventing Yo!Scroll (my first idea being to shift the map by one block on each tick; admittedly not the best plan). I have independently thought of basically every level idea I've come across. Every game mechanism which I've seen in levels by Whatter or EXCrew or FloddyFosh or anyone else, the thoughts haven't been new to me. Level making has pretty much gotten trivial for me; I've considered taking a map making course by nou just to see how easy it is. Bots, I actually understand better than people with degrees. Unlike general programming, there's no aspect of bot making which I don't have a very good understanding of. I can remake even the most complex bots by Cyph1e. I'm a good enough map maker that I'm creating a world and so far everybody who's played any of it has said it was really good and plausible to expect it to be part of a campaign. And that's not just, like, me and family members, that counts strangers on the Internet. I've heard zero negative appraisal of it so far; people have critiqued it, but not insulted it. I don't know if that will suffice as evidence that I'm intelligent. I'm done with it, though, because I'd rather defend my maturity, since it's what you've spent the most time attacking. The following are some examples of my morals and ethical code. I believe firmly that everybody deserves a future. If we were to find echo playing EE tomorrow, I would be against banning him. In fact, if we had any way of rehabilitating him and knowing that he wasn't just faking it, I'd even support the concept of letting chat freely. This is essentially because I think that whoever you are in the present is a separate entity from who you were in the past and who you are in the future, and while your present self should take responsibility for your past self's actions, it shouldn't be punished for them simply for the sake of punishment, especially if the present self regrets the actions of the past self and feels genuine guilt about them. I don't believe in judgement of people based on their personal choices as long as those personal choices aren't harming others. I don't have any issue with any type of smiley whatsoever (short of actually wearing Bruce, Cow, or other smileys which have a harmful effect on others - but I don't care what a person's fantasies consist of, as long as they recognize the difference between reality and fiction and can separate them). I don't have any issue with anybody over what type of aura they use, or aura color they wear, etc. I know that's not really an impressive moral, but it's unfortunately rare; a great many people, especially those my age, are judgmental about these things. I love everyone, even people I hate. I wish my worst enemies good fortune and happiness. Jawapa is a <snip>, deserving of zero respect from me, but I wish for him to change for the better and live the best life possible. I wish this for everyone. I'm pretty much a pacifist. I've taken an unfair ban without fighting back or seeking retribution, because the guy stopped banning after that. The only time I'll fight back is if 1) the person banning me shows no signs of stopping and 2) if I don't attack, I'll come out worse than the other person will if I do. In other words, if fighting someone is going to end up being more harmful to them than just letting them go will be to me, I don't fight back. I've therefore never had a reason to fight back against anyone in anything serious, because my ability to take bans has so far made it so that I'm never in a situation where I'll be worse off after a fight. If I'm not going to get any need for psychiatric hospitalizing after a ban, I really don't care. The only exception is if someone is going after a permaban. Even then, I'll do the minimum amount of harm to them that I possibly can in protecting myself. If someone points a gun at me and I can get out of it without harming them, I'd prefer to do that over killing them. I consider myself a feminist. I don't believe in enforced or uniform gender roles; they may happen naturally, but they should never be coerced into happening unnaturally. I treat summergirls with the same outlook I treat fanboys and I think that the gender specific smileys should really go, even if it'll turn out that the majority of EE roleplays continue operating the same way of their own accord. I'm kind of tired of citing these examples and I'm guessing you're getting tired of reading them, if you've even made it this far. In closing, the people who know me in real life all respect me, as do a great many people in the EE IRC community, where I spend most of my time and where I'm pretty known for being helpful around the community. A lot of people in my segment of the community are depressed or going through hard times, and I spend a lot of time giving advice and support to people there. And, uh, I'm a pretty good administrator. All that, and I think your behaviour in this thread was totally stupid. So what do you think, Wicked_woman, now that you at least slightly know me?
underrated post right here, take my upwoot good sir/madam!
Tbh is more like a developer than an administrator.
this is a dumb troll topic screw it guys just go here ---> http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?id=36719
Pages: 1
Topic closed
[ Started around 1745227931.5811 - Generated in 0.222 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.79 MiB (Peak: 2.07 MiB) ]