Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
HEARTS [1/99]
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Offline
24244928
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
Offline
92F8D5
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
An example of which idea "being bad"?
The current system - since you seem so opposed to fixing it
The invisible edit idea has no noticeable downside (to me) in your example.
"While it is, it's not implemented yet so"
Your proposed idea doesn't even consider any action until another post is made, so again I am confused. (Especially since that topic was deleted entirely, no?)
If designed so the same thing would happen to topics posted in the same subforum
IF you're referring to the "deleted content comes back from the grave" scenario, I completely object to that aspect. In no sense is it reasonable for the delete button to retroactively return content that was previously thought to be eradicated. Even less so would be if this deleted content could not be edited. That would, in effect, make the delete function actually make content permanent.
Someone suggested that one as a joke in IRC
suddenly random sig change
Offline
---
Offline
Oh Wonder – Lose It
Offline
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
Offline
Offline
no please stop right there theres like possibly thousands or millions of other people who have experienced the situation and you're not the only one with that stand so stop wallowing in your "i want to feel special" hole and accept reality as it is please stop with these kinds of comments thank you
lunchbox
Offline
Offline
Offline
[ Started around 1732540854.3657 - Generated in 0.125 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.09 MiB) ]