Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

mrjawapa · 2016-06-07 07:44:25

Luka, please. Go back, reread.

The only thing Kirby has done so far that looks guilty is vote for me early on.

Kuba has done that, and seems to be trying to avoid attention by not posting. They can still defend themselves before the day is over... that's what we're waiting on.

Different55 · 2016-06-07 07:48:05

Luka504 wrote:

Oh god i worded that post wrong.
You people are giving Kirby a free ride beacuse he keeps saying how new to the game he is.
Yet you keep accusing Kuba for ,,lurking,, which by itself doesnt mean much.
YET KIRBY has 10 posts himself, none of which dont even help the town in any way, aka lurking as well.
How on earth is this fair?

He's not in any way getting a free ride. Look back at the topic. We're primarily discussing lynching 2 people. One of those is kuba, and he seems like he's going to get lynched unless he does something quick to take suspicion off of himself (@kuba, please see my previous post directed at you). The other person is kirby (@kirby if you could check out the same post that'd be great). Both people have been not playing very well, and have not really contributed to the game. We're (well, I am, anyway) going after kuba because he has done only the absolute bare minimum to just stay in this game at all.

It's not unfair. Strictly between the two of them, it's the only sane choice. If you think Kirby is more suspicious or that Kuba is innocent, then please, explain.

Luka504 · 2016-06-07 08:10:09

And I actually find this change of heart incredibly suspicious. D1 you said nothing about absolutely requiring hard proof to vote for bimps. He turned out to be town. But today we go after kuba for not participating AT ALL and suddenly you require proof? Yeah, that's not shady at all. Why the double standard? What makes kuba special?

Oh but i had proof yesterday. The fact he turned out a townie is just...... His dumb play tactic i guess.
Proof 1: His change in behavior.
Bimps himself was really pushing a lynch on Jawapa. If you watched game 7, he lynched me, no prob. He was a mafia.
In game 8, he straight up stood against the majority and trusted Jawapa to not be evil. He was innocent.
Here he seems to want to lynch someone just beacuse ,,Why not,,.
Its a lot like game 7 which, let me remind you, HE WAS A MAFIA.
Proof 2: Refusing to read his rolecard.
This by itself doesnt really mean much. But its still just..... Not right.
Proof 3: Being VERY aggresive.
Seriously though. He was being very aggresive, especaly towards Jawapa. He didnt even give out any reasons to lynching jawapa, except for him being a jerk. Thats it.
His disguise? ,,Hur hur i didnt read ma rolecard so anything goes for me,, .
Well fun fact: I havent read my rolecard either. So that means you cant lynch me Different :>.
Also when people started voting him up, he claimed citizen.
Thats great n all. But mafias can just claim citzen freely since none of us here know how many regular citizens there are.
And with a Sheriff who only has ONE investigation, the chance youre gonna find the 2-3 mafia is pretty low.
Oh but we also have a Serial Killer here. So we have 3-4 baddies, maybe more!

What do you have on Kuba currently?
He lurks.
Sureeeeeeeeeeee.

Different55 · 2016-06-07 08:31:55

Luka504 wrote:

And I actually find this change of heart incredibly suspicious. D1 you said nothing about absolutely requiring hard proof to vote for bimps. He turned out to be town. But today we go after kuba for not participating AT ALL and suddenly you require proof? Yeah, that's not shady at all. Why the double standard? What makes kuba special?
Oh but i had proof yesterday.

Oh so when you're suspicious of someone it's proof but when anyone else is suspicious of someone then it's absolutely nothing. Got it, cool.

Proof 1: His change in behavior.

I didn't watch game 7. I meant to, but I lost track of posts and just kind of dropped it. I kept up with game 8 tho. And as far as I can tell he was acting the same way here as in game 8.

In game 8, he straight up stood against the majority and trusted Jawapa to not be evil. He was innocent.
Here he seems to want to lynch someone just beacuse ,,Why not,,.

Literally what is your point? He was a citizen, not mafia. Are you seriously trying to make the case that he was mafia after he's dead and in the ground? What the heck? He was innocent both games, if there's a change in behavior from one game to another it's obviously not because he was mafia. I gotta tell you man, you are making 0 sense.

Proof 2: Refusing to read his rolecard.
This by itself doesnt really mean much. But its still just..... Not right.

