Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
you had no reason to vote AlphaJon
There it is again. I did give a reason. It wasn't based on any hard proof that he was maf, but it was a reason.
you attacked him
I don't recall attacking anyone...? What are you talking about?
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
Reading into somebody's attitude with knowledge on their personality and how they act in games is a valid reason to read somebody... It's not reliable, just like all other methods, but it is worth looking at.
This. I don't mean to overalign myself with Bobithan, but again I agree with him here. Stop judging peoples actions in the last game, and judge them on this one. Just because some people are playing differently does not mean they're mafia.
Avatar by RainDiance
I am obsessed with Steven Universe
Offline
Lupus pilum mutat, non mentem.
And for those who don't know latin: A wolf can change his coat but not his character.
So Jawapa how can you say that we shouldn't refer to everybody's personality?
And blindly saying that me, Creature and Alpha are mafia its like you want people consider that you are mafia. Well, I helped you.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Oh actually Bobithan ninjad me also. http://forums.everybodyedits.com/viewto … 64#p598864
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
blindly saying that me, Creature and Alpha are mafia
It wasn't blind.
its like you want people consider that you are mafia.
Sharing thoughts means you're now mafia? gg
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
@cali I was saying its not a bad idea to read based on personality, based on how ppl usually play. Tom acting like Tom is a lot different than Jan acting like Tom. It is worth looking into, it shouldn't be completely ignored.
aka towwl
Offline
It was because I helped you in reading Alpha and found reasons for accusation.
Subject(blindly saying that me, Creature and Alpha are mafia)
Im sure we increased exponentially the post count in a hour in latest minutes.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
On Max123:
there was a post somewhere saying that mafia wouldnt jump on an empty bandwagon like that since it would be too risky and i have to admit it makes sense
like A post where? The way I'm reading this is, "I saw a post somewhere in the mafia chat that said to not bandwagon town lynches because it looks too risky.>mafia outta nowhere jumps on 1 vote bandwagon = suicidal (not to mention that 1 vote was a joke vote)
This, to me, implies you know who the other mafia members are.
um
the said post was somewhere on pages 4-5 i dont remember
i could try finding it i guess
"implies you know who the other mafia members are"
what
just
what
i completely dont understand whats the linking here, between mafia bandwagoning being suicidal and me knowing who is mafia members, what led you to that conclusion?
Offline
JaWapa
You should take a look at how a scum plays, I recommend you read Mafia 3 and Mafia 5, where the scum had dominant presence. You're seeing AlphaJon, Zumza and me as mafia because of my reads, when I already stated why I am having a strong town read on Alpha and Zumza.
This is a false statement.
Offline
where the scum had dominant presence.
Okay, now I'm confused.
You're maf if you don't post. You're maf if you do post.
How many posts should I make per hour if I'm innocent? Is there a wiki I can read?
You're seeing AlphaJon, Zumza and me as mafia because of my reads, when I already stated why I am having a strong town read on Alpha and Zumza.
You're seeing me as mafia because of my vote, when I already told you why I voted that way.
gg
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
Calicara wrote:On Max123:
there was a post somewhere saying that mafia wouldnt jump on an empty bandwagon like that since it would be too risky and i have to admit it makes sense
like A post where? The way I'm reading this is, "I saw a post somewhere in the mafia chat that said to not bandwagon town lynches because it looks too risky.>mafia outta nowhere jumps on 1 vote bandwagon = suicidal (not to mention that 1 vote was a joke vote)
This, to me, implies you know who the other mafia members are.um
the said post was somewhere on pages 4-5 i dont remember
i could try finding it i guess"implies you know who the other mafia members are"
what
just
what
i completely dont understand whats the linking here, between mafia bandwagoning being suicidal and me knowing who is mafia members, what led you to that conclusion?
Your post was badly worded, but nevermind. I don't think it was a scumslip, I'm just reading too much into things.
Avatar by RainDiance
I am obsessed with Steven Universe
Offline
!vote marcoantonimsantos
Why are you so inactive? I expected you to be engaging Luka504 already.
Why only him? Bimps, Kaslai, Pyro, Smitty, Onjit, and Evilbunny have yet to contribute.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
Vote count:
JaWapa-Luka504, Calicara
Luka504-SmittyW, Bimps
marcoantonimsantos-Creature
Creature-JaWapa
8 votes needed for majority.
Offline
Creature wrote:where the scum had dominant presence.
Okay, now I'm confused.
