Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Moved to Forum Discussion.
It's the new rep system. If you want to turn it off, there's an option for that in Profile>Display.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Moved to Forum Discussion.
It's the new rep system. If you want to turn it off, there's an option for that in Profile>Display.
I'm like you. I have -5, and you -13. Are you sure you even wanted to update the forums to this? See, how cruel the players got today, why shall we live in black times.
\s
Different55 wrote:Moved to Forum Discussion.
It's the new rep system. If you want to turn it off, there's an option for that in Profile>Display.
I'm like you. I have -5, and you -13. Are you sure you even wanted to update the forums to this? See, how cruel the players got today, why shall we live in black times.
\s
its actually /s
Offline
AnatolyEE wrote:Different55 wrote:Moved to Forum Discussion.
It's the new rep system. If you want to turn it off, there's an option for that in Profile>Display.
I'm like you. I have -5, and you -13. Are you sure you even wanted to update the forums to this? See, how cruel the players got today, why shall we live in black times.
\sits actually /s
Your not the president of short cuts!
maxi123 wrote:AnatolyEE wrote:Different55 wrote:Moved to Forum Discussion.
It's the new rep system. If you want to turn it off, there's an option for that in Profile>Display.
I'm like you. I have -5, and you -13. Are you sure you even wanted to update the forums to this? See, how cruel the players got today, why shall we live in black times.
\sits actually /s
Your not the president of short cuts!
oh snAP
Offline
When an administrator adds a controversial feature just to shame a person for their opinions on nuts, and that administrator becomes a victim of that feature, you know justice is served. Except for the fact that I still have Number1LowestReputation just because four/five people disagree with my opinion on nuts but whatever
Offline
When an administrator adds a controversial feature just to shame a person for their opinions on nuts, and that administrator becomes a victim of that feature, you know justice is served.
is that irony
im having a hard time understanding how irony works
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1738447544.1805 - Generated in 0.068 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.54 MiB (Peak: 1.71 MiB) ]