He did the same thing last game, so what?

Proof 3: Being VERY aggresive.
Seriously though. He was being very aggresive, especaly towards Jawapa. He didnt even give out any reasons to lynching jawapa, except for him being a jerk. Thats it.

It was D1 and the day had just started. Like I said in my last post, simply not lynching anyone because of lack of information is a bad choice. I don't know whether that was bimps thinking or whether he was just being his usual tardly self but there you go.

His disguise? ,,Hur hur i didnt read ma rolecard so anything goes for me,, .
Well fun fact: I havent read my rolecard either. So that means you cant lynch me Different :>.
Also when people started voting him up, he claimed citizen.
Thats great n all. But mafias can just claim citzen freely since none of us here know how many regular citizens there are.

Okay but he was actually a citizen? He died and we all saw his role. What in the world are you on?

And with a Sheriff who only has ONE investigation, the chance youre gonna find the 2-3 mafia is pretty low.

So? I already said that even if our sheriff wasn't a one shot wonder, we would have no guarantee. That was my whole point. There's no guarantee of finding anything. The only guarantee a sheriff can get is if someone comes back guilty, and he didn't get a guilty result back so we have no idea. There will never be proof of innocence in this game, so your insistence of having proof for kuba is ridiculous.

Oh but we also have a Serial Killer here. So we have 3-4 baddies, maybe more!

Woah woah woah, how do you know there's a serial killer? There were 2 kills last night, one from marco and one from the mafia. Unless the mafia got roleblocked, in which case yeah there's another killer. But either way, how would you know?

What do you have on Kuba currently?
He lurks.
Sureeeeeeeeeeee.

Oh yeah, "he lurks", that's it, just a bit of lurking.

No, he's contrbuted nothing to this game. He's done nothing. He's said nothing. But you are absolutely determined that we must have PROOF of his innocence despite that being impossible, and you totally ignore me asking why you were defending him. What reason do you have to believe kuba is innocent?

Well, I think that's it for me tonight. See you guys tomorrow. Had a super active day of mafia today but I'll be less active tomorrow. Not inactive, just less active.

Luka504 · 2016-06-07 10:25:51

Different55 wrote:

Woah woah woah, how do you know there's a serial killer? There were 2 kills last night, one from marco and one from the mafia. Unless the mafia got roleblocked, in which case yeah there's another killer. But either way, how would you know?

Who needs to read theories anyways.

Luka504 wrote:

Ok after reading this post i realized something.
Jawapa isnt a regular Sheriff.
His rolecard says ,,Finding out if someone has the ability to kill.,, instead of ,,Finding out if someone is supicious.,,
So that means there MUST be another killing role that excludes the mafia.
So indeed we have a Serial Killer or some sort of killing evil role in this game.
Oh thays just peachy.

Different55 wrote:

Okay but he was actually a citizen? He died and we all saw his role. What in the world are you on?

You didnt know he was citizen so dont even try to pull that one off.

Different55 wrote:

No, he's contrbuted nothing to this game. He's done nothing. He's said nothing. But you are absolutely determined that we must have PROOF of his innocence despite that being impossible, and you totally ignore me asking why you were defending him. What reason do you have to believe kuba is innocent?

Thats pretty much lurking.
Also i dont believe kuba is innocent
I dont believe he is mafia either.
I believe you are lynching him for ,,lurking,, which for me doesnt seem like much.

Different55 wrote:

So? I already said that even if our sheriff wasn't a one shot wonder, we would have no guarantee. That was my whole point. There's no guarantee of finding anything. The only guarantee a sheriff can get is if someone comes back guilty, and he didn't get a guilty result back so we have no idea. There will never be proof of innocence in this game, so your insistence of having proof for kuba is ridiculous.

Oh well why dont we lynch you then? I mean, there is no gurantee that you arent mafia. Theres no gurantee maxi isnt mafia. Theres no gurantee God isnt the mafia.

Different55 wrote:

Like I said in my last post, simply not lynching anyone because of lack of information is a bad choice.

Different55 wrote:

so your insistence of having proof for kuba is ridiculous.

Says its a bad idea to lynch someone with lack of information.
Says we dont need information to lynch.
MAKE UP YOUR MIND.

