Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
that's not a bug.
proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂ ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?
Offline
Offline
Yeah you also can't woot private messages (even though I've tried to out of habit). It'd be kinda useless since only the users in the PM would be able to see it.
Offline
Offline
i asked about woots for private messages before and everybody told me it shouldnt be poss to woot pms but i still think we should be able to i also think it should be poss to rep pms
yeah thatd actually be pretty cool to woot pms because if we could woot pms and our pms were with more than 1 person we could woot pms and itd be cool bc everyone would see the woot for the pm that we made when we wooted pms so i think that if wooting pms is a good idea then repping would be a good idea because repping is similar to wooting pms except its repping pms not wooting pms i think we should rep pms woot this pm if you agree
Offline
Yeah you also can't woot private messages (even though I've tried to out of habit). It'd be kinda useless since only the users in the PM would be able to see it.
Still as a show of appreciation.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Offline
if we did have private message woots, I'd argue for them not to be a part of the 20?/day limit, as they aren't public and abusing them is ridiculous.
Time to stay faithful to my origins and woot all new messages I get just to mess with people!
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738436113.4849 - Generated in 0.131 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.51 MiB (Peak: 1.68 MiB) ]