Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Creature · 2016-03-05 14:00:41

Votecount 3.1

[1] Kaslai - RhazzleFrazzle
[0] Onjit
[0] Anak
[0] maxi123
[0] Calicara
[0] Pyromaniac
[0] AlphaJon
[0] RhazzleFrazzle

[0] No lynch
[7] Not voting: Onjit, Anak, maxi123, Calicara, Pyromaniac, AlphaJon, Kaslai.

With 8 alive, it takes 5 votes to reach majority.

AlphaJon · 2016-03-05 14:10:54

Dunno, why Kaslai in particular? I mean, we are 8, you must have a particular reason on why you decided to go on him.
Guess I'll have to take some time to reread the whole topic to get a better understanding of it.

Onjit · 2016-03-05 14:15:08

Do you have any particular reasons? Not necessarily hard evidence, but I don't want to follow your hunch blindly.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 14:51:14

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

We don't have a Janitor so I'll just keep it in my will. Rather not tell the Mafia who to kill since that person is confirmed non Mafia. Anyways I want to know what Anak meant by what I quoted. It implies me as the Veteran.

Why would this matter? Don't the mafia already KNOW who isn't mafia?

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 14:54:00

Also why dont any of you ever explain your "suspicions".

Pressure votes are dumb and just confuse everyone.

(RHAZ)

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-03-05 15:00:09

Pyromaniac wrote:

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:
We don't have a Janitor so I'll just keep it in my will. Rather not tell the Mafia who to kill since that person is confirmed non Mafia. Anyways I want to know what Anak meant by what I quoted. It implies me as the Veteran.
Why would this matter? Don't the mafia already KNOW who isn't mafia?

Having more people confirmed non Mafia means you can narrow down the suspects. Mafia want those people dead, and if I said who those people were it would make them a bigger target. Now quit being stupid and looking like scum. Seriously I'm having trouble telling if you're scum or just being your usual self.

Calicara · 2016-03-05 15:00:26

Everyone seems to be playing pretty neutral. I'm not sure why you're targeting Kaslai in particular. Either way lets be logical about this and not form a lynch mob. The last thing we need is to lynch another town like D2.

Calicara · 2016-03-05 15:36:24

Here are my reads so far:

Rhazz

He claims Sheriff and acts like it too, playing very aggressive and making 'pressure' votes. I don't think he's lying about his role, but my problem is I think he's so paranoid about losing he practically votes up anyone he hasn't investigated yet. And we saw how well they worked on D2 when Unau was mob lynched. I don't think Rhazz is scum, but I also think he needs to calm down. Again, evidence before conviction. In the end you might have had evidence against Ninja, but for now you have none against Kaslai, so why would you vote him? I question your methods.

Anak

Anak is possible scum it's hard to say. He doesn't post much, but when he does it's either because he's jumping on the lynch train, or seemingly confused. I don't read him as particularly scummy, but I wouldn't put it past him, as we've sen in past games he's quite the effective lurker.

Onjit

Onjit same as Anak. I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt, but he seems to do quite a bit of lurking. Again, it's nothing I can prove, but I'd still be wary.

Maxi123

Like last game Maxi123 is being overly defensive, but I'm convinced that's just his play style. I haven't seen a whole lot to convince me he's scum, so I'm pretty sure he's town.

Pyromaniac

Hard to give a read from someone who doesn't post much, but when he does post I'm pretty aligned with his reads, so he's probably town.

AlphaJon/Kaslai

These two seem the hardest to read too me, as neither of them seem to have contributed a lot of useful information, but I don't think that necessarily makes them scum, maybe they just don't have read and/or have nothing to add. I'd rather see fewer useful posts then a bunch of spam posts (maybe that's just me).

AlphaJon · 2016-03-05 16:27:20

Good to know my posts are considered spam
Back on topic: I don't think I'll have the time to reread the topic today, so I don't really have any read for anyone except Rhaz, and I'm already saying out openly what I think of him in my previous posts. (I admit this post isn't really useful, I just want you to know I won't be very active today)

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 16:48:52

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

Pyromaniac wrote:
RhazzleFrazzle wrote:
We don't have a Janitor so I'll just keep it in my will. Rather not tell the Mafia who to kill since that person is confirmed non Mafia. Anyways I want to know what Anak meant by what I quoted. It implies me as the Veteran.
Why would this matter? Don't the mafia already KNOW who isn't mafia?
Having more people confirmed non Mafia means you can narrow down the suspects. Mafia want those people dead, and if I said who those people were it would make them a bigger target. Now quit being stupid and looking like scum. Seriously I'm having trouble telling if you're scum or just being your usual self.

Excuse me? I don't know where that came from.

I was just asking a question. You're being a **** for no reason.