You're maf if you don't post. You're maf if you do post.
How many posts should I make per hour if I'm innocent? Is there a wiki I can read?
I am not saying post too much/almost nothing is a scum tell.
Creature wrote:You're seeing AlphaJon, Zumza and me as mafia because of my reads, when I already stated why I am having a strong town read on Alpha and Zumza.
You're seeing me as mafia because of my vote, when I already told you why I voted that way.
gg
Still, your reason seemed forced, like you didn't know why you were voting alphajon and when someone questioned you, you said it's a reaction test.
Creature wrote:!vote marcoantonimsantos
Why are you so inactive? I expected you to be engaging Luka504 already.
Why only him? Bimps, Kaslai, Pyro, Smitty, Onjit, and Evilbunny have yet to contribute.
I prefer to start by him, as I know he's usually engaging.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Still, your reason seemed forced, like you didn't know why you were voting alphajon and when someone questioned you, you said it's a reaction test.
My reason seemed forced?
I voted, I was questioned, I gave my reason. There was no debate, no other talk about it.
Where are you getting it seemed forced?
I prefer to start by him, as I know he's usually engaging.
But it's wrong of me to put out a vote to get a reaction?
I'm seeing some double standards.
I am not saying post too much/almost nothing is a scum tell.
That is exactly what you have said.
Discord: jawp#5123
Offline
I want Pyromaniac to post
I would also like to have Evilbunny, Kaslai, Bimps and marcoantonimsantos post more (maybe Onjit too?)
Note: There are posts I don't quote but still agree with. You can tell by the woots. This helps shorten my posts and avoid the "quote followed by agree" repetition.
!vote Luka504
your only real defense is how you were mislynched in mafia 7. hint hint, roles are RNG, so that means nigh nothing
This is a rather weak argument for voting someone. You're also coming out of nowhere. I don't like this. Actually even less than JaWapa.
AlphaJon looks obvious because I know he's less talkative in his scum games, he's also focused on sorting the game, another thing he'd do as town, while his scum game would be more noise.
I just happened to have lots of free time today to spend on mafia, which i didn't in my previous games (Game 7 was OK, but I had Processor on my back, which cancelled it out lel)
!vote marcoantonimsantos
Why are you so inactive? I expected you to be engaging Luka504 already.
I already did the same, he said he'll post by tomorrow.
Offline
I always have trouble posting on day one, please forgive me Alpha.
I currently think Creature is the most suspicious because he seems to be throwing around FUD. I don't think he has said anything actionable though.
Offline
Creature wrote:Still, your reason seemed forced, like you didn't know why you were voting alphajon and when someone questioned you, you said it's a reaction test.
My reason seemed forced?
I voted, I was questioned, I gave my reason. There was no debate, no other talk about it.
Where are you getting it seemed forced?
It seemed like:
You: !vote AlphaJon
Someone: Why?
You: For voting himself, just wanted to see what he says.
Creature wrote:I prefer to start by him, as I know he's usually engaging.
But it's wrong of me to put out a vote to get a reaction?
I'm seeing some double standards.
Well, my intent was to make him say something, was your intent the same?
Creature wrote:I am not saying post too much/almost nothing is a scum tell.
That is exactly what you have said.
I mean't these were the games the mafia weren't just lurking and had more interaction. I wasn't saying posting too much is a scum tell.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Ok all I'm seeing this day is people being bad at this game. Nothing has really happened, only putting a microscope on things that aren't there.
Jawapa didn't do anything, Creature leave him alone. You are like the king of spammy random votes on people, you have no reason to pressure Jawapa for making a joke/pressure vote. Also saying "X player isn't playing how they usually play" is one of the most ridiculous things ever. Don't pretend like you know everything about every player. This game isn't that deep. People post what they want to post, when they want to post. Anybody could be putting up a fake act and you'd have no way to tell.
Also Creature you literally quoted jawapa saying "just wanted to see what he said" and then you went on to ask him what his intent was, in the same post.
Pls people work on your formatting with your responses people. There was a post by Luka and then somebody responding to him that were way too confusing to figure out what was being said. Then it happened again I think.
I don't have any reads on anybody because nobody has said anything that would make me think they are mafia. So you are all equally good to me. I don't blame anybody for being inactive right now, there isn't much to do.
Evilbunny (in cursive)
Offline
[ Started around 1732242918.312 - Generated in 0.087 seconds, 13 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.81 MiB (Peak: 2.1 MiB) ]