Different55 wrote:

What the heck? Bimps was innocent both games

Lol. Who needs to research anyways.

Different55 wrote:

if there's a change in behavior from one game to another it's obviously not because he was mafia

Well last game Creature was mafia.
He had a change of behavior in that game
Contradictiosn everywhere.

Luka504 · 2016-06-07 10:27:55

Oh wait i made a mistake.

Says its a bad idea to lynch someone with lack of information.
Says we dont need information to lynch.
MAKE UP YOUR MIND.

This is wrong i didnt see the NOT before he lynch.
Ignore plz

Evilbunny · 2016-06-07 11:28:09

How much time do we have left?

I don't want to vote for kuba before he gets a chance to defend himself, but something tells me that probably isn't gonna happen.

Onjit · 2016-06-07 11:35:25

Evilbunny wrote:

How much time do we have left?

A little over 24 hours.

TaskManager · 2016-06-07 12:31:38

luka wtf
its not like kuba made just 4 completely useless posts
while kirby at the very least tried to contribute (despite being/playing dumb)

Zumza · 2016-06-07 12:45:32

maxi123 wrote:

well its odd how zumza tried so hard on pushing against smittyw, possibly zumza is executor?

I had no idea there are neutral roles then. Now because I know, Im more reserved on SmittyW.
Also if I would be an executor then why would I encourage Marco to shoot him? (btw. which is not longer necessary)

Now I believe I should wait and choose a second person I believe is mafia, until Im sure how dangerous SmittyW is.
!unvote

JaWapa wrote:

Zumza wrote:
If I were mafia why would I have wanted to kill SmittyW?
Uh... because that's your job as Mafia...? To get everyone killed?

Wouldn't it be simpler for me just go with the flock if I would be Mafia?
I didn't even voted for Bimps... *coach*

kubapolish · 2016-06-07 13:50:26

ok so
my role is villager citizen/town, yes i read all of posts here, and who i suspect...

well, i dont know even after reading again most of posts, but if i would have to do a choice, i would think of SmittyW.

http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 63#p605163

Zumza wrote:

SmittyW wrote:
I can guarantee that I'm a vigilante. No hidden abilities or other bs. Cross my <3. XOXOXOXO
I really didn't expect someone to counterclaim because I assumed there was only one killing PR but marco sounds pretty serious. Either way, if marco doesn't have some back-up plan, then I'd say he's a goner. Maybe someone can protect him...
Later wrote:
SmittyW wrote:
Ya know, if you were a big and thought I was fake claiming, you could have just shot me silently. That's kinda ur job
Now I'm somewhat glad you counterclaimed so I can ask you not to waste a bullet on me. Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise.
My theory: SmittyW decided to protect himself from any investigation and get all the heal from doctor, bodyguards so he could kill without any worries. He probably didn't even believe there was a vigilante in this game, or he actually plan somebody will counterclaim to kill him first and janitor wash his role.
"Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise."
I don't remember SmittyW confirmed his attack on Marco.
As for Marco he proved himself for being a vigilante.
What if mafia would play poorly in a game with so much reverse psychology? Nobody would believe they're mafia.
Please, can somebody else than Smitty give arguments for not being mafia?
!vote SmittyW

welp, i guess i just vote too
!vote SmittyW

and why i didnt posted much, well, i just didnt have an idea for post & my posts are useless btw ;.;

Zumza · 2016-06-07 13:52:06

Maxi on Bimps:

maxi123 wrote:

i think id rather go with lynching bimps because of his change in behavior
like it has been mentioned, smittyw and marco can sort their business out themselves

maxi123 wrote:

-_-
you guys were quick to hammer

Did Maxi wanted to lynch Bimps or not???

Maxi on Marco:

maxi123 wrote:

lol
marco is obviously being sarcastic
but you all decided to go full retard

maxi123 wrote:

i think i know now why smittyw roleclaimed/fakeclaimed (are you actually vig or not?)
but reasons to marco's role claim remain a mystery for me

maxi123 wrote:

marcoantonimsantos wrote:
And you still didn't understand that I counterclaimed SmittyW?
i always understood that.

