What I've been doing lately

realmaster42 · 2016-09-12 10:04:03

This will never go public and I ain't risking getting banned, but this is what I've been doing lately.

▼Why

MartenM · 2016-09-12 10:34:39

So you have made an EE clone?

Jabatheblob1 · 2016-09-12 10:49:09

What i've been doing in the meantime isn't forum appropriate so i'll just stay in the shadows.

realmaster42 · 2016-09-12 12:10:50

MartenM wrote:

So you have made an EE clone?

Yeah... Kinda

dylantherabbit · 2016-09-12 12:14:52

marcoantonimsantos wrote:

MartenM wrote:
So you have made an EE clone?
Yeah... Kinda

Oh, I was wondering what was so special with it! Nice work, could we play it sometime if it has anything interesting to it?

The Party Animal · 2016-09-12 12:42:53

dylantherabbit wrote:

marcoantonimsantos wrote:
MartenM wrote:
So you have made an EE clone?
Yeah... Kinda
Oh, I was wondering what was so special with it! Nice work, could we play it sometime if it has anything interesting to it?

he says you have to be trusted for some reason

realmaster42 · 2016-09-12 13:53:16

The Party Animal wrote:

dylantherabbit wrote:
marcoantonimsantos wrote:
MartenM wrote:
So you have made an EE clone?
Yeah... Kinda
Oh, I was wondering what was so special with it! Nice work, could we play it sometime if it has anything interesting to it?
he says you have to be trusted for some reason

I can trust dylan He doesn't look like he will share it to everyone
I only give link to trusted people because I don't want anyone spreading it... Otherwhise: ban

Anyways PM me for a time and I'll give you a separate link

Blackmask · 2016-09-12 18:20:43

Interesting ! If you think I am trustworthy i would like play on it :p IGN : Darkitnow

Zumza · 2016-09-12 20:02:54

Theres no difference between sending the link one by one than making it public.

Xfrogman43

Xfrogman43 · 2016-09-12 22:11:52

Zumza wrote:

Theres no difference between sending the link one by one than making it public.

^
Someone you give it to is bound to share with their friends, and then those friends give it to their friends and so on.

realmaster42 · 2016-09-12 22:54:11

Zumza wrote:

Theres no difference between sending the link one by one than making it public.

Xfrogman43 wrote:

Zumza wrote:
Theres no difference between sending the link one by one than making it public.
^
Someone you give it to is bound to share with their friends, and then those friends give it to their friends and so on.

I'm not sharing it to everyone xD
It's sad how people want it public hardly...

Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.
I'm not taking any chances

And no this will never go public

Xfrogman43 · 2016-09-12 23:17:01

marcoantonimsantos wrote:

Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.

Just don't give it to anybody. The person, if smart enough to read this post can give the link to someone else before telling you they got it and can delete it.

hummerz5 · 2016-09-12 23:24:40

marcoantonimsantos wrote:

Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.

IIRC it's like a theory in computer science where you can't actually make the user's computer do something without that computer being able to record the instructions (download the .swf)

That being said, I might be just confusing the Locard principle.

Zumza · 2016-09-13 12:11:22

marcoantonimsantos wrote:

Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.
I'm not taking any chances
And no this will never go public

Good luck trying to hide the root link.
Even an inexperienced user can open a web inspection tool.
Or if you're using a PlayerIO "tiny loader" not even that will prohibit users from getting the real link. As if you decompile it you get the link on sight...

realmaster42 · 2016-09-13 15:52:44

Zumza wrote:

marcoantonimsantos wrote:
Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.
I'm not taking any chances
And no this will never go public
Good luck trying to hide the root link.
Even an inexperienced user can open a web inspection tool.
Or if you're using a PlayerIO "tiny loader" not even that will prohibit users from getting the real link. As if you decompile it you get the link on sight...

Argh the SWF is the same as the EE's swf, but the server source code is different.

Blackmask · 2016-09-13 16:04:01

ok no problem

Zumza · 2016-09-13 16:05:47

marcoantonimsantos wrote:

Zumza wrote:
marcoantonimsantos wrote:
Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.
I'm not taking any chances
And no this will never go public
Good luck trying to hide the root link.
Even an inexperienced user can open a web inspection tool.
Or if you're using a PlayerIO "tiny loader" not even that will prohibit users from getting the real link. As if you decompile it you get the link on sight...
Argh the SWF is the same as the EE's wf, but the server source code is different.

What i meant was that when you share a pseudo-link the user who gets it may discover where your main file is hosted. And if somebody shares that main link you won't be able to trackback the one who did it. And supposedly if the other links point to the same main file, you would have to change all of the other links in order to undo the effect.

realmaster42

realmaster42 · 2016-09-13 16:06:57

Zumza wrote:

marcoantonimsantos wrote:
Zumza wrote:
marcoantonimsantos wrote:
Plus I didn't give anyone the link yet, and if I ever do so it'll be a separate link that can get deleted at anytime.
I'm not taking any chances
And no this will never go public
Good luck trying to hide the root link.
Even an inexperienced user can open a web inspection tool.
Or if you're using a PlayerIO "tiny loader" not even that will prohibit users from getting the real link. As if you decompile it you get the link on sight...
Argh the SWF is the same as the EE's wf, but the server source code is different.
What i meant was that when you share a pseudo-link the user who gets it may discover where your main file is hosted. And if somebody shares that main link you won't be able to trackback the one who did it. And supposedly if the other links point to the same main file, you would have to change all of them too in order to undo the effect.

Ohhhh... I'll think about that

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#1 2016-09-12 10:04:03

What I've been doing lately

#2 2016-09-12 10:34:39

Re: What I've been doing lately

#3 2016-09-12 10:49:09

Re: What I've been doing lately

#4 2016-09-12 12:10:50

Re: What I've been doing lately

#5 2016-09-12 12:14:52

Re: What I've been doing lately

#6 2016-09-12 12:42:53

Re: What I've been doing lately

#7 2016-09-12 13:53:16

Re: What I've been doing lately

#8 2016-09-12 18:20:43, last edited by Blackmask (2016-09-12 18:25:07)

Re: What I've been doing lately

#9 2016-09-12 20:02:54, last edited by Zumza (2016-09-12 20:03:11)

Re: What I've been doing lately

#10 2016-09-12 22:11:52

Re: What I've been doing lately

#11 2016-09-12 22:54:11

Re: What I've been doing lately

#12 2016-09-12 23:17:01

Re: What I've been doing lately

#13 2016-09-12 23:24:40

Re: What I've been doing lately

#14 2016-09-13 12:11:22, last edited by Zumza (2016-09-13 12:11:58)

Re: What I've been doing lately

#15 2016-09-13 15:52:44

Re: What I've been doing lately

#16 2016-09-13 16:04:01

Re: What I've been doing lately

#17 2016-09-13 16:05:47, last edited by Zumza (2016-09-13 16:06:39)

Re: What I've been doing lately

#18 2016-09-13 16:06:57

Re: What I've been doing lately

Board footer