Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
The only sane option to do at this point is vote for an independent if you vote at all. But since only Trump and Clinton are getting news coverage its practically impossible for an independent to even have the slightest chance of winning.
Offline
Hi I have a question for all of you:
So the debates are coming up soon-ish and they are pretty hyped up and for good reason. Anyways, if you were moderating the debates, what questions would you ask Trump? What about Clinton? Maybe even Johnson if he does well enough in the polls?
aka towwl
Offline
Offline
Where did you get that GIF from Gosha?
Leader of The Rabbit Squad | Managed to annoy an entire IRC for the lols. They went salty and banned me for a ridiculous time and now they want to ban me from EE itself. Learn to not be so salty peeps
The Rabbit Games Progress: 100%
Offline
From night show with jimmy fallon
Offline
Don't forget the 3rd parties.
Pm me with anything math related please
Offline
Don't forget the 3rd parties.
jill stein is crazy
Offline
Emma333 wrote:Don't forget the 3rd parties.
jill stein is crazy
Explain pls
Pm me with anything math related please
Offline
Here's a list of all of the bad parts of Jill Stein's policies.
just kidding but many of these are bad, and the ones that aren't directly bad are often vague and nonspecific
Offline
Here's a list of all of the bad parts of Jill Stein's policies.
just kidding but many of these are bad, and the ones that aren't directly bad are often vague and nonspecific
Are there any responses listed anywhere on that website to the possible bad things that may happen because of her policies?
Offline
I would be quite surprised if there were.
Offline
On TV they said "duh... Trump is right about NYC, duh... Clinton, shush woman ! we need to build a wall"
So did Trump is right sometimes ? and did you listen the radio at 6 am ? Clinton, i do not like it, she too incompetent..
Offline
On TV they said "duh... Trump is right about NYC, duh... Clinton, shush woman ! we need to build a wall"
So did Trump is right sometimes ? and did you listen the radio at 6 am ? Clinton, i do not like it, she too incompetent..
Top ranking scientists still cannot deduce the meaning behind this post.
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
On TV they said "duh... Trump is right about NYC, duh... Clinton, shush woman ! we need to build a wall"
So did Trump is right sometimes ? and did you listen the radio at 6 am ? Clinton, i do not like it, she too incompetent..
Me three Clinton ahaha has a dockery doodle doo and the news? A wall! XD
yea
For those who watched the debate, who do you think won(regardless of whether you hate one or both)?
Offline
Hillary hilariously whipped Trump like a **** in that debate
I love Trump but goddamn she roasted him so goddamn hard I felt bad for the guy
Maverick: Started up on a 6, when he pulled from the clouds, and then I moved in above him.
Charlie: Well, if you were directly above him, how could you see him?
Maverick: Because I was inverted.
Offline
I died
I do say Hillary Clinton won debate.
That's all.
Offline
Trump kept rambling and talking in circles. But, he did have a few good punches.
Hillary is just a mess. She spent most of the debate with an uncomfortable smile on her face.
I was a little surprised to see Trump not act extremely aggressive towards Hillary. Even asked if it was okay to address her a certain way.
I don't think either of them won the debate... not much was even debated. Hillary kept attacking Trump, and Trump kept defending himself.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
The irony of the entire debate is that despite Trump's attempts to paint clinton as lacking the physical stamina necesarry to be a president, it turned out to be him left huffing, puffing, and red faced at the end of a sustained 50-minute *** whooping. He was just winging it. Lying, making up crap on crap, it was painful to watch.
If he can't find the physical and mental fortitude to make it through a 95-minute debate where presumably half of the audience was on his side, how is he going to stand in front of what will most certainly be a hostile Congress, or sitting across the table from any number of foreign leaders he will invariably **** off with his decidedly obnoxious Trumpiness?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
Lying,
You mean like Hillary's lies through her entire campaign?
making up crap on crap
Occasionally, she's had people making up the crap for her (ear pieces).
huffing, puffing,
Must have pneumonia... oh wait...