He did or he didn't understood why Marco counterclaimed?

maxi123 wrote:

marcoantonimsantos wrote:
you know what? I'll shoot Pyromaniac.
why do you announce it to everyone, like RLLY

maxi123 wrote:

wait marco why did you shoot pyro
did i miss something

Did Maxi had a memory gasp?

Attention: I might have over-read this. Thats why I won't use this yet.

Zumza · 2016-06-07 13:56:11

Kubapolish wrote:

▼Zumza read on Smitty
Zumza wrote:
SmittyW wrote:
I can guarantee that I'm a vigilante. No hidden abilities or other bs. Cross my <3. XOXOXOXO
I really didn't expect someone to counterclaim because I assumed there was only one killing PR but marco sounds pretty serious. Either way, if marco doesn't have some back-up plan, then I'd say he's a goner. Maybe someone can protect him...
Later wrote:
SmittyW wrote:
Ya know, if you were a big and thought I was fake claiming, you could have just shot me silently. That's kinda ur job
Now I'm somewhat glad you counterclaimed so I can ask you not to waste a bullet on me. Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise.
My theory: SmittyW decided to protect himself from any investigation and get all the heal from doctor, bodyguards so he could kill without any worries. He probably didn't even believe there was a vigilante in this game, or he actually plan somebody will counterclaim to kill him first and janitor wash his role.
"Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise."
I don't remember SmittyW confirmed his attack on Marco.
As for Marco he proved himself for being a vigilante.
What if mafia would play poorly in a game with so much reverse psychology? Nobody would believe they're mafia.
Please, can somebody else than Smitty give arguments for not being mafia?
!vote SmittyW
welp, i guess i just vote too
!vote SmittyW
and why i didn't posted much, well, i just didn't have an idea for post & my posts are useless btw ;.;

I just unvote Smitty?... This overheads me.

Kingfdamt6579 · 2016-06-07 14:11:10

SmittyW wrote:

Will be back for more reads. Creature, Kirby, and Unau should definitely post more instead of randomly voting. Maybe AlphaJon should take Kingfdamt6579's place again.

You know what anyways? Ill give it back. Im not into forums and forum games so better give you guys an active player than me.

AlphaJon · 2016-06-07 14:38:19

Kingfdamt6579 wrote:

You know what anyways? Ill give it back. Im not into forums and forum games so better give you guys an active player than me.

Well, seems like Mafia doesn't work out well for him, so I'll just stick to the spot until death.

I'm busy now though, so I'll only post in a few hours (say about 3, maybe 4). And man there sure is a lot of reading in here. LOTS of walls of texts suddenly appearing out of nowhere.

Kirby · 2016-06-07 14:54:25

Different55 wrote:

Luka504 wrote:
Ok i barely understand whats going on here.
We are lynching Kuba beacuse he is lurking and is barely posting much.
Yet Kirby gets a free ride even though he has like 10 posts himself. Pretty much all of them are either joke comments or sheep votes beacuse
Kirby gets a free ride even though he has like 10 posts himself.
Kirby gets a free ride
I think you're right when you said you barely understand what's going on, because Kirby is in no way getting a free ride. I'd like him to do a few reads and tell us about a bit about his role though.
Yet again you dorks still have no proof of anything. Im not voting for Kuba until i believe he is mafia.
Did you not read Jawapa's posts? He's a cop. He investigated Zumza. He doesn't even know whether he got a result, or if he was roleblocked. I don't think proof is physically possible in this game. If you're waiting around for proof then please stop, because it's not coming. Read the topic, read the people, and make a decision on who you think is most suspicious. Then convince the rest of us and vote to lynch them.
You actually remind me a bit of me in my first mafia game. D1 I wanted a nolynch because we had 0 information to go on. But someone pointed out that relying on information of some kind to magically appear on D2 or even later wasn't a good strategy. You can't just not lynch anybody until someone slips up or until an investigator role shows up to save the day. If that worked then it wouldn't be a good game.
And I actually find this change of heart incredibly suspicious. D1 you said nothing about absolutely requiring hard proof to vote for bimps. He turned out to be town. But today we go after kuba for not participating AT ALL and suddenly you require proof? Yeah, that's not shady at all. Why the double standard? What makes kuba special?

I'm just a citizen names Bruce. No special abilities.

