Do you think I could just leave this part blank and it'd be okay? We're just going to replace the whole thing with a header image anyway, right?
You are not logged in.
Luka504 wrote:Honestly Proc you are quite defensive when it comes to Zumza.
Is there any reason for you to be doing this?
Just sayin.
Also i noticed a few votes on maxi.
Well why the heck is he the only suspected defender!?
Both Pyro and EvilBunny stood up for me.
Im not saying either of the mentioned people are Mafia
But what is with your awful logic .-.
PS: Apparently im still ,,voting,, for n1kf
So i guess ill !nolynch FOR now.
Im still a bit suspicious on Procs and Zumzas relationship.wow
you only read the last post of the page
read mine pls
scroll upyou've got all your answers
and Pyro didn't 'stood up' for you (Atleast I didn't find any trace of him doing so)
and EvilBunny did 'stood up' for you, yeah, but why are you now accusing him? It seems like you are in a tick tock strategy where you get other mafia members to help you and then you say they are mafia and run away known as innocent. On my brain you aren't innocent.So let's do a deal.
!unvote
!vote Luka507
Heh wow.
Well read what i said.
Im not saying any of the named people are automatic scum
Also i have read your post, but im gonna say the same thing i said about maxi
Defending is no solid proof someone is scum
Also in technicality Pyro didnt stand up for me, but gave a reasonable explanation to why im not Mafia. So you can have that.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
Ok I suppose this makes more sense to me now. If I'm going to vote at all today, though, I'm going to wait till I have a good enough reason.
That's reasonable. I haven't voted yet also.
OH I ALMOST FORGOT
@Everyone: Please state what your role is in your will please. Since there are 6 mafia this time I don't know if there is some Disguiser bs or another mafia that can cover up roles upon death.
Offline
Anak wrote:Ok I suppose this makes more sense to me now. If I'm going to vote at all today, though, I'm going to wait till I have a good enough reason.
That's reasonable. I haven't voted yet also.
OH I ALMOST FORGOT
@Everyone: Please state what your role is in your will please. Since there are 6 mafia this time I don't know if there is some Disguiser bs or another mafia that can cover up roles upon death.
1. Im not sure wills are allowed this game
2. I doubt there are disguisers
3. Even if there were, it seems kind of pointless. The role of a DEAD person wont change much,it only says what the town has lost.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
3. Even if there were, it seems kind of pointless. The role of a DEAD person wont change much,it only says what the town has lost.
Which is very important
How are you editing your posts? I didn't think it was even possible
If my post is last and i attempt to double post there is a message saying i can just add the new content to my first post.
And i follow that link.
How long will it take me to get banned again?
Place your bets right here.
Offline
I'm gonna write my responses in orange
Ok
Now this little guy suprised me...
▼EvilBunny
I don't think marco's opinion on me should carry any weight with anybody, I don't even understand why he thinks I'm mafia.
Evilbunny (in cursive)
Offline
I think you are over reacting and see things that don't exist.
You act like there have been millions of questions addressed to me and I ignore them completely. The truth is that there was only two questions made by Anak with obvious answers. I told Anak to read them again and then I got to sleep(as Bobithan confirmed too). So this explains my moments of silence.
I never said my English is perfect. I did excused often for it. Until someone told me that when I do that he feels wrong because he doesn't know my language. One of the reasons I frequent this forums is to improve it.
I didn't feel I should accuse Anak for anything. Everyone has their right to have any opinion. And I'm not going to force them take mine. Anak didn't vote me for lynch and I think thats says a lot.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
If my post is last and i attempt to double post there is a message saying i can just add the new content to my first post.
And i follow that link.
.diff
<RatBotTro> diff this is all your fault
aka towwl
Offline
3. You may not edit or delete your posts. This function will be disabled in this game.
Nobody should be editing their post, even if it is possible.
Also Creature, don't you think it's a little ridiculous that when you went through all of maxi's posts, you thought they were all scummy except one? Maybe try not trying so hard.
Evilbunny (in cursive)
Offline
I think you are over reacting and see things that don't exist.
You act like there have been millions of questions addressed to me and I ignore them completely. The truth is that there was only two questions made by Anak with obvious answers. I told Anak to read them again and then I got to sleep(as Bobithan confirmed too). So this explains my moments of silence.
I didn't feel I should accuse Anak for anything. Everyone has their right to have any opinion. And I'm not going to force them take mine. Anak didn't vote me for lynch and I think thats says a lot.
Uh, no I don't? I've only asked a few questions, which you dodged, and that is suspicious enough. The answers weren't obvious, and even if they were, it doesn't change anything, bc you refused to answer. I don't think I'm overreacting at all. Others also find your behaviour suspicious.
What does my not voting say? (Not an obvious answer, since I'm asking, bc I don't know what it says.)
Uh, no I don't? I've only asked a few questions, which you dodged, and that is suspicious enough. The answers weren't obvious, and even if they were, it doesn't change anything, bc you refused to answer. I don't think I'm overreacting at all. Others also find your behaviour suspicious.
What does my not voting say? (Not an obvious answer, since I'm asking, bc I don't know what it says.)