Now stop being such a damn neckbearded try hard and just chill.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 16:50:11

Playing this aggressively has never worked for you, so I don't know why you keep trying it.

And how have I looked like scum? I have posted like three times in this thread

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 16:53:33

Also notice there's still no explanation for his dumb **** vote on kaslai

Anak · 2016-03-05 16:59:40

Pyromaniac wrote:

Also notice there's still no explanation for his dumb **** vote on kaslai

I would like to know why he felt the need to do that little experiment as well.

Calicara wrote:

Anak
Anak is possible scum it's hard to say. He doesn't post much, but when he does it's either because he's jumping on the lynch train, or seemingly confused. I don't read him as particularly scummy, but I wouldn't put it past him, as we've sen in past games he's quite the effective lurker.

Yeah not much I can say about that. I've been considerably busier than before due to school and also applying for colleges.

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-03-05 16:59:40

Yeah scratch that. Pyro is being his usual obvious Town self.

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-03-05 17:02:36

If I were to bet on who the last 3 scum are I'd say it's Anak Calicara and Kaslai.

Anak · 2016-03-05 17:04:10

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

If I were to bet on who the last 3 scum are I'd say it's Anak Calicara and Kaslai.

Same reasoning as Calicara or different?

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-03-05 17:06:14

Anak wrote:

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:
If I were to bet on who the last 3 scum are I'd say it's Anak Calicara and Kaslai.
Same reasoning as Calicara or different?

If I told you why I was scumreading you I'd be telling you how not to be scumread ;)

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 17:06:54

Dear god you have got to be one of the most abrasive people I have ever come across

Anak · 2016-03-05 17:09:32

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

Anak wrote:
RhazzleFrazzle wrote:
If I were to bet on who the last 3 scum are I'd say it's Anak Calicara and Kaslai.
Same reasoning as Calicara or different?
If I told you why I was scumreading you I'd be telling you how not to be scumread

Well your reads on me just looks unfounded. Hadn't you have claimed and be more or less confirmed, you'd be high on my suspicion list.
If it's the same as what Calicara said, I've just explained that and in that situation there's not much I can do. You haven't responded with that before so I don't know why you choose to now.

Pyromaniac

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 17:11:14

Also rhaz you've said yourself (and proven it time and time again) how bad you are at scum reading.

Why should we listen to you now, especially with no explanation?

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-03-05 17:12:38

Pyromaniac wrote:

Also rhaz you've said yourself (and proven it time and time again) how bad you are at scum reading.
Why should we listen to you now, especially with no explanation?

...Because I have information that you don't?

Anak · 2016-03-05 17:16:43

RhazzleFrazzle wrote:

Pyromaniac wrote:
Also rhaz you've said yourself (and proven it time and time again) how bad you are at scum reading.
Why should we listen to you now, especially with no explanation?
...Because I have information that you don't?

That doesn't mean you shouldn't explain yourself. Your posts implied you didn't have solid evidence anyways.

Pyromaniac

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 17:17:53

Hmmmm ok I'll just trust that you know best even though you've never shown yourself to be anything other than simply aggressive.

No explanation needed!!! I'll blindly follow you.

RhazzleFrazzle · 2016-03-05 17:22:55

I got those 3 working backwards from the living player list-myself-people I know aren't Mafia-people I'm Townreading. Out of everyone alive, those 3 are the most likely to be scum. Also btw Pyromaniac is so painfully obviously Town it's not even funny. I don't even need to investigate him it's so obvious.

Pyromaniac · 2016-03-05 17:29:06

Lol that's not "information" I don't have. That's barely speculation.

And wow good for you, did you get that from me calling you a neckbearded try hard or a ****?

Official Everybody Edits Forums

#351 2016-03-05 14:00:41

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#352 2016-03-05 14:10:54

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#353 2016-03-05 14:15:08

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#354 2016-03-05 14:51:14

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#355 2016-03-05 14:54:00

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#356 2016-03-05 15:00:09

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#357 2016-03-05 15:00:26

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#358 2016-03-05 15:36:24

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#359 2016-03-05 16:27:20

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#360 2016-03-05 16:48:52

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#361 2016-03-05 16:50:11

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#362 2016-03-05 16:53:33

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#363 2016-03-05 16:59:40

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#364 2016-03-05 16:59:40

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#365 2016-03-05 17:02:36

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#366 2016-03-05 17:04:10

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#367 2016-03-05 17:06:14

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#368 2016-03-05 17:06:54

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#369 2016-03-05 17:09:32

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#370 2016-03-05 17:11:14

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#371 2016-03-05 17:12:38

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#372 2016-03-05 17:16:43

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#373 2016-03-05 17:17:53

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#374 2016-03-05 17:22:55

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

#375 2016-03-05 17:29:06

Re: Mafia | Game 5 - Mafia/Witch Victory: The New Law

Board footer