Kirby · 2016-06-07 14:54:58

^*named

Not being able to edit is annoying rip

TaskManager · 2016-06-07 15:51:06

Zumza wrote:

Did Maxi wanted to lynch Bimps or not???

after post #203 i was in doubt, that claim seemed somewhat truthful to me because thats not how bimps is lying in his posts
you guys however were quick to hammer and i didnt have the chance to say anything

Zumza wrote:

He did or he didn't understood why Marco counterclaimed?

i understood that marco DID a COUNTERCLAIM
but i didnt understand WHY he did that
read the quotes more carefully

Zumza wrote:

Did Maxi had a memory gasp?

OHHHHHHH
i actually forgot that marco announced he is going to kill pyro
this removes my doubts on him, thanks

Onjit · 2016-06-07 16:19:44

Votecount:

[4] Kubapolish: Different55, JaWapa, Kirby, Maxi123
[3] SmittyW: marcoantonimsantos, Zumza, Kubapolish
[1] Kirby: Creature

8 votes needed for majority.

Different55 · 2016-06-07 16:20:13

Dude your misinterpreted so many of the things I said I don't even know where to start. Like seriously, it wasn't just the "for lack of information" thing, it was practically everything.

Luka504 wrote:

Different55 wrote:
Woah woah woah, how do you know there's a serial killer? There were 2 kills last night, one from marco and one from the mafia. Unless the mafia got roleblocked, in which case yeah there's another killer. But either way, how would you know?
Who needs to read theories anyways.
Luka504 wrote:
Ok after reading this post i realized something.
Jawapa isnt a regular Sheriff.
His rolecard says ,,Finding out if someone has the ability to kill.,, instead of ,,Finding out if someone is supicious.,,
So that means there MUST be another killing role that excludes the mafia.
So indeed we have a Serial Killer or some sort of killing evil role in this game.
Oh thays just peachy.

Alright but that doesn't mean there's a serial killer. It could, but we also know that marco exists, he has a killing ability. Obviously he'd show up to Jawapa's investigative ability. It sounds more like a "hey here's a quirk in your ability you should look out for" than a "there's a serial killer, good luck finding him"

Different55 wrote:
Okay but he was actually a citizen? He died and we all saw his role. What in the world are you on?
You didnt know he was citizen so dont even try to pull that one off.

That's NOT the point. We are not justifying our lynching of bimps yesterday, the only reason bimps is brought up here at all is because you had no demand for proof yesterday, but suddenly it's a necessity today. That kind of double standard seems incredibly scummy. Tell me WHY you're so stubborn for proof today but not yesterday.

Different55 wrote:
No, he's contrbuted nothing to this game. He's done nothing. He's said nothing. But you are absolutely determined that we must have PROOF of his innocence despite that being impossible, and you totally ignore me asking why you were defending him. What reason do you have to believe kuba is innocent?
Thats pretty much lurking.
Also i dont believe kuba is innocent
I dont believe he is mafia either.
I believe you are lynching him for ,,lurking,, which for me doesnt seem like much.

Do you have a better idea? If so, feel free to speak up.

Different55 wrote:
So? I already said that even if our sheriff wasn't a one shot wonder, we would have no guarantee. That was my whole point. There's no guarantee of finding anything. The only guarantee a sheriff can get is if someone comes back guilty, and he didn't get a guilty result back so we have no idea. There will never be proof of innocence in this game, so your insistence of having proof for kuba is ridiculous.
Oh well why dont we lynch you then? I mean, there is no gurantee that you arent mafia. Theres no gurantee maxi isnt mafia. Theres no gurantee God isnt the mafia.

There's no guarantee, but that doesn't mean we lynch randomly. We lynch the people we suspect. What is wrong with that?

Different55 wrote:
What the heck? Bimps was innocent both games
Lol. Who needs to research anyways.

Game 8 and this game he was innocent. He behaved the same way both times, completely identically. But according to you he was definitely guilty, so guilty that you had proof that he was mafia. Except he wasn't. You were wrong. All of us were wrong. The difference between all of us and you is that we're not requiring hard proof. You didn't for bimps, but you do for kuba. Why?

Different55 wrote:
if there's a change in behavior from one game to another it's obviously not because he was mafia
Well last game Creature was mafia.
He had a change of behavior in that game
Contradictiosn everywhere.

