Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Should probably have made a post about this.
Forums have been upgraded to the latest version of FluxBB. That's what the majority of time spent uprgading was doing. Since the forums are so heavily modified I had to apply the patches instead of just replacing all the forum files, and this is my first time patching anything. While I was at it I also upgraded all the software on the server.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Should probably have made a post about this.
Forums have been upgraded to the latest version of FluxBB. That's what the majority of time spent uprgading was doing. Since the forums are so heavily modified I had to apply the patches instead of just replacing all the forum files, and this is my first time patching anything. While I was at it I also upgraded all the software on the server.
Yeah, I noticed all of the new features.
(also pls bring the online users at the footer back pls )
Yeah, I noticed all of the new features.
This is more of a security update than a feature update. Security is important too, we don't want random scrubs being able to take control of the forums.
(also pls bring the online users at the footer back pls )
Dude it's been back for a while now.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
new PM system when
aka towwl
Offline
new PM system when
In 5 years
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Offline
What's wrong with the current PM system?
Offline
Offline
Alright rep is added. For any more suggestions on rep see here
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Alright rep is added. For any more suggestions on rep see here
is it a bug that theres no number between + and -
also because of the amount of cancer on these forums people will abuse the rep system as much as possible gg
Offline
Different55 wrote:Alright rep is added. For any more suggestions on rep see here
is it a bug that theres no number between + and -
also because of the amount of cancer on these forums people will abuse the rep system as much as possible gg
diff already has a -6 reputation
Offline
There's now an option to hide the total from being displayed on every post while still being able to send and receive rep instead of it being hidden globally. Also a small display bug in the profile is fixed.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
Looks like drama is back on the menu, boys!
Offline
oh yes
another way to make people feel bad about themselves
Offline
when you put an apostrophe in the dumb rep reasons it's preceded by a backslash after it's submitted
Offline
ernesdo whats with ur rep
http://image.prntscr.com/image/8919e5a5 … 8b1d70.png
That's what happens when you choose not to display your rep total on every post. It's still totally visible for anyone who goes on your rep page and adds it up, but a lot of people got butthurt about rep on the old forums because of it. Like how if you have 2000 posts, people see you as more trustworthy than someone with 40 posts. Post count doesn't actually mean much but people still read into it and so people still get butthurt over it.
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
it begins
aka towwl
Offline
maxi123 wrote:ernesdo whats with ur rep
http://image.prntscr.com/image/8919e5a5 … 8b1d70.pngThat's what happens when you choose not to display your rep total on every post. It's still totally visible for anyone who goes on your rep page and adds it up, but a lot of people got butthurt about rep on the old forums because of it. Like how if you have 2000 posts, people see you as more trustworthy than someone with 40 posts. Post count doesn't actually mean much but people still read into it and so people still get butthurt over it.
But if they see someone with 5000 posts and 5 rep then they would be less trustworthy than someone who has 100 posts and 5 rep - reps need to be diluted to represent posts before rep.
Thank you eleizibeth ^
I stack my signatures rather than delete them so I don't lose them
Offline
Different55 wrote:maxi123 wrote:ernesdo whats with ur rep
http://image.prntscr.com/image/8919e5a5 … 8b1d70.pngThat's what happens when you choose not to display your rep total on every post. It's still totally visible for anyone who goes on your rep page and adds it up, but a lot of people got butthurt about rep on the old forums because of it. Like how if you have 2000 posts, people see you as more trustworthy than someone with 40 posts. Post count doesn't actually mean much but people still read into it and so people still get butthurt over it.
But if they see someone with 5000 posts and 5 rep then they would be less trustworthy than someone who has 100 posts and 5 rep - reps need to be diluted to represent posts before rep.
Judging trustworthiness based on numbers is bad, do we really want to be adding features that would accommodate and encourage the people who do that?
"Sometimes failing a leap of faith is better than inching forward"
- ShinsukeIto
Offline
[ Started around 1732231300.3306 - Generated in 0.310 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.08 MiB) ]