Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
That's it. I've seen too much on this forum and I'm going to post about it here.
Cyber-Bullying is bullying, but virtually (online).
Cyber-Bullying can depress people, especially if they suffer any mental disee.
What I've seen so far on a topic about a poor autistic person getting banned for no reasson at all, is too much.
Cyber-Bullying is serious bussiness, and not something to joke about.
Our 'friends' imgood9, Emalton and Luka504 are cyber-bullying Rez75, who got banned for no reasson.
>implying your entire life revolves around a dying flash game played by 100 people
>being this dramatic
Suprisingly, Emalton wooted this post.
This is joking with the OP (Rez75), who is autistic.
Pls, this is not a thing to do, neither IRL or in the forums.
Then we have luka504, who did a long review for **** reassons.
If you issue any cyber-bullying, post it here.
Anyways, here is the link to the topic:
http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewtopic.php?id=35736
Woot posts about people who are agaisnt cyber-bullying, like Kefka or me, and others too, to support NO CYBER-BULLYING.
Offline
http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 51#p614951
...just yesterday you disagreed with a ban that involved insulting someone...Then said a guideline (inside a 'rules' link) didn't apply because it wasn't an actual rule (which if you looked, there was a rule farther down the page). I try not to point out hypocrisy because it happens a lot anywhere, but I mean cmon.
Offline
all i see is you trying to whiteknight while saying hate speech against people, isnt that cyber bullying too? youre fighting fire with fire
Woot posts about people who are agaisnt cyber-bullying, like Kefka or me, and others too, to support NO CYBER-BULLYING.
1 woot = 1 cyber bully gone
/s
also do you think rez75 is actually comfortable with all of this attention pointed towards him
Offline
^it might be hipocrisy but not as blatant as you say. He's calling for more of s community reformation than a crackdown on rules; I might want people to call me 1337 hax0r supreme, but I don't want them banned for noncompliance.
Offline
^it might be hipocrisy but not as blatant as you say. He's calling for more of s community reformation than a crackdown on rules; I might want people to call me 1337 hax0r supreme, but I don't want them banned for noncompliance.
ha ninjad amirite
1 SECOND NINJA REKTTTTTTTTTT
Offline
hummerz5 wrote:^it might be hipocrisy but not as blatant as you say. He's calling for more of s community reformation than a crackdown on rules; I might want people to call me 1337 hax0r supreme, but I don't want them banned for noncompliance.
ha ninjad amirite
1 SECOND NINJA REKTTTTTTTTTT
... Don't be mean about it :'(.
Offline
Wow that post i made got a lot of backfire.
I never tried to cyber bully anyone, i didnt even think the post i made was that bad.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
Wow that post i made got a lot of backfire.
I never tried to cyber bully anyone, i didnt even think the post i made was that bad.
Like I said to Zoey once, abusers never see themselves as the bad guy, and never see the damage that they do. /s
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
cfyberbullying isnt real
just turn off monitor lmao ~
Offline
Jesus Christ this is a huge trainwreck
Offline
Offline
Cyber bullying usually goes into what someone is bullied about IRL, cyber bullying is 100% real because it is identical to verbal bullying.
As someone who used to be at least a foot taller than everyone I was never physically bullied but verbally I was, on a scale of bullying it wasn't that bad but when someone said something alike online I felt a deep awful connection - to those who have been severely bullied, cyber bullying is like reliving the awful memories.
You cannot simply walk away without it affecting you; if I were to bully you about something that people have not said IRL to you then it wouldn't be as bad and you could brush it off unless you see it in yourself.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
oh. my god.
oh my god
What I've seen so far on a topic about a poor autistic person getting banned for no reasson at all, is too much.
Emalton and Luka504 are cyber-bullying Rez75
you. how wh
i have no words. i'm in shock. i've been in shock for the last half hour and this is the icing on the cake.
you. YOU. MADE A TOPIC. ABOUT CYBER-BULLYING. AFTER CYBERBULLYING SOMEONE WORSE THAN LUKA OR EMALTON DID.
Luka's reply was out of line but holy CRAP you went above and beyond "out of the line" if the line was the moon you'd be in andromeda
oh my god
you can't just say "wow cyberbullying is bad" when you LITERALLY TOLD SOMEONE TO KILL THEMSELVES. TWICE.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
"Our ret@rded Luka504"
"a ret@rded named Luka504"
"If you think that is helping the community pls kill yourself right now"
"Die IRL and quick pls you screwd up other peoples life already"
YOU SAID THAT. YOU LITERALLY SAID THAT.
you can't say "cyberbullying is bad" and write an entire post flaming someone for what they said.
i can't even. jesus
proc's discorb stylish themes for forums/the game
꧁꧂L O V E & C O R N꧁꧂ ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
danke bluecloud thank u raphe [this section of my sig is dedicated to everything i've loved that's ever died]
?
Offline
People don't take this seriously.
discord: sciallasemper
Offline
you can't say "cyberbullying is bad" and write an entire post flaming someone for what they said.
Yes he can, and he did.
...just yesterday you disagreed with a ban that involved insulting someone...Then said a guideline (inside a 'rules' link) didn't apply because it wasn't an actual rule (which if you looked, there was a rule farther down the page). I try not to point out hypocrisy because it happens a lot anywhere, but I mean cmon.
You and Zoey are just dismissing his arguments by attacking him because his previous actions. Just because marco has done bad things in the past doesn't mean his points are invalid. He raises very valid points that are up for discussion. Please people, your ignorance is almost as bad as what luka and marco did the other day.
People don't take this seriously.
...
I have never thought of programming for reputation and honor. What I have in my heart must come out. That is the reason why I code.
Offline
rgl32 wrote:...just yesterday you disagreed with a ban that involved insulting someone...Then said a guideline (inside a 'rules' link) didn't apply because it wasn't an actual rule (which if you looked, there was a rule farther down the page). I try not to point out hypocrisy because it happens a lot anywhere, but I mean cmon.
You and Zoey are just dismissing his arguments by attacking him because his previous actions. Just because marco has done bad things in the past doesn't mean his points are invalid. He raises very valid points that are up for discussion. Please people, your ignorance is almost as bad as what luka and marco did the other day.
The main issue I have with the post in general is he pointed out certain people in his post. It seems just like a way to point out other people to cause hate. If he actually had good intentions to do this, then you wouldn't isolate certain people which could easily just creates hostility in the thread. It's also a bit weird to me about how he used the most vulnerable thread to write the topic about. You never know the mental state of any one that makes a post, so any sort of harassment shouldn't be accepted, but this post was only made because it was not under any doubt, but I do suppose context is everything anyway. I did not make my post because of the points he made, I made it because of the intentions that I think he had.
Offline
Pages: 1
[ Started around 1739058466.9279 - Generated in 0.109 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.76 MiB (Peak: 2 MiB) ]