That's taken so out of context I don't even. Whatever, bimps' actual innoccence is irrelevant here, we really need to quit bringing it up. The only relevant part of bimps' death is that you did not require proof of his guilt. Why? Why then and not now? What makes kuba different? You still haven't answered that question. You even snipped it out of my quote when you posted it.

mrjawapa · 2016-06-07 16:20:30

Am I the only one thinking Luka and Kuba are on the same team?

I say lynch Kuba despite his claim, and if he turns up guilty, hang luka.

mrjawapa · 2016-06-07 16:27:25

why are people voting for smitty?

And why does Zumza and Kuba always follow each others votes?

Different55 · 2016-06-07 16:34:47

Alright now that that giant mess of a lukapost is out of the way.

Kirby wrote:

I'm just a citizen named Bruce. No special abilities.

Kubapolish wrote:

my role is villager citizen/town, yes i read all of posts here, and who i suspect...

Awesome, ofc you're both citizens.

JaWapa wrote:

Am I the only one thinking Luka and Kuba are on the same team?
I say lynch Kuba despite his claim, and if he turns up guilty, hang luka.

You're not.

@the people lynching smitty
Can I ask why you guys suspect smitty? The quote you guys (well zumza, and then kuba quoted them) pulled from smitty's posts, "if someone can protect marco then nobody has to die, I promise," seem more like the last words of a meat shield than a sinister scum plot.

realmaster42 · 2016-06-07 17:57:45

Different55 wrote:

idk mang that just sounds exactly like what a citizen meatshield or jester would say. "If someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise." To me that comes across like someone's last words/wishes. I just can't see sinister intent behind it.

This is sad...
If I were mafia I would be laughing and happy right now.
If SmittyW is mafia I'm sure he is.

So just because he told to protect me then he is innocent???
WOOOOWWWW
thats why I win a lot of mafia games (outside eeforums)

If I am mafia, I do stuff like tell to protect vig, people think I am innocent, and never kill the vigilante on whole game, and then game over
-.-

Different55 wrote:

Can I ask why you guys suspect smitty? The quote you guys (well zumza, and then kuba quoted them) pulled from smitty's posts, "if someone can protect marco then nobody has to die, I promise," seem more like the last words of a meat shield than a sinister scum plot.

sadly you are defending SmittyW

Onjit wrote:

[4] Kubapolish: Different55, JaWapa, Kirby, Maxi123

Also this doesn't look right.
How quick everyone jumped on Kuba!

Different55, JaWapa, Kirby and Maxi123
welp

kubapolish

realmaster42 · 2016-06-07 17:59:17

JaWapa wrote:

And why does Zumza and Kuba always follow each others votes?

Zumza isn't exactly "following" Kuba's votes.
Kuba voted SmittyW wich Zumza voted, as I did. That doesn't mean I am following Zumza, or that Zumza is following me or Kuba.

Also interessting, why didn't you think I am following zumza's votes and zumza mines instead of kuba following zumza and zumza following Kuba?

Zumza, kubapolish

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#351 2016-06-07 07:44:25

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#352 2016-06-07 07:48:05

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#353 2016-06-07 08:10:09

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#354 2016-06-07 08:31:55

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#355 2016-06-07 10:25:51

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#356 2016-06-07 10:27:55

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#357 2016-06-07 11:28:09

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#358 2016-06-07 11:35:25

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#359 2016-06-07 12:31:38

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#360 2016-06-07 12:45:32

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#361 2016-06-07 13:50:26

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

"Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise."

#362 2016-06-07 13:52:06

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#363 2016-06-07 13:56:11

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

"Really if someone can protect marco none of us have to die, I promise."

#364 2016-06-07 14:11:10

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#365 2016-06-07 14:38:19

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#366 2016-06-07 14:54:25

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#367 2016-06-07 14:54:58

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#368 2016-06-07 15:51:06

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#369 2016-06-07 16:19:44

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#370 2016-06-07 16:20:13

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#371 2016-06-07 16:20:30

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#372 2016-06-07 16:27:25

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#373 2016-06-07 16:34:47

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#374 2016-06-07 17:57:45

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

#375 2016-06-07 17:59:17

Re: Mafia 9 Game Thread (MAFIA + MAXI WIN!!!)

Board footer