There were only two question maybe only one if you would rephrase them. Please make a list and post them, so we can both count them and to respond them.
That statements above weren't addressed just for you. A lot of people are over reacting.
While you are not voting me that means you are not sure of what you are saying.
I won't vote for you just for misunderstanding me.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Zumza wrote:Bobithan wrote:But people have pointed it out already and yeah Zumza seems pretty scummy with that blatant dodging on Anak's question twice by first ignoring it and then by posting some cryptic response hardly related to the question at all. Otherwise he seems to be trying to be "helpful" in mediocre ways such as...
Zumza wrote:The most subtle things are the most honest ones. So I watch for anything.
and his conversation with processor, which included what Anak first started questioning Zumza on, and a windy face that really rubs me the wrong way
Keep in mind that the reciprocal of that quote is also true. (How does make you feel?)
And no I'm not going to answer the question that you can answer yourself. (Can't I post smiley faces? Its the first time I do this so tell me...)
The most innocent people are the ones who die first.I'm towny! Idk who said that everyone should say their townies. So lets do this exercise everybody: say that you are towny in your next post.
What do you have to lose?So not only did you dodge my question, but you refused to answer it? Why? It doesn't matter if we can "answer it ourselves". If you're blatantly avoiding questions asked to you, it makes you look pretty suspicious.
(Also, did you edit that post somehow? I'm pretty sure the sheep image and thereafter wasn't there when I first saw it)
I don't recall you responding to this post
I won't vote for you just for misunderstanding me.
Also what relevance is that lmao.
Please make a list and post them, so we can both count them and to respond them.
Also I'm not your lackey. You should be reading back to see what you missed or was addressed to you. I shouldn't be fetching posts for you.
I'm gonna write my responses in orange
marcoantonimsantos wrote:Ok
Now this little guy suprised me...
▼EvilBunnyI don't think marco's opinion on me should carry any weight with anybody, I don't even understand why he thinks I'm mafia.
Thanks for giving me your answers to all those questions
I've got the INFO I wanted already.
marcoantonimsantos wrote:Luka504 wrote:Honestly Proc you are quite defensive when it comes to Zumza.
Is there any reason for you to be doing this?
Just sayin.
Also i noticed a few votes on maxi.
Well why the heck is he the only suspected defender!?
Both Pyro and EvilBunny stood up for me.
Im not saying either of the mentioned people are Mafia
But what is with your awful logic .-.
PS: Apparently im still ,,voting,, for n1kf
So i guess ill !nolynch FOR now.
Im still a bit suspicious on Procs and Zumzas relationship.wow
you only read the last post of the page
read mine pls
scroll upyou've got all your answers
and Pyro didn't 'stood up' for you (Atleast I didn't find any trace of him doing so)
and EvilBunny did 'stood up' for you, yeah, but why are you now accusing him? It seems like you are in a tick tock strategy where you get other mafia members to help you and then you say they are mafia and run away known as innocent. On my brain you aren't innocent.So let's do a deal.
!unvote
!vote Luka507Heh wow.
Well read what i said.Im not saying any of the named people are automatic scum
Also i have read your post, but im gonna say the same thing i said about maxi
Defending is no solid proof someone is scum
Also in technicality Pyro didnt stand up for me, but gave a reasonable explanation to why im not Mafia. So you can have that.
I mentioned other reassons than defending, that gives my defending theory the proof I needed...
dude
why do you only read portions of the text?
read it from start to finish, please.
Offline
Creature wrote:Also, for the nolynch voters:
Did you know that if the deadline ends and no majority has been reached on someone, the day will end in a nolynch? Voting nolynch is not just useless, but prejudicial to town.
What do you mean prejudicial
By nolynching earlier, you're taking our time of discussion by ending the day earlier. Discussion is town's best weapon, this is why who outright votes nolynch is automatically suspicious.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Also, defending someone doesn't automatically make you and him both scum buddies. However, if the defense looks unexplained, it can be a bit suspicious.
This is a false statement.
Offline
Zumza wrote:Please make a list and post them, so we can both count them and to respond them.
Also I'm not your lackey. You should be reading back to see what you missed or was addressed to you. I shouldn't be fetching posts for you.
Thats exactly what I want to say by try answer yourself.
Everybody edits, but some edit more than others
Offline
Anak wrote:I don't recall you responding to this post
So if you don't recall it I guess you were able to answer yourself after all?
Literally what?
Also did I miss something or is Rhaz really behind on counting up the updated votes?
Offline
Anak wrote:Zumza wrote:Please make a list and post them, so we can both count them and to respond them.
Also I'm not your lackey. You should be reading back to see what you missed or was addressed to you. I shouldn't be fetching posts for you.
Thats exactly what I want to say by try answer yourself.
Zumza- telling him to answer his own questions is what's making you look so damn suspicious. Just give a straightforward answer and ditch this whole cutesy ambiguous persona
Offline
[ Started around 1732291114.6627 - Generated in 0.331 seconds, 12 queries executed - Memory usage: 1.88 MiB (Peak: 2.19 MiB) ]