If he can't find the physical and mental fortitude to make it through a 95-minute debate where presumably half of the audience was on his side,
I don't understand how getting red faced, if he did, is a sure sign he shouldn't be president.
what will most certainly be a hostile Congress,
Most of the congress is Republican.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
You mean like Hillary's lies through her entire campaign?
Trump has lied at a (conservative) rate of 4:1 compared to Hillary. She is held to a different standard because she is a woman.
Most of the congress is Republican.
Just because they are Republican doesn't mean they endorse Trump. Doesn't a sizable chunk of the GOP already vocally endorse Hillary over their own candidate?
I don't understand how getting red faced, if he did, is a sure sign he shouldn't be president.
It's quite a fall of grace from the over-confident douche personality he shows off in his rallies that draw overwhelmingly white crowds. Only thing they don't bring to the rallies is the white sheet. Are you not aware that Trump has implied that he would consider using nukes, increase military spending, kill the families of terrorists, steal the resources of invaded countries, etc., or do you just not care? He also seems to idolize that peace-loving hippie Putin.
I bet you're going to use that weak excuse of Trump's lack of actual policy-making experience to absolve him while doing the opposite for Clinton. If Trump is actually serious about his claims, he would be worse than Clinton. If he's not (and I think this might be the case), he'll leave the warmongering decisions to his establishment Republicans advisors. We all know what a bunch of tree huggers they are too, right?
★ ☆ ★ ☆ ★
☆ ★ ★
Offline
MrJaWapa wrote:You mean like Hillary's lies through her entire campaign?
Trump has lied at a (conservative) rate of 4:1 compared to Hillary. She is held to a different standard because she is a woman.
Oh wow I've never heard that one before. I'm not acknowledging any other points than this one, but this is complete bs. Trump is held to standards by the liberals, Hillary is held to standards by the conservatives. It doesn't matter if she's a woman or not, they both lie. According to your "4/1" failed statistic that you pulled out of the sky, a fact check was run after the debate and SUPPOSEDLY, EACH candidate mostly lied or fully lied about 50%-75% of what they said. They both lie, they are both corrupt. Gender is not involved.
Offline
Trump has lied at a (conservative) rate of 4:1 compared to Hillary.
73.6% of all stats are made up.
She is held to a different standard because she is a woman.
Not when it comes to lying.
She's held to a different standard because she's a rich democrat running for president (Ex: Emails and lying under oath)
Just because they are Republican doesn't mean they endorse Trump. Doesn't a sizable chunk of the GOP already vocally endorse Hillary over their own candidate?
If by sizable you mean anyone connected to George Bush, then yes... kinda. I'm pretty sure there are very few who support Hillary being in office. They just don't like Trump being the republican nominee.
The republicans he ran against said nasty things about him, because they wanted to beat him. Same thing happened with Obama/Hillary. Obama said he didn't think Hillary was fit to be president. He's out of terms, and now he's all for Hillary being president.
It's quite a fall of grace from the over-confident douche personality he shows off
Or... maybe he was irritated? He was attacked for 90 minutes. That would agitate nearly everyone.
that draw overwhelmingly white crowds.
Why did you even mention this? Why is that relevant?
Are you not aware that Trump has implied that he would consider using nukes, increase military spending, kill the families of terrorists, steal the resources of invaded countries, etc., or do you just not care?
Are you not aware that he can't do any of that without consent from Congress?
Are you also not aware that Hillary let some of troops die, and risked nation security?
Why is increased military spending an issue?
Also, How is this relevant to him being mad?
He also seems to idolize that peace-loving hippie Putin.
He wants to make the U.S. allies with Russia.
I bet you're going to use that weak excuse of Trump's lack of actual policy-making experience to absolve him while doing the opposite for Clinton.
No, I wasn't going to say that at all. If you're running for president, you should have your **** together... or at least not be Gary Johnson.
a bunch of tree huggers they are too, right?
Are you in favor of ISIS?
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
[ Started around 1732842519.6051 - Generated in 0.294 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.76 MiB (Peak: 2.01 MiB) ]